God's Ph.D Turned down.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2003-01-03 09:44pm

kojikun wrote:Supposedly, uncircumcise guys are more sensitive. That would indicate that circumcision reduces pleasure during sex

As a uncircumsized male, I merely warn against the incredible sensitivity in other ways. One, always be well lubricated. Two, be really careful. It hurts like a FUCKER under the foreskin.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-01-03 10:00pm

SirNitram wrote:As a uncircumsized male, I merely warn against the incredible sensitivity in other ways. One, always be well lubricated. Two, be really careful. It hurts like a FUCKER under the foreskin.

I suppose, in that case, that the only real argument for circumcision is that it decreases the amount of pain you will recieve when hit in that area

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2003-01-03 10:03pm

Crayz9000 wrote:
SirNitram wrote:As a uncircumsized male, I merely warn against the incredible sensitivity in other ways. One, always be well lubricated. Two, be really careful. It hurts like a FUCKER under the foreskin.
I suppose, in that case, that the only real argument for circumcision is that it decreases the amount of pain you will recieve when hit in that area

Being hit is no problem. I've got a protective layer of skin over Mr. Happy. It's being hit when Mr. Happy is standing at attention and coming out of the barn.

SyntaxVorlon · Post by **SyntaxVorlon** » 2003-01-03 10:28pm

kojikun wrote:Actually Simon, Yahweh is the "official" name of god, but youre not supposed to say it because supposedly it envokes him and gives you power over him (some, god, huh? ) Which is why jews will replace Yahweh with Adonai when reading the Torah. But apparently the ancient Hebrews never gave good pronounciation notes on their writing so noone knows precisely how to say "YHWH".

Technically, because the vowels are always left out, Yahweh is simply the infered name. One could call god YahooWahoo or YohoWoho or something else. I've heard actually that Yahoo is an excepted name for god.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-01-03 10:36pm

HemlockGrey wrote:Regardless, I would much rather be circumcised than not. Removal of the foreskin for easy cleaning does not equate to castration.

Perhaps you should cut off your ears for easy cleaning of the skin behind them, too.

Further, it is a reach as a criticism because it does no objective harm anyway.

Please look up "objective" in a dictionary. The damage done to your foreskin from circumcision is 100% objective. It is the value judgement you choose to place on its loss which is subjective.

Falcon · Post by **Falcon** » 2003-01-03 10:38pm

Circumcision was a representation of the seperation of the Jews from everyone else. The old law no longer applies, the Jews just don't realize it.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-01-03 10:47pm

Falcon wrote:Circumcision was a representation of the seperation of the Jews from everyone else. The old law no longer applies, the Jews just don't realize it.

Because they don't care for the New Law perhaps?

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-01-03 11:42pm

Old Law, New Law, both from the same "unchanging" God

No wonder he got turned down for his PhD.

Exonerate · Post by **Exonerate** » 2003-01-03 11:44pm

- Fails to accept new theories in light of evidence.

SyntaxVorlon · Post by **SyntaxVorlon** » 2003-01-04 12:00am

-Attempts to explain that he created the universe when there is no real record of the Yahoo before the Isrealites formed in Dynastic Egypt.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-01-04 12:00am

SyntaxVorlon wrote:-Attempts to explain that he created the universe when there is no real record of the Yahoo before the Isrealites formed in Dynastic Egypt.

In other words, taking credit for work he didn't do. Very bad.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-01-04 12:57am

Darth Wong wrote:Old Law, New Law, both from the same "unchanging" God

No wonder he got turned down for his PhD.

Well, as I understand, most of the "Old Law", like Deuteronomy, was written by the Levites. Only the Ten Commandments came straight from God.

In that case, he's not contradicting himself; he's contradicting men.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2003-01-04 02:28am

* God's experiments in biology have a 100% mortality rate.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-01-04 02:32am

He claims to have invented 100% of the animal species in the history of this planet, but refuses to comment on the fact that 98% of them have gone extinct.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2003-01-04 02:38am

* Failure to refine the evolutionary process in order to more effectively weed out errors like eyeballs wired inefficiently.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-01-04 02:42am

Claims responsibility for John Asscroft.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2003-01-04 02:52am

* Hasn't shared the knowledge granted to him by omniscience with the scientific community.

Kosh_The_Vorlon · Post by **Kosh_The_Vorlon** » 2003-01-04 03:57am

-Doesn't exist

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-01-04 04:16am

Indeed, most scholars believe that "God" is a mere pseudonym for a number of ghost writers pushing various political and fund-raising agendas.

SeebianWurm · Post by **SeebianWurm** » 2003-01-04 04:27am

Just a more authoritative spin on "anonymous"

Post by **Vympel** » 2003-01-04 04:42am

Ahhh SD.net. where a topic about God's PHD gets dragged off on a tangent about circumcision.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-01-04 05:18am

- Usually contacts people when they are hallucinating

Post by **NecronLord** » 2003-01-04 09:07am

-Tried to ban anal sex.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-01-04 02:33pm

-Some have claimed they were told by him to scare gullible suckers into following him, and then taking their money
-He refuses to reveal his true identity

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-01-05 06:23am

- Supports the great buffoon Jack T. Chick