Latest creationist moron [April 12, 2007]

Karmic Knight · Post by **Karmic Knight** » 2007-04-13 04:46pm

The Vortex Empire wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:All these comparisons between oxygen and God make me wonder... is God combustible?

Good question. Hmm. Well, he supposedly made humans in his own image, and we are combustible, so I would say yes.

That would explain the burning bush.

Ritterin Sophia · Post by **Ritterin Sophia** » 2007-04-13 04:46pm

DPDarkPrimus wrote:All these comparisons between oxygen and God make me wonder... is God combustible?

Of course he is, why do you thing the real hero of the Bible surrounds himself in Fire?

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2007-04-13 05:06pm

The Computer Wizard wrote:Oxygen has many of the same properties of God, you cant smell it, touch it, taste it or hear it, but does that mean it is not there?

You really are an idiot, you know that? Ever picked up an oxygen tank? You can measure oxygen. Ever measured God?

Macro Evolution
Micro Evolution
Look these terms up in your dictionary, one is how plants and animals change to fit a situation or circumstance, and one is how a rock evolves into a rose.

Wow. You honestly believe that you just gave correct definitions, don't you?

It's always amazing that these people who literally have about a grade 6 grasp of science seem to think they can mount a powerful argument on a science-related subject.

The Vortex Empire · Post by **The Vortex Empire** » 2007-04-13 05:08pm

Darth Wong wrote:
The Computer Wizard wrote:Oxygen has many of the same properties of God, you cant smell it, touch it, taste it or hear it, but does that mean it is not there?
You really are an idiot, you know that? Ever picked up an oxygen tank? You can measure oxygen. Ever measured God?
Macro Evolution
Micro Evolution
Look these terms up in your dictionary, one is how plants and animals change to fit a situation or circumstance, and one is how a rock evolves into a rose.
Wow. You honestly believe that you just gave correct definitions, don't you?

It's always amazing that these people who literally have about a grade 6 grasp of science seem to think they can mount a powerful argument on a science-related subject.

There's no point in responding to his posts anymore, he's gone.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2007-04-13 05:09pm

Mike, he's already run away with his tail between his legs.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2007-04-13 05:12pm

Darth Servo wrote:Mike, he's already run away with his tail between his legs.

He's most likely still reading. He's a huge pussy, not someone with better things to do.

R. U. Serious · Post by **R. U. Serious** » 2007-04-13 05:27pm

He's at the Community College in Lousiana, I am sure he has enough time on his hands... ^^

Ariphaos · Post by **Ariphaos** » 2007-04-13 06:52pm

The Computer Wizard wrote:Oxygen has many of the same properties of God, you cant smell it, touch it, taste it or hear it, but does that mean it is not there? Of course it is there. The only way that you can know that there is no God is to know everything about everything, which would *make* you omnipotent, and if you know everything, then that would make you God.

...reminds me of my first smackdown, I was fourteen, the idiot was 26. His quote: "Air is intangible, think about that."

But we do touch it - what's that feeling when you swing your arm, hold your breath...? Because we most certainly can. Through fire, we can see it in action and analyze its properties. It does not normally make sound but it is a carrier for such, it can be liquefied, which also can be seen, or made into ozone, which can be smelled.

Really, that piece of idiocy belongs on fstdt if noone's submitted already.

Ma Deuce · Post by **Ma Deuce** » 2007-04-13 07:04pm

So, who wants to bet he'll come back in the somewhat-distant future with his next brilliant argument after most of us have forgotten about this incident?

Rye · Post by **Rye** » 2007-04-13 07:22pm

The Computer Wizard wrote:Oxygen has many of the same properties of God, you cant smell it, touch it, taste it or hear it, but does that mean it is not there?

If oxygen had no measurable influence on the world (and by that I do NOT refer to emotions), how would it have been identified in the first place? Seriously, that's such a lame analogy, I can get an oxygen tank and blow oxygen on my hand and hear it hissing. I can also see it when it first gets sprayed, you can see any gas distorting the air, and you can see it expand if you spray it in a vacuum.

Of course it is there. The only way that you can know that there is no God is to know everything about everything, which would *make* you omnipotent, and if you know everything, then that would make you God.

Firstly, you got your omnis fucked up; omnipotence is to do with power, not knowledge (omniscience).

The only way that you can know that there is no antiGod is to know everything about everything, which means if you are theistic and you are logically consistent, you must believe in antigod as well as God. If you do that, antigod negates God and you must believe he's nonexistent.

Lianardo Da'Vinci once was quoted as saying, "In the absense of evidence of any other sort [the Bible and general nature] my thumb alone would convince me of a creator.

Glen Benton, the lead singer of Deicide said, "Book of god, it is a fable."

Macro Evolution
Micro Evolution
Look these terms up in your dictionary, one is how plants and animals change to fit a situation or circumstance, and one is how a rock evolves into a rose.

Look up the word "liar" in the dictionary.

Lonestar · Post by **Lonestar** » 2007-04-14 12:00am

R. U. Serious wrote:He's at the Community College in Lousiana, I am sure he has enough time on his hands... ^^

What, like drinking high-quality H2O and making sure the Muddogs make it to the Bourbon Bowl?

Teleros · Post by **Teleros** » 2007-04-14 09:14am

Ma Deuce wrote:So, who wants to bet he'll come back in the somewhat-distant future with his next brilliant argument after most of us have forgotten about this incident?

We always hope

.

mr friendly guy · Post by **mr friendly guy** » 2007-04-14 11:59am

Xeriar wrote:reminds me of my first smackdown, I was fourteen, the idiot was 26. His quote: "Air is intangible, think about that."

But we do touch it - what's that feeling when you swing your arm, hold your breath...? Because we most certainly can. Through fire, we can see it in action and analyze its properties. It does not normally make sound but it is a carrier for such, it can be liquefied, which also can be seen, or made into ozone, which can be smelled.

Really, that piece of idiocy belongs on fstdt if noone's submitted already.

Has he not heard of the wind, or better yet feel it brushing across his face or how about flown a kite.

Tricit · Post by **Tricit** » 2007-04-14 12:55pm

So far the response I got was that the creationist will get back to me.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2007-04-14 02:35pm

Tricit wrote:So far the response I got was that the creationist will get back to me.

I love that one. So many times I've mentioned something in the Bible which is either embarrassing or contradictory, and I get something like "I'll check that passage and get back to you" or "I'll talk to my youth minister and get back to you" or "I'll talk to my prayer group and get back to you." They almost never do. The few times they do come back to you, they try to change the subject, as if the previous conversation never happened. It often goes like this:

"Hello again."
"So, did you look up that passage?"
"Yes I did. But I think you're missing the point."
"And what's the point?"
"Salvation in Christ Jesus."

PeZook · Post by **PeZook** » 2007-04-14 02:58pm

Oh my...

Does he really think that Kent Hovind is a master debater? Doesn't he "debate" using a powerpoint presentation with pre-set arguments on it, which he doesn't let his opponents see beforehand? And audiences stacked with pro-creationist morons?

If that's Computer Wizard's standard of good debating, it's a small wonder he'll end up being a tiny, insignificant spot on SD.net's radar.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2007-04-14 03:23pm

PeZook wrote:Oh my...

Does he really think that Kent Hovind is a master debater? Doesn't he "debate" using a powerpoint presentation with pre-set arguments on it, which he doesn't let his opponents see beforehand? And audiences stacked with pro-creationist morons?

If that's Computer Wizard's standard of good debating, it's a small wonder he'll end up being a tiny, insignificant spot on SD.net's radar.

The really sad thing is that before I did the IP check, I would have bet good money that he was just a kiddie, maybe 15 years old at most, based on his argument technique. Then I find out he's going to community college, which means he must have graduated high school. Scary.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2007-04-14 03:58pm

Darth Wong wrote:The really sad thing is that before I did the IP check, I would have bet good money that he was just a kiddie, maybe 15 years old at most, based on his argument technique. Then I find out he's going to community college, which means he must have graduated high school. Scary.

Not necessarily. He could have been home-schooled. He is from "the-middle-of-nowhere, Louisiana" after all.

CaptHawkeye · Post by **CaptHawkeye** » 2007-04-14 04:18pm

So he's from the South? I wonder what his views on the Confederacy and Civil War are. Based on what we've seen, I bet he's one of those pansy slavery apologists too.

Ariphaos · Post by **Ariphaos** » 2007-04-14 04:34pm

Darth Wong wrote: The really sad thing is that before I did the IP check, I would have bet good money that he was just a kiddie, maybe 15 years old at most, based on his argument technique. Then I find out he's going to community college, which means he must have graduated high school. Scary.

PSEO options, at least in Minnesota, don't make this certain, he could still be as young as 15. You might laugh, but some really stupid people do get into PSEO, including creationist fundies.

Post by **Colonel Olrik** » 2007-04-14 04:37pm

Darth Wong wrote: The really sad thing is that before I did the IP check, I would have bet good money that he was just a kiddie, maybe 15 years old at most, based on his argument technique. Then I find out he's going to community college, which means he must have graduated high school. Scary.

As a happy-feel-good story, I'll tell you about a guy I met these last three days, while attending a conference in Warsaw. He's a 30 years old Brit who has now a MSc in Biology and a PhD in some sort of computer science. Great guy. We started talking in the first day and at some point the conversation went to his past.

It turns out that he was raised a fundamentalist Christian, and as old as the age of 20 he was more hardcore into it than his own parents. Even got married (virgin) to another one like him. Anyway, he decided to take a degree in Biology and made helping to prove Evolution wrong the theme of his thesis. He investigated, he researched, and he became an atheist

His wife divorced him, but he got married again recently and apparently his new, non-fundamentalist wife enjoys anal..

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2007-04-14 06:31pm

Colonel Olrik wrote:His wife divorced him, but he got married again recently and apparently his new, non-fundamentalist wife enjoys anal..

On a related note, it happened twice (while Rebecca was still Christian) that her congregation found out about my lack of faith. In both cases, they immediately tried to separate us, inviting her to various events and telling her to make sure I didn't come, etc. So much for "family values".

Ritterin Sophia · Post by **Ritterin Sophia** » 2007-04-14 08:40pm

I find that Theism takes a level of ignorance I can't be bothered to gain... I recently ran into a Christian whom asked have we ever seen evolution, I pointed out virus' and bacteria, he said that's not evolution, it's living organisms adapting to their environment.

wolveraptor · Post by **wolveraptor** » 2007-04-15 12:13pm

AdmiralKanos wrote:On a related note, it happened twice (while Rebecca was still Christian) that her congregation found out about my lack of faith. In both cases, they immediately tried to separate us, inviting her to various events and telling her to make sure I didn't come, etc. So much for "family values".

And what, tried to introduce her to other men? Man, that is a dick move. It's almost out of one of those shitty romantic comedies that appear every summer.

Does he really think that Kent Hovind is a master debater?

I think Hovind's a masterdebater.

VT-16 · Post by **VT-16** » 2007-04-15 05:44pm

Macro Evolution
Micro Evolution

Another moron who can't comprehend how one follows from another and think he's being clever by seperating them?

Look these terms up in your dictionary, one is how plants and animals change to fit a situation or circumstance, and one is how a rock evolves into a rose.

Guess this answers my question.