MIT Dean lies on her resume, gets caught, gets fired.
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Darth Mortis
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 2005-05-10 11:18am
MIT Dean lies on her resume, gets caught, gets fired.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/ ... index.html
From Zak Sos and Richard Davis
CNN
Adjust font size:
(CNN) -- The dean of admissions at one of America's most prestigious schools resigned on Thursday after the university discovered she had lied about her academic credentials.
Marilee Jones, who joined the staff of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1979 to lead the recruitment of women at the university, stepped down from her post after admitting that she had "misrepresented her academic degrees to the institute," according to a statement posted on MIT's Web site.
"I misrepresented my academic degrees when I first applied to MIT 28 years ago and did not have the courage to correct my resume when I applied for my current job or at any time since," Jones said in a posting on the school's Web site.
"I am deeply sorry for this and for disappointing so many in the MIT community and beyond who supported me, believed in me, and who have given me extraordinary opportunities."
Patti Richards, spokeswoman for MIT, said the school had received information about Jones' credentials and investigated them. "At various times she claimed to have received degrees from Albany Medical College, Rensellaer Polytechnic Institute, and Union College and we confirmed that she had not graduated from any of these schools."
"This is a sad and unfortunate event," said Daniel E. Hastings, dean for undergraduate education at the Cambridge school, in a Web posting. "But the integrity of the institute is our highest priority, and we cannot tolerate this kind of behavior."
Jones was named dean of admissions at MIT in 1997 and received MIT's highest award for administrators, the "MIT Excellence Award for Leading Change." She was also the 2006 winner of the "Gordon Y Billard Award" given "for special service of outstanding merit" performed for the school.
Stuart Schmill, MIT's senior associate director of admissions, has been named the interim director of admissions.
Jesus Christ, what an idiot. [/u]
From Zak Sos and Richard Davis
CNN
Adjust font size:
(CNN) -- The dean of admissions at one of America's most prestigious schools resigned on Thursday after the university discovered she had lied about her academic credentials.
Marilee Jones, who joined the staff of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1979 to lead the recruitment of women at the university, stepped down from her post after admitting that she had "misrepresented her academic degrees to the institute," according to a statement posted on MIT's Web site.
"I misrepresented my academic degrees when I first applied to MIT 28 years ago and did not have the courage to correct my resume when I applied for my current job or at any time since," Jones said in a posting on the school's Web site.
"I am deeply sorry for this and for disappointing so many in the MIT community and beyond who supported me, believed in me, and who have given me extraordinary opportunities."
Patti Richards, spokeswoman for MIT, said the school had received information about Jones' credentials and investigated them. "At various times she claimed to have received degrees from Albany Medical College, Rensellaer Polytechnic Institute, and Union College and we confirmed that she had not graduated from any of these schools."
"This is a sad and unfortunate event," said Daniel E. Hastings, dean for undergraduate education at the Cambridge school, in a Web posting. "But the integrity of the institute is our highest priority, and we cannot tolerate this kind of behavior."
Jones was named dean of admissions at MIT in 1997 and received MIT's highest award for administrators, the "MIT Excellence Award for Leading Change." She was also the 2006 winner of the "Gordon Y Billard Award" given "for special service of outstanding merit" performed for the school.
Stuart Schmill, MIT's senior associate director of admissions, has been named the interim director of admissions.
Jesus Christ, what an idiot. [/u]
Tis but a flesh would- The Black Knight
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
- Darth Mortis
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 2005-05-10 11:18am
- Darth Mortis
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 2005-05-10 11:18am
- Coyote
- Rabid Monkey
- Posts: 12464
- Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
- Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
- Contact:
Makes me wonder what started an investigation on her in the first place, after 28 years of work there with, apparantly, no complaints worth mentioning.
Which brings the question-- if someone manages to get hired under fraudulent circumstances, but they do a fine job and everyone's happy, is it worth it to just sweep it under the rug if you're the boss that finds out? Especially after over two decades of work?
Obviously it would make a difference if it was someone practicing medecine without a liscence, etc, but in an office type job where no risk of injury/death to others is a possibility... is the letter of the law necessary in that case?
Which brings the question-- if someone manages to get hired under fraudulent circumstances, but they do a fine job and everyone's happy, is it worth it to just sweep it under the rug if you're the boss that finds out? Especially after over two decades of work?
Obviously it would make a difference if it was someone practicing medecine without a liscence, etc, but in an office type job where no risk of injury/death to others is a possibility... is the letter of the law necessary in that case?
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Or they were simply covering their asses and didn't want to risk the possibility of a scandal. Especially if they're concerned about their public image of being an institute of integrity. Imagine how bad it'd look to have someone else uncover the errors -and- the coverup, and go straight to the press with it.Coyote wrote:Makes me wonder what started an investigation on her in the first place, after 28 years of work there with, apparantly, no complaints worth mentioning.
Which brings the question-- if someone manages to get hired under fraudulent circumstances, but they do a fine job and everyone's happy, is it worth it to just sweep it under the rug if you're the boss that finds out? Especially after over two decades of work?
Obviously it would make a difference if it was someone practicing medecine without a liscence, etc, but in an office type job where no risk of injury/death to others is a possibility... is the letter of the law necessary in that case?
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
- CmdrWilkens
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
- Location: Land of the Crabcake
- Contact:
Probably not but with the possibility of lawsuits inthe making from students who were not admitted (claiming they should have been admitted and were denied on whatever spurious reason they think denied them). Anyway if she remained in place then the school would have a damned hard time defending the idea that its admissions process is honest and fair simply because of the dean being an admitted resume padder.Coyote wrote:Makes me wonder what started an investigation on her in the first place, after 28 years of work there with, apparantly, no complaints worth mentioning.
Which brings the question-- if someone manages to get hired under fraudulent circumstances, but they do a fine job and everyone's happy, is it worth it to just sweep it under the rug if you're the boss that finds out? Especially after over two decades of work?
Obviously it would make a difference if it was someone practicing medecine without a liscence, etc, but in an office type job where no risk of injury/death to others is a possibility... is the letter of the law necessary in that case?
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Umm, yeah it’s well worth firing her. It makes MIT look very bad and it harms what integrity the US academic process has. Perhaps in a job that wasn’t at a top university it would not matter as much.Coyote wrote: Which brings the question-- if someone manages to get hired under fraudulent circumstances, but they do a fine job and everyone's happy, is it worth it to just sweep it under the rug if you're the boss that finds out? Especially after over two decades of work?
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Darth Mortis
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 2005-05-10 11:18am
I don't care if it's BumFuck U, she's fired, period.Sea Skimmer wrote:Umm, yeah it’s well worth firing her. It makes MIT look very bad and it harms what integrity the US academic process has. Perhaps in a job that wasn’t at a top university it would not matter as much.Coyote wrote: Which brings the question-- if someone manages to get hired under fraudulent circumstances, but they do a fine job and everyone's happy, is it worth it to just sweep it under the rug if you're the boss that finds out? Especially after over two decades of work?
Tis but a flesh would- The Black Knight
- kheegster
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: 2002-09-14 02:29am
- Location: An oasis in the wastelands of NJ
I'm somewhat surprised that she got that job at MIT even if the degrees she claimed to have were legitimate. I haven't heard of any of those schools she claimed to have graduated from, and I would expect an elite school like MIT to mainly hire people who went to top schools as well.
Articles, opinions and rants from an astrophysicist: Cosmic Journeys
The problem with MIT is that they started hiring career administrators and not scientists or engineers. These people would come from say, University of Michigan, and assume what worked for a huge state school would work just as well at MIT.kheegster wrote:I'm somewhat surprised that she got that job at MIT even if the degrees she claimed to have were legitimate. I haven't heard of any of those schools she claimed to have graduated from, and I would expect an elite school like MIT to mainly hire people who went to top schools as well.
Doom dOom doOM DOom doomity DooM doom Dooooom Doom DOOM!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
I'm more surprised that they didn't conduct a proper background check when they hired her. Or at least the token of one. It shouldn't have been that difficult to ring up the unis she claimed to have been from and verify that yes, she did in fact have degrees.kheegster wrote:I'm somewhat surprised that she got that job at MIT even if the degrees she claimed to have were legitimate. I haven't heard of any of those schools she claimed to have graduated from, and I would expect an elite school like MIT to mainly hire people who went to top schools as well.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Reading an article from the New York Tines, it appears the administrative assistant job she first applied for in the 70's didn't require college degrees so they didn't bother checking her credentials then. Later when she applied for the dean of admissions in 1997, MIT assumed that those universities listed on her resume since the 70's had already been checked out.General Zod wrote:I'm more surprised that they didn't conduct a proper background check when they hired her. Or at least the token of one. It shouldn't have been that difficult to ring up the unis she claimed to have been from and verify that yes, she did in fact have degrees.kheegster wrote:I'm somewhat surprised that she got that job at MIT even if the degrees she claimed to have were legitimate. I haven't heard of any of those schools she claimed to have graduated from, and I would expect an elite school like MIT to mainly hire people who went to top schools as well.
It's amusing to see how the NYT claims she was beloved by students yet couldn't actually manage to find any students to say that.
Doom dOom doOM DOom doomity DooM doom Dooooom Doom DOOM!
- Darth Mortis
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 2005-05-10 11:18am
Hey dick, I graduated from U of M, why don't you look where it ranks in quality of education before you make that remark. In addition, Michigan is private, Michigan State and Eastern Michigan are public.Spin Echo wrote:The problem with MIT is that they started hiring career administrators and not scientists or engineers. These people would come from say, University of Michigan, and assume what worked for a huge state school would work just as well at MIT.kheegster wrote:I'm somewhat surprised that she got that job at MIT even if the degrees she claimed to have were legitimate. I haven't heard of any of those schools she claimed to have graduated from, and I would expect an elite school like MIT to mainly hire people who went to top schools as well.
Tis but a flesh would- The Black Knight
- Darth Mortis
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 2005-05-10 11:18am
To back my claim
http://execed.bus.umich.edu/execdev/mic ... nking.aspx
http://execed.bus.umich.edu/execdev/mic ... nking.aspx
Recognized Excellence
Across a wide range of criteria, Michigan Executive Education and the Ross School of Business are ranked among the world's elite institutions.
Reputation and Rankings
Business Week, "Special Report on Executive Education," (October 200). Michigan Executive Education has consistently ranked among the top providers for open-enrollment programs from the inception of the Business Week biennial survey.
#3 nationwide for both open-enrollment and custom programs
#5 worldwide for custom programs
#6 worldwide for open-enrollment programs
Graded "A" for Innovation and Leadership
The Wall Street Journal "Guide to the Top Business Schools" (September 2005). The Ross School of Business MBA programs and graduates continue to be favored in this survey of corporate recruiters from large national and multinational firms
#2 national ranking overall
#1 school for recruiting minorities
#4 school for recruiting women
#2 in Marketing
#4 in Operations Management
The Financial Times' Special Report on Executive Education, 2005 (Released May 2006). The Financial Times evaluated executive education at business schools around the world across a wide range of quality criteria.
Top Ten nation-wide for open enrollment
Top Ten for quality of participants
#4 international participants
#5 international locations
#5 for course design
#6 for quality faculty
Leadership Excellence, "2005 Top Leadership Development Programs," (September 2005). This ranking evaluated university and business school-based executive education programs on criteria related to leadership development.
#1 executive education programs in North America
U.S. News and World Report, America's Best Colleges 2005, ranks Michigan:
#1 in Social Work graduate programs (ranked #1 for ten consecutive years)
#2 overall for top public universities
#2 in Management undergraduate programs
#2 in Marketing undergraduate programs
#3 in Finance undergraduate programs
in the top 10 in the Overall Best Graduate Schools for Business category.
When Business Week Online announced its "Top Ten Management Gurus," based on surveying executives worldwide, Michigan professors Dave Ulrich (rated number one), Noel Tichy, C. K. Prahalad and Michigan alumnus Gary Hamel, PhD 1990, dominated the list.
The Academy of Management Journal, in its most recent ranking (2000), ranks our faculty in the top two for research performance among business schools.
Alumni at the University of Michigan Business School number 34,000 in 97 countries, and the University of Michigan has the largest alumni network of any educational institution in the world.
The National Black MBA Association named the University of Michigan Business School the "Outstanding Educational Institution of the Year" in 2001.
Hispanic Business magazine rates the University of Michigan Business School one of the 10 best graduate schools in the nation for Hispanics.
Tis but a flesh would- The Black Knight
- Darth Mortis
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 2005-05-10 11:18am
Jeez. Don't get your panties in a twist. Did I ever say there was anything wrong with the University of Michigan? I know full well it's a quality institution. I used to live just outside of Ann Arbor. And I stand corrected, it is a private university. I just said that the administration has a one size fits all attitude and they seemed to think that things that worked for a large, diverse university would work just as well for a small technical school.Darth Mortis wrote:Hey dick, I graduated from U of M, why don't you look where it ranks in quality of education before you make that remark. In addition, Michigan is private, Michigan State and Eastern Michigan are public.
Doom dOom doOM DOom doomity DooM doom Dooooom Doom DOOM!