Windows Server 2003 box needs to act as a webserver, among other things.
I've already been a good little masochist and fucked around with Apache on Windows before so I know what that's like, so can I use IIS 6 with reasonable confidence or am I going to be butt-reamed by exploits?
IIS or Apache
Moderator: Thanas
-
Uraniun235
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13772
- Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
- Location: OREGON
- Contact:
IIS or Apache
"There is no "taboo" on using nuclear weapons." -Julhelm
What is Project Zohar?
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
I second IIS6 on Windows 2003 . Microsoft has done a lot to patch security in Server 2003 (I still prefer Apache/Linux, but for other reasons). W/o the use of vim, configuring things by text files is annoying 
ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer
George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
