
Should've happened a while ago...but hey I'm glad his WoI is being hurt by MoO.
Moderator: Vympel
Note: Mike Wong has called this page "the most wonderful example of sore-loser bad sportsmanship that I've ever seen", and suggests that I employ double-standards.
Have you ever seen his Hate Mail pages? That is the work of a sore loser, especially regarding his debate with me and his exhaustive spin-doctoring effort prefacing it. As for double-standards, how can a guy who gets so upset about some freak calling his house (Wong's so-called "ASU coward") promptly post a link purporting to give my personal information (phone number included) and not consider himself hypocritical?
Stop being stupid, Mike.
THAT is one of the funniest things that I have EVER read. It is so hypocritical, IMO, and SO unbelievable, that someone should paraphrase that and put it in a signature.XaLEv wrote:Hey, Scooter has updated his "Morality of Wong" page to respond to what Mike has said about it.
Note: Mike Wong has called this page "the most wonderful example of sore-loser bad sportsmanship that I've ever seen", and suggests that I employ double-standards.
Have you ever seen his Hate Mail pages? That is the work of a sore loser, especially regarding his debate with me and his exhaustive spin-doctoring effort prefacing it. As for double-standards, how can a guy who gets so upset about some freak calling his house (Wong's so-called "ASU coward") promptly post a link purporting to give my personal information (phone number included) and not consider himself hypocritical?
Stop being stupid, Mike.
Yes. For that matter, it seems alot of ppl on your hatemail page never think they actually lost. (Well, Edam at least seems to think your allegations about his debating and behaviour were untrue and all a cover.)Darth Wong wrote:Is Darkstar seriously trying to claim that I lost to all of the people on my Hate Mail page, so it's a sore-loser page? Is he truly that deluded?
http://www.st-v-sw.net/Wong.htmlConnor MacLeod wrote:And I *still* haven't seen this obsessive little essay of his about Mike..
[incredulous]I believe that he IS! It's astonishing that he could be that stupid. Assuming that you HAD lost to all of those people on your hatemail page, wouldn't it be a good loser who posted it to the internet to show what had happened? In any case, I'd be very interested to know how he can believe that he is not just winning the debate, but that OTHER Rabid-Trekkies are winning the debate.Darth Wong wrote:Is Darkstar seriously trying to claim that I lost to all of the people on my Hate Mail page, so it's a sore-loser page? Is he truly that deluded?
Is he referring to the Robert Scott Anderson Fan Site with that comment about personal information?Scooter wrote:Note: Mike Wong has called this page "the most wonderful example of sore-loser bad sportsmanship that I've ever seen", and suggests that I employ double-standards.
Have you ever seen his Hate Mail pages? That is the work of a sore loser, especially regarding his debate with me and his exhaustive spin-doctoring effort prefacing it. As for double-standards, how can a guy who gets so upset about some freak calling his house (Wong's so-called "ASU coward") promptly post a link purporting to give my personal information (phone number included) and not consider himself hypocritical?
Stop being stupid, Mike.
You mean he's the first person to ever convert flatulence into a form of communication? This may revolutionize speech for the speaking impaired everywhere!Darth Wong wrote:Heh heh ... I did like the Matrix pictures. But sealing off Darkstar's mouth would do little to silence him, since most of his arguments are pulled from a different orifice.
Top Ten Things Robert Scott Anderson Cannot DoIS THERE NOTHING ROBERT SCOTT ANDERSON CANNOT DO?