The Bulk Cruiser--is there actually a use for it?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
LeftWingExtremist
Padawan Learner
Posts: 330
Joined: 2005-03-16 05:20pm
Location: : The most livable city (melb)

Post by LeftWingExtremist »

Connor MacLeod wrote:I always figured frrom ANH that a Bulk cruiser was a cheap, mass produced, and second rate starship (military or otherwise) that was considered inferior compared to top of the line vessels (the "big Corellian ships", or Star Destroyers) It would make sense you'd see them in local defense fleets or backwater navies.

I also suspect that "bulk cruiser" is a catch-all term for different kinds of vessels along those lines.

IIRC the Daley novels have something called a "pocket cruiser" which is kinda along those same functions (and spirit, I believe.)
The problem is that bulk cruisers are physically larger than ships more powerful than it. So in material costs its more expensive as well as being less powerful than most ships smaller than it.
Image

"...And everything under the sun is in tune
but the sun is eclipsed by the moon." - eclipse, Pink Floyd.
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

The Bulk Cruiser is part transport ship. A lot of its volume would be empty space, and it doesn't mount as many weapons, power generators, etc. as a dedicated warship. That should keep the costs down.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Warsie
BANNED
Posts: 521
Joined: 2007-03-06 02:08pm
Location: Chicago, IL USA

Post by Warsie »

Isolder74 wrote:
You mean MC-80's?
no, the smaller MC40s.
MC-40's were I think light cruiser that were good at their job of being light cruisers. The idea that they were pleasure ships is a bit silly and Its generally thought that Mon Cal Ships are actually purpose built warships anyway.
Light cruisers or Calamarian Destroyers, one of those. But remember, it has been stated many times that the Calamarian people were pacifist and disliked war immensely, and before the Empire occupied them and they rose up by converting farming tools into weapons and driving the Imperials from their world, that they knew nothing about war (or forgot it).

Remember, only a few Calamarian warriors fought in the Clone Wars, most of the fighting on Mon Calamari was by the Republic.

The Calamarians may have updated some of the later ships built from the designs the Quarren did. It was the Separatist Quarren who built the Providences.

And also, on the subject of usefulness of BulkCruisers, why did the Death Star II destroy a Bulk Cruiser at Endor during the fleet combat, when there was likely one larger and better ship to hit (though, I admit it might've been simply due to the Urjani being the only ship available to destroy without hitting the Imperial Fleet)
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Post by Isolder74 »

The Death Star Destroyed a Liberty type Mon Cal Cruiser and a Nebulon-B Frigate on screen.


I'm very sure that no Bulk Cruisers were present at the Battle of Endor.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

The Bulk Cruiser he's talking about is from the X-Wing Alliance computer game. The targets might have been limited (due to the Rebel fleet closing to point blank range with the Imperial fleet), or the Death Star might have even been picking its targets arbitrarily, to drag on Palpatine's stupid, egotistical game. Even an MC80 Star Cruiser wasn't nearly the best ship they could have destroyed, seeing as how there was more than one Home One type ship there.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

Jim Raynor wrote:The Bulk Cruiser he's talking about is from the X-Wing Alliance computer game. The targets might have been limited (due to the Rebel fleet closing to point blank range with the Imperial fleet), or the Death Star might have even been picking its targets arbitrarily, to drag on Palpatine's stupid, egotistical game. Even an MC80 Star Cruiser wasn't nearly the best ship they could have destroyed, seeing as how there was more than one Home One type ship there.
Perhaps this is why the DS2 blasted one of them...the Defiance.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
drachefly
Jedi Master
Posts: 1323
Joined: 2004-10-13 12:24pm

Post by drachefly »

LeftWingExtremist wrote:The problem is that bulk cruisers are physically larger than ships more powerful than it. So in material costs its more expensive as well as being less powerful than most ships smaller than it.
Materials costs may be insignificant compared to the costs due to complexity. Compare the cost, today, of a destroyer vs a supertanker.

Suppose, for example, that a bulk freighter uses heavier armor to make up for second-rate shields. That could be much much cheaper, but it would end up being heavier and slower.

Similarly for power generation, weapons, sensors, and so forth.
User avatar
Jade Falcon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1705
Joined: 2004-07-27 06:22pm
Location: Jade Falcon HQ, Ayr, Scotland, UK
Contact:

Post by Jade Falcon »

It's possible that Bulk Cruiser are merchant hulls hastily converted.

If you want an example from another franchise look at the Wing Commander novels and games. The TCS Tarawa is an Escort Carrier, basically a transport ship with uprated engines from a Gilgamesh class destroyer and a flight deck hastily mated to the hull with some rudimentary weapons. Carrying a single squadron of fighters its not anywhere near the equivalent of Fleet carriers but they do in an emergency.

Maybe Bulk Cruisers are the product of similiar thinking. After all, the Rebel Alliance, as well as mercenary and pirate groups often don't have the latest technology, and some will make do with whatever they can get.
Don't Move you're surrounded by Armed Bastards - Gene Hunt's attempt at Diplomacy

I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own - Number 6

The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.
User avatar
Warsie
BANNED
Posts: 521
Joined: 2007-03-06 02:08pm
Location: Chicago, IL USA

Post by Warsie »

Isolder74 wrote:The Death Star Destroyed a Liberty type Mon Cal Cruiser and a Nebulon-B Frigate on screen.


I'm very sure that no Bulk Cruisers were present at the Battle of Endor.
as Raynor said, I'm referring to the Urjani from XWA.

And a Nebulon-B wss destroyed? I didn't see that.
User avatar
The Original Nex
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: 2004-10-18 03:01pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by The Original Nex »

Isolder74 wrote:The Death Star Destroyed a Liberty type Mon Cal Cruiser and a Nebulon-B Frigate on screen.


I'm very sure that no Bulk Cruisers were present at the Battle of Endor.
No it destroyed two Mon Cal cruisers on screen. A Liberty-type, and a Home One-type.
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

The horrible KJA story where IG-88 plans to conquer the entire galaxy mentioned that some frigates were taken out by the superlaser.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Post by Isolder74 »

Jim Raynor wrote:The horrible KJA story where IG-88 plans to conquer the entire galaxy mentioned that some frigates were taken out by the superlaser.
The Medical Frigate is seen hit in the comic version of the Battle.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Warsie
BANNED
Posts: 521
Joined: 2007-03-06 02:08pm
Location: Chicago, IL USA

Post by Warsie »

Jim Raynor wrote:The horrible KJA story where IG-88 plans to conquer the entire galaxy mentioned that some frigates were taken out by the superlaser.
Okay, thank you
Isolder74 wrote:The Medical Frigate is seen hit in the comic version of the Battle.
Directly or indirectly? Damn, the DS II has good aim then. Was it a direct hit, or was it destroyed in collateral damage, as in being in the superlaser's path on the way to the superlaser's intended target.

If that did happen, did it happen during fleet combat when the Imperators could tell the DS the coordinates of the Rebel ships, etc?

Yeah, I forgot the Comic versions. The SW manga for ROTJ shows a Home One-type ship cleaved in half by the first DSII's shot
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Post by Isolder74 »

well the frame shows the Falcon flying under the exploding Frigate while its being hit, and the blast going right through, so its rather hard to tell. My copy of the comic is at another house so I can't scan it to show.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Warsie
BANNED
Posts: 521
Joined: 2007-03-06 02:08pm
Location: Chicago, IL USA

Post by Warsie »

Isolder74 wrote:well the frame shows the Falcon flying under the exploding Frigate while its being hit, and the blast going right through, so its rather hard to tell. My copy of the comic is at another house so I can't scan it to show.
going right through?

Okay. Based on what you said, the beam can be changed in thickness, but it's hard to tell. Okay. Hopefully I'll also scan the SW manga/take a picture of it to show soon with the DS shots.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

LeftWingExtremist wrote: The problem is that bulk cruisers are physically larger than ships more powerful than it. So in material costs its more expensive as well as being less powerful than most ships smaller than it.
First off:

Second, what part of "cheap", "mass produced" and "second rate" did you not understand? Warships like the Venator and Imperator are built as frontline, top quality starships and are quite effective for their size/tonnage. By contrast, the separatist ships are much less effective, but also cheaper and easier to construct. A bulk cruiser could very well be built with less powerful weaponry and shielding, slower engines, less effective detection and comm gear, and so on and so forth. It may be highly modular. It may use less effective armour or construction materials (Cheaper, ,but less durable.) to save on costs. Such concepts are not unknown in real life.

The movie tends to suggest they are a much cheaper version of the ISDs or their corellian equivalents (The Big Corellian ships) but they may also have a cargo or carrier role as well (as I said, they could be modular or multi-function, again like Separatist ships.)
Post Reply