Why is 'Natural' better?

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Redleader34
Jedi Knight
Posts: 998
Joined: 2005-10-03 03:30pm
Location: Flowing through the Animated Ether, finding unsusual creations
Contact:

Post by Redleader34 »

I'm a Filmaker,and I also disagree with their statements. I have seen Natural living in Africa. It SUCKS. I do not want to be like the vilager, who is horridly Dependant on weather, to produce their crops/. Hell, when irrigation pipes came to them, the farmers were happy. Living like some proto man in the 10,000 BC era is not my idea of a fun time.
Dan's Art

Bounty on SDN's most annoying
"A spambot, a spambot who can't spell, a spambot who can't spell or spam properly and a spambot with tenure. Tough"choice."

Image
Image
User avatar
Elaro
Padawan Learner
Posts: 493
Joined: 2006-06-03 12:34pm
Location: Reality, apparently

Post by Elaro »

Aaahaha. There actually once was a movement of "retour à la terre" (return to earth) here in Quebec. Sort of a reverse rural exodus. One of my mother's friend participated in it. Her conclusion? It was terrible.
"The surest sign that the world was not created by an omnipotent Being who loves us is that the Earth is not an infinite plane and it does not rain meat."

"Lo, how free the madman is! He can observe beyond mere reality, and cogitates untroubled by the bounds of relevance."
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

My favorite rebuttal to some "natural is always better" fruitcake is to direct them to some place like this
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by Darth Servo »

Nephtys wrote:12 artists and book-writers agree that life needs to go 'back to nature'.
They probably fall into the "starving artist" category and so simply want everyone else to be as down-and-out as they are.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

Just arrange it so that one of these idiots wind up cutting themselves on something and getting an infection. They'll change their minds pretty damn quick once they realize that without technology a good deal of people would die from something so incredibly simple to cure. (Either that or they'll be Darwin award winners due to being ridiculously stubborn. Win-win really.)
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
lazerus
The Fuzzy Doom
Posts: 3068
Joined: 2003-08-23 12:49am

Post by lazerus »

ThatGuyFromThatPlace wrote:Ever read Niven's "Fallen Angels"

I find a lot of the Green's behavior to be eerily plausible
Love that book, thought I was the only one who's read it.
3D Printed Custom Miniatures! Check it out: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pro ... miniatures
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Post by Civil War Man »

Darth Ruinus wrote:Also, I might be in the minority in this, by why is it that lots of people dont see machines and science as an extension of "Nature"?
It's mostly a holdover from religious thought (particularly Judeo-Christian). Basically, since many religions afford humanity a special place in the universe, practitioners do not consider humans a part of the natural world in the same way that a tree or a bear is. Once you have that mindset, then something built by humans, who are apart from Nature, would itself be apart from Nature due to the qualities of its creator.
User avatar
Redleader34
Jedi Knight
Posts: 998
Joined: 2005-10-03 03:30pm
Location: Flowing through the Animated Ether, finding unsusual creations
Contact:

Post by Redleader34 »

I am at a "natural" healing place. Thanks to my mother, who belives in this stuff fullheartedly. I do not like it, as it seems to say all machines give you cancer!0ne0ne!! They seem to sugest that a colon that is "fillled with toxins" are the source of all sickness. They also say that the greeks and romans (anchient) had better doets than most most modern men.
Dan's Art

Bounty on SDN's most annoying
"A spambot, a spambot who can't spell, a spambot who can't spell or spam properly and a spambot with tenure. Tough"choice."

Image
Image
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

Redleader34 wrote:I'm a Filmaker,and I also disagree with their statements.
I guess I make Artist Disagreeing With These Jackasses #3.

Gee, that wasn't hard - I'm sure we could find more if we actually started looking.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
Lusankya
ChiCom
Posts: 4163
Joined: 2002-07-13 03:04am
Location: 人间天堂
Contact:

Post by Lusankya »

Heh. This reminds me of the time my housemate and I found bottles of "Organic Water" in the supermarket. We decided not to buy them, because we didn't particularly want our water to be organic, but we could only assume that some people would think it was fantastic, because organic is always better.
"I would say that the above post is off-topic, except that I'm not sure what the topic of this thread is, and I don't think anybody else is sure either."
- Darth Wong
Free Durian - Last updated 27 Dec
"Why does it look like you are in China or something?" - havokeff
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Post by PeZook »

Redleader34 wrote:I am at a "natural" healing place. Thanks to my mother, who belives in this stuff fullheartedly. I do not like it, as it seems to say all machines give you cancer!0ne0ne!!
All machines? How about a wooden horse buggy?
Redleader34 wrote:They seem to sugest that a colon that is "fillled with toxins" are the source of all sickness.


The anti-medicine loons always have a single source of all sickness. For some it's a colon filled with toxins, for others it's "stress of modern living", for yet other it's "modern food" et al.

In my mind, any organization that provides a set of grossly simplified answers to complicated problems is a cult.
Redleader34 wrote:They also say that the greeks and romans (anchient) had better doets than most most modern men.
I guess that's why they were shorter than us.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

Redleader34 wrote:They also say that the greeks and romans (anchient) had better doets than most most modern men.
When they didn't have a shortage of food, they still had problems with many necessity items (that we have today) being a luxury for those with money. Salt was considered the realm of the wealthy, food poisoning was bound to be considerably more severe, there were limited ways to preserve food, virtually no method of chilled food. There's plenty of examples that dash apart bullshit like that.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

The American Indians were the best culture ever.
Unless we get rid of science, industry and capitalism, humanity is doomed to go extinct.
Ask them what they're gonna do when a doomsday asteroid comes at them, pray it out of existence?
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

Darth Servo wrote:My favorite rebuttal to some "natural is always better" fruitcake is to direct them to some place like this
What an idiotic thing to say that natural is always better. I remember people trying to peddle healthy cigarettes by saying they were made from all natural tobacco. And, oh what about snake venom, that's perfectly good for you, isn't it? Perfectly natural, and perfectly deadly, another poison like those plants.
User avatar
PainRack
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7581
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:03am
Location: Singapura

Post by PainRack »

Redleader34 wrote:I am at a "natural" healing place. Thanks to my mother, who belives in this stuff fullheartedly. I do not like it, as it seems to say all machines give you cancer!0ne0ne!! They seem to sugest that a colon that is "fillled with toxins" are the source of all sickness. They also say that the greeks and romans (anchient) had better doets than most most modern men.
Yikes...... Just get out of there......
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
User avatar
Akhlut
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2660
Joined: 2005-09-06 02:23pm
Location: The Burger King Bathroom

Post by Akhlut »

Redleader34 wrote:I am at a "natural" healing place. Thanks to my mother, who belives in this stuff fullheartedly. I do not like it, as it seems to say all machines give you cancer!0ne0ne!! They seem to sugest that a colon that is "fillled with toxins" are the source of all sickness. They also say that the greeks and romans (anchient) had better doets than most most modern men.
That colon idea is inherited from the 1920s, at least, according to Charles Panati, it is. Of course, if one views shit as a toxin, then, I suppose the colon is filled with toxins. However, it does grab some water, electrolytes, and some vitamins before throwing out our shit, so, it is pretty useful, all in all.


Also, I'd probably say that the ancient Greeks and Romans probably had a fairly good diet, as it'd probably be pretty similar to modern Italian and Greek dining, though, without the tomatos. To be fair, what killed them wasn't a poor diet, it was acute disease and hard living. It's not like they were like us (ubiquitous us), snarfing down a lot of fried foods and heavily processed foods (like any Hostess product). However, because of crowded living conditions and the lack of any sort of decent medicine, they did die in droves from the flu, the plague, and any number of diseases we'd consider merely inconveniencing.
SDNet: Unbelievable levels of pedantry that you can't find anywhere else on the Internet!
User avatar
Akhlut
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2660
Joined: 2005-09-06 02:23pm
Location: The Burger King Bathroom

Post by Akhlut »

PeZook wrote:
Redleader34 wrote:]They also say that the greeks and romans (anchient) had better doets than most most modern men.
I guess that's why they were shorter than us.
We do, however, have access to much more food than they did and most modern people don't use nearly as many calories on hard labor growing food. We can afford to throw more calories into increased size than they could. So, it's not necessarily an indictment on their diet, so much as on their way of life.
SDNet: Unbelievable levels of pedantry that you can't find anywhere else on the Internet!
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

It's also a consequence of less disease - illness can and does interrupt growth in children. Thanks to childhood vaccinations, most of us escape many of the illnesses that children in earlier time periods suffered (or even died from). Thus, less energy is spent on fighting off disease and repairing the damage of illness and more goes into growth. This accounts, at least in part, for why even the wealthy and powerful with access to abundant food, incuding high protein items, were still shorter on average than we are today.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
TithonusSyndrome
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2569
Joined: 2006-10-10 08:15pm
Location: The Money Store

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by TithonusSyndrome »

Nephtys wrote:Agriculture is the cause of all of this.
We should all be hunters and gatherers.
Why did you even bother watching it after they made this point? What may be the most terrifying aspect of Peak Oil is that lucrative hydrocarbon-based agriculture, the kind we've come to enjoy since the Green Revolution in the 40's and 50's, is what entitles our species to such an abundance of food. Our population, globally and nation by nation, would've never expanded to the point it's at now if we used "natural" techniques of farming and ranching. Take modern agriculture out of the picture and you take as much as 90% of our global food production away, which might be happening anyways. But to suggest that everyone on earth should voluntarily embrace a low-yield hunter-gatherer lifestyle is such a logistical obscenity that the filmmakers should count themselves lucky that they do not live in a society that doles out corporal punishment in response to abject stupidity.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by General Zod »

TithonusSyndrome wrote:
Nephtys wrote:Agriculture is the cause of all of this.
We should all be hunters and gatherers.
Why did you even bother watching it after they made this point? What may be the most terrifying aspect of Peak Oil is that lucrative hydrocarbon-based agriculture, the kind we've come to enjoy since the Green Revolution in the 40's and 50's, is what entitles our species to such an abundance of food. Our population, globally and nation by nation, would've never expanded to the point it's at now if we used "natural" techniques of farming and ranching. Take modern agriculture out of the picture and you take as much as 90% of our global food production away, which might be happening anyways. But to suggest that everyone on earth should voluntarily embrace a low-yield hunter-gatherer lifestyle is such a logistical obscenity that the filmmakers should count themselves lucky that they do not live in a society that doles out corporal punishment in response to abject stupidity.
The real irony is that the technology they're using to spread their message is the very result of the society they're decrying.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Nephtys
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6227
Joined: 2005-04-02 10:54pm
Location: South Cali... where life is cheap!

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by Nephtys »

General Zod wrote:
TithonusSyndrome wrote:
Nephtys wrote:Agriculture is the cause of all of this.
We should all be hunters and gatherers.
Why did you even bother watching it after they made this point? What may be the most terrifying aspect of Peak Oil is that lucrative hydrocarbon-based agriculture, the kind we've come to enjoy since the Green Revolution in the 40's and 50's, is what entitles our species to such an abundance of food. Our population, globally and nation by nation, would've never expanded to the point it's at now if we used "natural" techniques of farming and ranching. Take modern agriculture out of the picture and you take as much as 90% of our global food production away, which might be happening anyways. But to suggest that everyone on earth should voluntarily embrace a low-yield hunter-gatherer lifestyle is such a logistical obscenity that the filmmakers should count themselves lucky that they do not live in a society that doles out corporal punishment in response to abject stupidity.
The real irony is that the technology they're using to spread their message is the very result of the society they're decrying.
Or the fact that the filmmakers traveled around the country using trains. Nobody apparently saw the consequences of 'stopping agriculture'. I guess killing off 99.9 percent of the world's population is a great alternative to peak oil, eh? :P

Seriously, it was just insane. Sure, Fundies can be damned insane, and have a pretty worse average on how crazy they are. But I'm having a hard time thinking of one thing they can say that's worse than 'You know, stuff was way better back in 8000 BC when we had to spear food. None of this earth-depleting 'growing shit' that causes consumerism and materialism."
User avatar
TithonusSyndrome
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2569
Joined: 2006-10-10 08:15pm
Location: The Money Store

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by TithonusSyndrome »

Nephtys wrote:Seriously, it was just insane. Sure, Fundies can be damned insane, and have a pretty worse average on how crazy they are. But I'm having a hard time thinking of one thing they can say that's worse than 'You know, stuff was way better back in 8000 BC when we had to spear food. None of this earth-depleting 'growing shit' that causes consumerism and materialism."
I'm telling you people, more attention needs to be paid to new age/drug culture quackery. It's on the rise as more people lose hope in religion, and a great number of them see it as preferable to materialistic science. If a mass exodus from religion took place tomorrow, I can guarantee you that most of those fleeing religion would opt for woo-woo-isms most of the time, and unless something is done to preempt it, then most secular activism on behalf of the public understanding of science will pretty much amount to nothing.
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by Patrick Degan »

TithonusSyndrome wrote:
Nephtys wrote:Seriously, it was just insane. Sure, Fundies can be damned insane, and have a pretty worse average on how crazy they are. But I'm having a hard time thinking of one thing they can say that's worse than 'You know, stuff was way better back in 8000 BC when we had to spear food. None of this earth-depleting 'growing shit' that causes consumerism and materialism."
I'm telling you people, more attention needs to be paid to new age/drug culture quackery. It's on the rise as more people lose hope in religion, and a great number of them see it as preferable to materialistic science. If a mass exodus from religion took place tomorrow, I can guarantee you that most of those fleeing religion would opt for woo-woo-isms most of the time, and unless something is done to preempt it, then most secular activism on behalf of the public understanding of science will pretty much amount to nothing.
The difference is that new agers and druggies simply tend to withdraw from the world. Religionists, on the other hand, actually work to reshape the world into a state of impoverished conformity to their faery-tale Invisible Cloud-Being —up to and including the capture of political power to enforce that conformity through police and/or military force.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
TithonusSyndrome
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2569
Joined: 2006-10-10 08:15pm
Location: The Money Store

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by TithonusSyndrome »

Patrick Degan wrote:
TithonusSyndrome wrote:
Nephtys wrote:Seriously, it was just insane. Sure, Fundies can be damned insane, and have a pretty worse average on how crazy they are. But I'm having a hard time thinking of one thing they can say that's worse than 'You know, stuff was way better back in 8000 BC when we had to spear food. None of this earth-depleting 'growing shit' that causes consumerism and materialism."
I'm telling you people, more attention needs to be paid to new age/drug culture quackery. It's on the rise as more people lose hope in religion, and a great number of them see it as preferable to materialistic science. If a mass exodus from religion took place tomorrow, I can guarantee you that most of those fleeing religion would opt for woo-woo-isms most of the time, and unless something is done to preempt it, then most secular activism on behalf of the public understanding of science will pretty much amount to nothing.
The difference is that new agers and druggies simply tend to withdraw from the world. Religionists, on the other hand, actually work to reshape the world into a state of impoverished conformity to their faery-tale Invisible Cloud-Being —up to and including the capture of political power to enforce that conformity through police and/or military force.
I'm sure you'll agree that a culture of withdrawn slackers who think that the world owes them a living and ambition means nothing since, like, material things are fleeting carry their own perils with them.
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Why is 'Natural' better?

Post by Patrick Degan »

TithonusSyndrome wrote:
Patrick Degan wrote:
TithonusSyndrome wrote: I'm telling you people, more attention needs to be paid to new age/drug culture quackery. It's on the rise as more people lose hope in religion, and a great number of them see it as preferable to materialistic science. If a mass exodus from religion took place tomorrow, I can guarantee you that most of those fleeing religion would opt for woo-woo-isms most of the time, and unless something is done to preempt it, then most secular activism on behalf of the public understanding of science will pretty much amount to nothing.
The difference is that new agers and druggies simply tend to withdraw from the world. Religionists, on the other hand, actually work to reshape the world into a state of impoverished conformity to their faery-tale Invisible Cloud-Being —up to and including the capture of political power to enforce that conformity through police and/or military force.
I'm sure you'll agree that a culture of withdrawn slackers who think that the world owes them a living and ambition means nothing since, like, material things are fleeting carry their own perils with them.
And if there was an actual, tangible danger of such a culture displacing the present society, I might be worried about it.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
Post Reply