Mystery of the Great Pyramid solved

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Sam Or I
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1894
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:57am
Contact:

Mystery of the Great Pyramid solved

Post by Sam Or I »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6514155.stm
A French architect claims to have solved the mystery of how Egypt's Great Pyramid was built.
Jean-Pierre Houdin said the 4,500-year-old pyramid, just outside Cairo, was built using an inner ramp to lift the massive stones into place.

Other theories contend that the three million stones - each 2.5 tons - were pushed into place using external ramps.

Mr Houdin studied the problem for eight years and used a computer model to illustrate how he thought it was done.

"This is better than the other theories, because it is the only theory that works," said Mr Houdin as he unveiled his theory with a 3D computer simulation.

He believes workers used an outer ramp to build the first 43 metres (47 yards) then constructed an inner ramp to carry stones to the apex of the 137m pyramid.

The pyramid was built to house the tomb of Pharaoh Khufu, also known as Cheops.

The Grand Gallery inside the pyramid, another source of mystery for Egyptologists, housed a giant counter-weight used to hoist five 60 ton granite beams into position above the King's Chamber.


Internal counterweights also helped move the massive stones
"This goes against both main existing theories," Egyptologist Bob Brier told Reuters news agency after Mr Houdin explained his hypothesis.

"I've been teaching them myself for 20 years but deep down I know they're wrong."

Mr Houdin said that an outer ramp all the way to the top of the pyramid would have blocked sight lines and left little room to work, while a long, frontal ramp would have used up too much stone.

Further confusing matters, there is little evidence left of external ramps at the site of the Great Pyramid.

Mr Houdin said the pyramid could have been built by 4,000 people using his technique instead of 100,000, as postulated by other theorists.

The architect is now assembling a team to verify his theory on site using radars and other non-invasive means.
Image
Image
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Further confusing matters, there is little evidence left of external ramps at the site of the Great Pyramid.
Well, that cinches it! :roll:

Of course evidence for external ramps is lacking, you dolt, you don't leave construction debris at building sites when you're finished with projects today, why would they back then when they were building a god king's tomb?
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
2000AD
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6666
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:32pm
Location: Leeds, wishing i was still in Newcastle

Post by 2000AD »

I thought we knew how they were built ages ago?
Ph34r teh eyebrow!!11!Writers Guild Sluggite Pawn of Chaos WYGIWYGAINGW so now i have to put ACPATHNTDWATGODW in my sig EBC-Honorary Geordie
Hammerman! Hammer!
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Post by Wyrm »

This guy is taking stupid pills. How the hell does an inner ramp solve anything? You're still pushing heavy stones up a fucking ramp, except now your ramp is limited by the dimensions of the pyramid. Also, how the hell are the Ancient Egyptians expected to support a network of tunnels inside when they had to bring the sides of the central hall in over fifteen meters before they could bridge the gap?
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
Velthuijsen
Padawan Learner
Posts: 235
Joined: 2003-03-07 06:45pm

Post by Velthuijsen »

He claims that the inner ramps solve the problem by having access to counterweights to move the blocks up. That still leaves the other problem you addressed though, size of the passageways inside.
Velthuijsen
Padawan Learner
Posts: 235
Joined: 2003-03-07 06:45pm

Post by Velthuijsen »

Ghetto edit:
On looking at that image there are no closed passageways. That said he has a way to test his theory because these ramps would leave smooth lines down behind.
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

You know, the thing here is I don't think its a bad idea... The problem is we got some bozo going on about "Solving The Mystry" of the pyramids.

The truth is the Pyramids where no doubt built using a Variety of methods, yet everyone so often you get some crackput who thinks he has the golden goose and knows that HIS way is the right way and the oNLY way.
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Post by Wyrm »

Velthuijsen wrote:He claims that the inner ramps solve the problem by having access to counterweights to move the blocks up. That still leaves the other problem you addressed though, size of the passageways inside.
It's also clear from the illustration that the Egyptians were using pulleys to accomplish this task. And this is the computer model of the only way it could work? Well, news flash for Misseur Houdin: the Egyptians didn't have the required pulley; they didn't even have the wheel! How does Houdin expect the Egyptians to use technology they plain didn't have to build thier largest monuments?

Any counterweight system constructed by the Egyptians would reqiure rope to slide over mud-clad logs. But the ropes would quickly become mud-soaked and shred themselves in short order; the Egyptians would be going through hemp like it was going out of style. It also requires much heavier counterweights, because so much is lost to friction.

As I said before, this guy is taking stupid pills.
Velthuijsen wrote:Ghetto edit:
On looking at that image there are no closed passageways. That said he has a way to test his theory because these ramps would leave smooth lines down behind.
Not in the main gallery, they wouldn't. If there were rutts left in the main gallery after they were finished building, don't you think that workers would smooth them down? This is the god-king's burial chamber, fer cryin' out loud.
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Re: Mystery of the Great Pyramid solved

Post by Darth Servo »

"I've been teaching them myself for 20 years but deep down I know they're wrong."
Oh right. Gut instinct. Surely thats the best way to refute existing theories. This kind of crackpottery is precisely the justification for baring pseudoscientists from the field.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
Velthuijsen
Padawan Learner
Posts: 235
Joined: 2003-03-07 06:45pm

Post by Velthuijsen »

Wyrm wrote:It's also clear from the illustration that the Egyptians were using pulleys to accomplish this task. And this is the computer model of the only way it could work? Well, news flash for Misseur Houdin: the Egyptians didn't have the required pulley; they didn't even have the wheel! How does Houdin expect the Egyptians to use technology they plain didn't have to build thier largest monuments?
the little online browsing (seeing that I'm not an historian for ancient Egypt) I've done seems to indicate that the Egyptians knew of the pulley before they got invaded by the Hyksos.
The chariot didn't appear until the Hyksos decided to pay a visit. That doesn't mean they didn't know the wheel. There are burial images of potters using a pottery wheel from around the time that those pyramids were build. Or the puppets (from the dynasties from before the chariot was introduced) that moved using a system of ropes and a pulley.
Wyrm wrote:Not in the main gallery, they wouldn't. If there were rutts left in the main gallery after they were finished building, don't you think that workers would smooth them down? This is the god-king's burial chamber, fer cryin' out loud.
There are multiple internal ramps on that picture, one in the main gallery, but also one on the other side. And even then regardless of if they used a pulley or the rope around a log there should be indications where those were supported in/by the surrounding stone. So at least the hypothesis is provable.
User avatar
Dahak
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7292
Joined: 2002-10-29 12:08pm
Location: Admiralty House, Landing, Manticore
Contact:

Post by Dahak »

2000AD wrote:I thought we knew how they were built ages ago?
There are several theories. But it seems that there is not one that seems to solve the "mystery" convincingly enough so that egyptologists are to this day battling over the topic.
Image
Great Dolphin Conspiracy - Chatter box
"Implications: we have been intercepted deliberately by a means unknown, for a purpose unknown, and transferred to a place unknown by a form of intelligence unknown. Apart from the unknown, everything is obvious." ZORAC
GALE Force Euro Wimp
Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority.
Image
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Post by Wyrm »

Velthuijsen wrote:the little online browsing (seeing that I'm not an historian for ancient Egypt) I've done seems to indicate that the Egyptians knew of the pulley before they got invaded by the Hyksos.
The chariot didn't appear until the Hyksos decided to pay a visit. That doesn't mean they didn't know the wheel. There are burial images of potters using a pottery wheel from around the time that those pyramids were build. Or the puppets (from the dynasties from before the chariot was introduced) that moved using a system of ropes and a pulley.
A valid point. And I do seem to remember that there were models of carts, so I take back what I said about the wheel.

That doesn't mean that they used pulleys to build pyramids. See, there's this little matter of engineering: stone blocks are heavy things, tens of tons each for a core block. Even sliding up a ramp, that's still around ten tons of force that the pulley's axel has to support. Pulleys good enough to do the job didn't exist in the bronze age. So you're back to mudded logs and ropes, and all the problems associated with them.
Velthuijsen wrote:There are multiple internal ramps on that picture, one in the main gallery, but also one on the other side. And even then regardless of if they used a pulley or the rope around a log there should be indications where those were supported in/by the surrounding stone. So at least the hypothesis is provable.
Except the hypothesis is wrong on its face. Misseur Houdin forgets a large sticking point about the limits of stone. Until the large burial chamber was complete and covered, the large, 60 ton granite beams couldn't support themselves over a span that large. They would require inthrust forces to squish them together and keep them from snapping under thier own weight. These inthrust forces wouldn't exist until they built up the pyramid high enough. Until then, they had to be supported by other means, and the only means availible to the Egyptians was to fill the main chamber with sand.

There are no stone shutters between the main chamber and the grand gallery, so in order to keep the main chamber filled with sand, they had to fill the grand gallery with sand as well. (All of the entry chambers to the pyramid would be filled with sand while the pyramid was being constructed.) They couldn't use the grand gallery as a ramp, because it was filled with sand!

You have to remember, that without the arch, spanning large disances (as required for ceilings) is a bitch with stone. Hell, it's a bitch even with the arch, but it's a bitch-on-wheels without. Therefore, Egyptian engineers would want to keep the number of internal tunnels to a bare minimum. Therefore, if they could build a pyramid without any internal ramps, they would've.

Look at the Giza pyramids today. Their outer casing stones have been stripped, leaving clearly-visible access tunnels where workers could breathe and escape after dropping stones in the grand gallery to plug up access. If they couldn't afford to fill these holes up all the way, what makes you think that they could fill up the great ramps where they dragged up multiton blocks of stone?

Even if the pyramid builders could afford to plug up the ramps with stone rather than simply covering them up cosmetically, then you win yourself a new problem. The stones will be skew to the rest of the pyramid blocks, and they wouldn't bother finishing them straight (they'd just put in a casing stone of the proper shape), which we don't see. Further, in order to drop stones in, you'd have to have them sitting on a platform outside, up on where they were intended to be, and dropped in. This requires a lot of platform space. But if they could build such a platform, why not build a wide ramp around the outside and simply drag them those stones up with brute muscle power?

Yes, it would take thousands of workers, but you're a great king; you GOT thousands of workers! And while the Nile was flooded, they couldn't farm anyway.

So, if the Egyptians could afford to fill their internal construction ramps with stone, then they don't need internal construction ramps. Therefore, they wouldn't use them.
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
Post Reply