LinearA

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-12-17 11:24am

LinearA stands before the Imperial Senate accused of the following transgressions in this thread:

Violation of Posting Rule 9 (thread necromancy)
Violations of Debating Rule 5 (broken-record tactics)
Violations of Posting Rule 3 (serial dishonesty)

Esteemed and honored colleagues, what shall we do about this?

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2006-12-17 11:54am

Lose him.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-12-17 03:29pm

necromancer who knows he's breaking the rules, not adding anything substative and a wall of ignorance. fuck it, too much of a hassle to redeem. (shit I'm usually the voice of dissent)

Post by **Edi** » 2006-12-17 04:48pm

Ban him.

Edi

Post by **Simplicius** » 2006-12-17 10:17pm

Throw the bum out.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-12-17 10:26pm

Throw him out. Basically it's becoming a long winded circular hell for nothing then more then someone wanting writer's intent taken into consideration.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-12-17 10:39pm

Permban.

Sonnenburg · Post by **Sonnenburg** » 2006-12-17 11:42pm

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2006-12-18 12:46am

There's necromancy and then there's necromany just to hit us with a broken record which is worse, off with his head.

Post by **Coyote** » 2006-12-18 03:18pm

Bye, Bye, Linear. Energize.

phongn · Post by **phongn** » 2006-12-18 03:22pm

Stick a fork in him, he's done.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2006-12-18 05:32pm

It's a shame because he's obviously intelligent and well spoken, but broken record tactics get you shown the door here, as they well should. Ban.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2006-12-18 06:20pm

Toss him out for all the aforementioned reason.

I wonder if we'll get a third banning in and have a Holiday Bannathon?

Lord Poe · Post by **Lord Poe** » 2006-12-19 12:29am

Permban.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-12-19 01:19pm

To be honest, I think that little ratfuck knows perfectly well that he got his ass kicked in that debate, which is why he came back after a month just to raise the dead thread and repeat himself like a broken record despite knowing full well that according to our posted rules, we ban people who do that. The idea is to get banned so he can save face and pretend that he was winning but we banned him because we can't handle dissent.

Of course, it's also possible that he's so fucking stupid that he genuinely doesn't understand the points being raised against his position or the clearly stated rule that he can't argue by simply repeating himself ad nauseum. But I suspect he's just trying to spin-doctor his abortion of an argument. Of course, that plan would require that we can't see through his little plan and point out what he's doing. So either way, he's an idiot.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-12-23 11:40am

Given his latest remark, and given Mike's response...so any early gifts, Mike?

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2006-12-27 12:59am

Small note as with my reminder in the other thread we still need a few more votes to make quorum so vote if you haven't.

Post by **Dalton** » 2006-12-27 08:06pm

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-12-27 08:12pm

come on two more votes....

Post by **Zaia** » 2006-12-27 08:36pm

Voted for a temp ban, since I thought the whole purpose of a temp ban was for guys just like this who break debating rules but haven't received any administrative action before. Given the poll results, it was fairly pointless of me to vote that way, but that's what I think, so that's how I voted.

seanrobertson · Post by **seanrobertson** » 2006-12-29 11:45am

The Yosemite Bear wrote:come on two more votes....

Here's one.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2007-01-02 08:31am

Full quorum, voted to ban the retard...so any admin want the happy job?

Capsaicin · Post by **Capsaicin** » 2007-01-02 05:21pm

*wipes hands*

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2007-01-02 06:53pm

And away to Parting Shots we go.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

LinearA

What should we do?

LinearA