Product-wise, it's not a failure. Marketshare-wise, it's not a failure.Hotfoot wrote:Actually, reports from 2001 indicate that they did sell the Gamecube at a small loss (under $20), but regardless, it's not near the "norm". Unfortunately, such data seems to be spare the further back you go. If it started with the PS1, however, that's a long term trend, as it goes back to 1994. I'm pretty sure it goes back further than that, but I don't have any reliable numbers on that mark.
However, I still maintain that just because the 360 isn't a runaway smash like the Wii, doesn't mean it's a failure, and it's certainly not a failure just because Japan didn't pick it up.
Business-wise, it's certainly not a success; it has only lost money, and hasn't really significantly bolstered any other divisions of Microsoft. Yet.
Oh, no, you misunderstand my argument. I'm not questioning Microsoft's place in the market; they're outselling the XBox, they're going to have a significant marketshare this time around (1 year has gotten the 360 to almost half of the original XBox's sales over 4 years).So yeah, Sony done fucked up this round, and while people are still questioning Microsoft's place in the market (with some good reason), I still think it's way too early to call the game as a loss for the 360.
The Zune, of course, can go to hell.
I only question if the product is actually worthwhile to the company. You can get spectacular market- and mind-share, and still lose a bunch of money.
Totally agree on everything you said about Sony.