I need to expand on what I said a bit more, I think. I realize it may not seem like much of a distinction(and indeed by strict definition it may not), but I very purposely used the word "self-centered" and not "selfish."Surlethe wrote:How does selfishness preclude not accepting responsibility for one's actions?
As a hobby psychologist coming from parents who both worked in medical psychiatry, and who himself has dealt with a lot of issues revolving around blame and responsibility (even within my own family, and myself), there seems to be a strong correlation between how understanding and accepting a person is concerning those around him or her and that person's willingness to accept responsibility for a negative consequence which they took some role in bringing about.
You can call me jaded or perhaps a little pessimistic, and you would be right. Though I try to give every individual person the benefit of the doubt, I am well convinced our culture does not breed a healthy balance between satisfying the self and making sure that others do not suffer unnecessarily at the expense of achieving that goal.
And that brings me to the next part of my post:
I completely agree, and I think this is an argument that is valuable both to those who feel we should collectively help others manage their diets, as well as those who might otherwise want to leave well enough alone.Turin wrote:people like me (who eat healthy, don't smoke, and exercise) end up paying for it in terms of my health insurance premiums, my taxes for social services
Lol. In a not-completely-correct-but-still-funny way.CC wrote:Don't forget that when those people inevitably end up in the hospital, they put a lot of other people (paramedics, nurses, nursing assistants, transporters, techs, etc.) at serious risk of back injury.