Which still doesn't make sense for the Imperials. Why only allow these two Thyferran houses? Why not create Bacta factories in every major city on every planet with the capablility to do so in order of the production to reach more of their troops and favoured citizens?Stark wrote:So it's a political limitation?
For the Thyferran houses, which are run by humans, it would make more sense for them increase production and profit to franchise it all over the galaxy by creating factories and exporting Vratix communities offworld, with a Vratix population on every capable planet. They've had 4000 years to do it according Wookiepedia (so take that with a grain of salt), though the original article in Adventure Journal #3 kept the actual amount of time vague.
Yes, I understand the in-universe explanation of how bacta work and how it's made. It's EU canon so unless it's retconned by TPTB there's nothing anyone can do to say otherwise.General Schatten wrote:No, Bacta can't be produced in large quantities without large quantities of Vratix, as we can see here, Bacta is produced from chemicals made inside a Vratix combined with certain plants, this is why it's only produced in any significant quantities on the Vratix' homeworld.
However, as per the OP asking whether bacta is a brain bug, I do question the original writer of the article (Michael Kogge, I just checked) for coming up with an inadequate explanation in the first place of what bacta is and how it works and made but Stackpole shouldn't have transplanted everything from there to his novel (which more people read than the Adventure Journal) directly without retconning a thing or two.
Because the idea of bacta as is can be summed up among other things by quotes such as Stark's here:
Stark wrote:Such simple biological chemical reactions obviously can't be replicated, you have to actually have one of the beasties to do it for you! That's... stupid.