My Simcity 4 runs slower than it should........

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

Post Reply
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

My Simcity 4 runs slower than it should........

Post by Shrykull »

have way more than the system requirements.

I have a computer with a gig of ram, an intel celeron processor 2200Mhz, a visiontek radeon 9600 video card, and more than enough hard drive space.

I don't think there's that much difference between deluxe edition and regular SC4, even when I had regular SC4, it didn't fly through the graphics like I thought it would, neither does it with this version, even though my video card was 2 years older than when SC4 came out! Here's my video card

http://www.visiontek.com/products/cards ... 600XT.html

If anyone has the deluxe edition in which you get smooth lagless fast graphic rendering and animation, could you post your system specs here?
User avatar
Resinence
Jedi Knight
Posts: 847
Joined: 2006-05-06 08:00am
Location: Australia

Post by Resinence »

Here is what most sites say you need to have to run the game at highest detail settings:

Operating System: Windows XP Pro*
CPU Speed: Pentium 4 2.0 GHZ/AMD Athlon 2100+
RAM (memory): 256 (some lag)/512 (no lag)/1 GB (incredible)
CD/DVD Rom Speed: 8x
Video Card: 64 MB will work, 128 recommended (geforce4/newest ATI Radeon)
Sound Card: 5.1 compatible sound cards. Get that surrond sound!*2
Hard Drive Space: 1+ GB

So you really shouldn't be having too many problems with it, the only thing I can think would be that Celerons have less on-chip cache than a pentium, so you could try just "high" instead of "very high" graphics settings. I get perfect performance on my PentiumD-3GHZ/Geforce8600GTS machine, but that is way overkill if all you want to do is play simcity 4.
“Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation.” - Oscar Wilde.
User avatar
Braedley
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1716
Joined: 2005-03-22 03:28pm
Location: Ida Galaxy
Contact:

Post by Braedley »

What letters come after the 9600? Is it a GT, SE, SEC? It makes a big difference, as SE is sometimes referred to as Shit Edition. Also, there's a big difference between the Celeron and Pentiums, enough that just comparing clock speed isn't good enough. I wish Intel and AMD would start using FLOPS and MIPS when advertising their chips .
Image
My brother and sister-in-law: "Do you know where milk comes from?"
My niece: "Yeah, from the fridge!"
User avatar
FedRebel
Jedi Master
Posts: 1071
Joined: 2004-10-12 12:38am

Re: My Simcity 4 runs slower than it should........

Post by FedRebel »

Do you have any mods installed?

My SC4 runs slow when I have over a gig of buildings from simtropolis.com installed.
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Re: My Simcity 4 runs slower than it should........

Post by Shrykull »

FedRebel wrote:Do you have any mods installed?

My SC4 runs slow when I have over a gig of buildings from simtropolis.com installed.
No, I don't have any mods installed.
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

Resinence wrote:Here is what most sites say you need to have to run the game at highest detail settings:

Operating System: Windows XP Pro*
CPU Speed: Pentium 4 2.0 GHZ/AMD Athlon 2100+
RAM (memory): 256 (some lag)/512 (no lag)/1 GB (incredible)
CD/DVD Rom Speed: 8x
Video Card: 64 MB will work, 128 recommended (geforce4/newest ATI Radeon)
Sound Card: 5.1 compatible sound cards. Get that surrond sound!*2
Hard Drive Space: 1+ GB

So you really shouldn't be having too many problems with it, the only thing I can think would be that Celerons have less on-chip cache than a pentium, so you could try just "high" instead of "very high" graphics settings. I get perfect performance on my PentiumD-3GHZ/Geforce8600GTS machine, but that is way overkill if all you want to do is play simcity 4.
And are those specs you posted what your system has, or near it? How much RAM do you have? I have a gig and it runs crappy for some reason. I think I will benchmark my system as well to see if it is running like it should.
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

Braedley wrote:What letters come after the 9600? Is it a GT, SE, SEC? It makes a big difference, as SE is sometimes referred to as Shit Edition. Also, there's a big difference between the Celeron and Pentiums, enough that just comparing clock speed isn't good enough. I wish Intel and AMD would start using FLOPS and MIPS when advertising their chips .
I'm not really sure, I thought that version with the link I posted is the only one there is. I think I got rid of the box it came in, in device manager it says under
display adapters

1. Radeon 9600 Pro Family (Microsoft Corporation)
2. Radeon 9600 Pro SEC family (Microsoft Corporation)
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

It looks like you have the stock drivers installed, which are slow. Go install ATI's latest drivers and see if you get a performance boost.
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

phongn wrote:It looks like you have the stock drivers installed, which are slow. Go install ATI's latest drivers and see if you get a performance boost.
I had them installed before, before I reinstalled windows XP, it was still the same.
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

Braedley wrote:What letters come after the 9600? Is it a GT, SE, SEC? It makes a big difference, as SE is sometimes referred to as Shit Edition. Also, there's a big difference between the Celeron and Pentiums, enough that just comparing clock speed isn't good enough. I wish Intel and AMD would start using FLOPS and MIPS when advertising their chips .
But I have four times the clock speed required to run it, with that speed difference it should burn rubber, shouldn't it, even if a celeron isn't as good as a pentium 4.[/b][/i]
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Shrykull wrote:But I have four times the clock speed required to run it, with that speed difference it should burn rubber, shouldn't it, even if a celeron isn't as good as a pentium 4.[/b][/i]
No, becuase your GPU is the limiting factor. In addition, the game's AI is extremely CPU hungry - my old Athlon XP 1.5GHz (which probably outperforms your Celeron 2.2GHz) had trouble keeping up as well.
Last edited by phongn on 2007-07-29 07:36pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Braedley
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1716
Joined: 2005-03-22 03:28pm
Location: Ida Galaxy
Contact:

Post by Braedley »

I hate to tell you this, but your video card isn't as good as you would expect it to be. I should have been able to blaze through the original Halo with medium or high settings and a resolution of at least 800x600, but I would still BSOD on the lowest settings and 640x480 when I was on my 9600 SEC.
Image
My brother and sister-in-law: "Do you know where milk comes from?"
My niece: "Yeah, from the fridge!"
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

I want to build a new computer, but am waiting for PCI express 2.0 motherboards.
Post Reply