Another Idiot Trekkie.

His Divine Shadow · Post by **His Divine Shadow** » 2003-01-03 06:49pm

Well photons are called photons because of a bad translation, see Enterprise(that was actually clever), they release a burst of radiation, so the gist is true, but what he seems to fail to understand is that this disproves the laser-immunity syndrome.

And physical projectiles in space are wastefull and inefficient and depends on ammunition, they're only good if they can reach longer, home and/or pack a better punch.

Ingersoll · Post by **Ingersoll** » 2003-01-03 06:53pm

he's a Star Wars fan more than anything. Look at his main page.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-01-03 06:55pm

Ingersoll wrote:he's a Star Wars fan more than anything. Look at his main page.

But he's still an idiot.

Darth Garden Gnome · Post by **Darth Garden Gnome** » 2003-01-03 07:11pm

I thougth his reply was humorus. GL called them lasers so they must be the same type of lasers in Trek, regardless of dozens of EU sources, not to mention that even if they were Trek lasers they'd still many orders of magnitude more powerful, and also they do not behave as real lasers should.

I can make a movie where I call my foot a poodle, but guess what? It ain't no damn poodle.

Jadeite · Post by **Jadeite** » 2003-01-03 07:55pm

The result of this is that the Enterprise would be able to critically wound or destroy a Star Destroyer with one shot, while the Star Destroyer would be unable even to scratch the Enterprise's shields. It doesn't matter that the Enterprise has one weapon, is smaller, and is a "vessel of exploration". If the Star Destroyer was twice as big and had twice as many weapons, the result would be the same. So, of course, the Enterprise would be able to destroy any Star Wars ship. Corellian Corvettes, Imperial Star Destroyers, Super Star Destroyers, even the Eclipse would be helpless against it. It could be posited that even the Death Star would be useless against the Enterprise. Certainly its surface weapons would be of no use, as they are standard turbolaser batteries, but what about the superlaser? It would seem that it is just a bigger and badder laser, and would fall under the same category as other lasers, but that may not be so. If it is, then the Enterprise's shields should hold against it, but if not then we can proceed no further, since we are forced to guess as to its nature.

HE MUST BURN!

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-01-03 08:00pm

Jadeite wrote:
The result of this is that the Enterprise would be able to critically wound or destroy a Star Destroyer with one shot, while the Star Destroyer would be unable even to scratch the Enterprise's shields. It doesn't matter that the Enterprise has one weapon, is smaller, and is a "vessel of exploration". If the Star Destroyer was twice as big and had twice as many weapons, the result would be the same. So, of course, the Enterprise would be able to destroy any Star Wars ship. Corellian Corvettes, Imperial Star Destroyers, Super Star Destroyers, even the Eclipse would be helpless against it. It could be posited that even the Death Star would be useless against the Enterprise. Certainly its surface weapons would be of no use, as they are standard turbolaser batteries, but what about the superlaser? It would seem that it is just a bigger and badder laser, and would fall under the same category as other lasers, but that may not be so. If it is, then the Enterprise's shields should hold against it, but if not then we can proceed no further, since we are forced to guess as to its nature.
HE MUST BURN!

GK clone alert.

Keevan_Colton · Post by **Keevan_Colton** » 2003-01-03 08:17pm

Darth Servo wrote:
Jadeite wrote:
The result of this is that the Enterprise would be able to critically wound or destroy a Star Destroyer with one shot, while the Star Destroyer would be unable even to scratch the Enterprise's shields. It doesn't matter that the Enterprise has one weapon, is smaller, and is a "vessel of exploration". If the Star Destroyer was twice as big and had twice as many weapons, the result would be the same. So, of course, the Enterprise would be able to destroy any Star Wars ship. Corellian Corvettes, Imperial Star Destroyers, Super Star Destroyers, even the Eclipse would be helpless against it. It could be posited that even the Death Star would be useless against the Enterprise. Certainly its surface weapons would be of no use, as they are standard turbolaser batteries, but what about the superlaser? It would seem that it is just a bigger and badder laser, and would fall under the same category as other lasers, but that may not be so. If it is, then the Enterprise's shields should hold against it, but if not then we can proceed no further, since we are forced to guess as to its nature.
HE MUST BURN!
GK clone alert.

I think I understand now why they started to have problems with the notion of clones.....

Keevan.

Anarchist Bunny · Post by **Anarchist Bunny** » 2003-01-04 12:00am

DarkStar posing as an alter-ego to try very easily destroyed arguement to spread the ignorance without soiling his "reputation"

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-01-04 11:16pm

This is proof that we've been cloning people for years. Where do you think these Graham Kennedy clones come from? Anyway, I suggest that we show him here. If that doesn't work, we'll challenge him to a debate.

I'm suprised that there are people that still think ST could beat SW in this day and age. But hey, there are still people that think the Earth is flat.

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2003-01-04 11:34pm

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:This is proof that we've been cloning people for years. Where do you think these Graham Kennedy clones come from? Anyway, I suggest that we show him here. If that doesn't work, we'll challenge him to a debate.

I'm suprised that there are people that still think ST could beat SW in this day and age. But hey, there are still people that think the Earth is flat.

It's also proof that we still have a long way to go before what comes out is actually a human.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2003-01-04 11:38pm

I don't think he's cloning...perhaps he reproduces asexually?

Would explain a great deal.

Captain Kruger · Post by **Captain Kruger** » 2003-01-05 09:27am

If this is a cloning experiment, it proves that the clone's intelligence is inferior. This waste of flesh even makes GK look remotely intelligent.

The Nomad · Post by **The Nomad** » 2003-01-05 10:22am

This moron states that the E-D is 860 m long, when nearly all sources state it's 625 m long. He doesn't even know trek stats. Let him burn !!!!![/code]

EmperorMing · Post by **EmperorMing** » 2003-01-06 01:47am

I just tool a look at the page in question. The guy is long winded, like Dorkstar, with nothing to back it up. And shitty logic to boot...

And since he is complaining about all the email that he receives on the subject, he should put up a FAQ page similar to what has been done here.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2003-01-06 02:04am

It's bad enough when they come to Us, fail to read the website, but when we go knocking on doors.....

BTW WHERE do you find these People?