Looking for an mp3 player
Moderator: Thanas
Looking for an mp3 player
Hey, Im looking for an mp3 player. Its a christmas gift for my fiancee.
- Must be reliable and well built. We had bad experiences in the past with some mp3 players (cheapest ones really), which worked for about a month and then broke.
- Capacity is not that important. Anything above 256mb will do.
- Must have a pendrive feature (but I imagine all do)
- Radio receiver is a very welcome feature.
- Must be reliable and well built. We had bad experiences in the past with some mp3 players (cheapest ones really), which worked for about a month and then broke.
- Capacity is not that important. Anything above 256mb will do.
- Must have a pendrive feature (but I imagine all do)
- Radio receiver is a very welcome feature.
Creative. I don't know what the current must-have line is but check their website and you'll find what you need.
ETA: the ZEN, perhaps, or maybe a ZEN Nano Plus
ETA: the ZEN, perhaps, or maybe a ZEN Nano Plus
Yeah, because it's not designed for people who use music while jogging/working out etc and can't see the screen anyway! When I had an old SD card MP3 player, it had a display... and it was WORTHLESS, since I only ever used random anyway. I wouldn't miss it, particularly if it gives better batterylife, smaller footprint, and made it cheaper.Bounty wrote:I would not spend a cent on a music player that doesn't even have a screen.
Shuffle battery life: 12 hoursStark wrote:Yeah, because it's not designed for people who use music while jogging/working out etc and can't see the screen anyway! When I had an old SD card MP3 player, it had a display... and it was WORTHLESS, since I only ever used random anyway. I wouldn't miss it, particularly if it gives better batterylife, smaller footprint, and made it cheaper.Bounty wrote:I would not spend a cent on a music player that doesn't even have a screen.
Nano Plus battery life: 18 hours
Shuffle price, 1 gig: $79.99
Nano Plus price, 1 gig: $69.95
You were saying?
Yeah, because I own a shuffle, and I'm trying to change your mind, right?
I'm simply saying that 'loller no screen' is retarded, since the crappy screens many mp3 players have are useless anyway. Unless they're full-navigation stuff like the larger players, it's hardly a huge sacrifice, certainly not instant death as you claim.
Course, the Nano Plus *does* need a screen for it's FM tuning. Even if it appears it's incredibly small.
I'm simply saying that 'loller no screen' is retarded, since the crappy screens many mp3 players have are useless anyway. Unless they're full-navigation stuff like the larger players, it's hardly a huge sacrifice, certainly not instant death as you claim.
Course, the Nano Plus *does* need a screen for it's FM tuning. Even if it appears it's incredibly small.
To be honest, you're the first person I've ever heard saying you don't need a screen. I used to have a Creative Muvo with a tiny screen and I can't imagine how I could have managed without it. Equalizer settings and FM tuning has to be a complete bitch when you try to do it blind.I'm simply saying that 'loller no screen' is retarded, since the crappy screens many mp3 players have are useless anyway. Unless they're full-navigation stuff like the larger players, it's hardly a huge sacrifice, certainly not instant death as you claim.
I bought a Creative MuVoTX Nomad 512 about a year and a half ago, and its still in ok working order now (the battery plate has lost its staying-in-ability so sellotape is needed, and the headphones have just died, but otherwise its fine). I paid £60 for it then, I'm sure its cheaper now, but to be honest I'd recommend paying a bit more and getting a larger one.
- Master of Ossus
- Darkest Knight
- Posts: 18213
- Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
- Location: California
Even if it's not a feature that you find useful, I find his analysis compelling. It's clearly not wasting batteries too much, and it's not costly, so if it's even a non-issue (as opposed to an inconvenience) then it's the better deal.Stark wrote:I'm simply saying that 'loller no screen' is retarded, since the crappy screens many mp3 players have are useless anyway. Unless they're full-navigation stuff like the larger players, it's hardly a huge sacrifice, certainly not instant death as you claim.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Let it never be said I think the Shuffle is worth buying. However, small mp3 players just don't need one, as the overhead for a 'proper' screen is too high and all the screen says is 'this is the song you can hear' and 'this is how loud it is, that thing you're hearing'. Like I said, the Creative has a tuner, so it actually needs one, and the Shuffle is inferior in all respects except size. However, EQ settings on small mp3 players doesn't sound like something you're going to be changing all the time: does anyone actually change their EQ preset on a song-by-song basis without just using ID3 tags to do it for you?Master of Ossus wrote:Even if it's not a feature that you find useful, I find his analysis compelling. It's clearly not wasting batteries too much, and it's not costly, so if it's even a non-issue (as opposed to an inconvenience) then it's the better deal.