Best lightsaber wielding style

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10319
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

TC Pilot wrote:The only person I recall to have used two lightsabers at once well is the Dark Jedi Boc, and he never bothered to stand in one place for more than a second for the limited defensive options to be of much concern.
Luke did it sporadically, but consistently, most famously in the SW Comics (If they're still canon) and in "The Unifying Force" (Where it served him well enough against Warmaster Shimmrah).
In addition, Maul might count (Since his staff isn't exactly one saber...) and he did handle two jedi at once, one a famous duelling master.
It's interesting to note that one of the reasons Kyle Katarn performed so well against Jerec's Dark Jedi was because he was a trained duelist when he served in the Empire.
That helped him adjust to saber fencing well and his force powers, it's not like he gained force powers and slaughtered them with his greater skill. (Quite the opposite in fact, he usually "cheated" rather than fought a straight duel, at least during the events of JK1).
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
TC Pilot
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1648
Joined: 2007-04-28 01:46am

Post by TC Pilot »

DEATH wrote:Luke did it sporadically, but consistently, most famously in the SW Comics (If they're still canon) and in "The Unifying Force" (Where it served him well enough against Warmaster Shimmrah).
In addition, Maul might count (Since his staff isn't exactly one saber...) and he did handle two jedi at once, one a famous duelling master.
Maul does not count since he used a staff weapon instead of two swords. I am not aware of Luke using two in the comics (Marvel?), and I had forgotten about him using two in TUF. If I recall correctly, his niece and nephew were rendered speechless by his display.
"He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot."

"Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero."
User avatar
Dark Flame
Jedi Master
Posts: 1009
Joined: 2007-04-30 06:49pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by Dark Flame »

Luke also wielded two lightsabers in Vector Prime (or maybe Dark Tide, not completely sure). He only did it for a very short time, but he was very effective during his attacks.
"Have you ever been fucked in the ass? because if you have you will understand why we have that philosophy"
- Alyrium Denryle, on HAB's policy of "Too much is almost enough"

"The jacketed ones are, but we're talking carefully-placed shits here. "-out of context, by Stuart
Baal
Padawan Learner
Posts: 334
Joined: 2007-01-24 07:27pm

Post by Baal »

Dark Flame wrote:Luke also wielded two lightsabers in Vector Prime (or maybe Dark Tide, not completely sure). He only did it for a very short time, but he was very effective during his attacks.
He used two because the Vongs wank staff could parry one lightsaber but when hit by two they wouldnt hold up and would get cut.

He did this if I remember right so that he could save Jacen from the Vong.
User avatar
Dark Flame
Jedi Master
Posts: 1009
Joined: 2007-04-30 06:49pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by Dark Flame »

Baal wrote: He used two because the Vongs wank staff could parry one lightsaber but when hit by two they wouldnt hold up and would get cut.

He did this if I remember right so that he could save Jacen from the Vong.
That is correct. For that situation it turned out to be a very effective technique.
"Have you ever been fucked in the ass? because if you have you will understand why we have that philosophy"
- Alyrium Denryle, on HAB's policy of "Too much is almost enough"

"The jacketed ones are, but we're talking carefully-placed shits here. "-out of context, by Stuart
User avatar
Ryushikaze
Jedi Master
Posts: 1072
Joined: 2006-01-15 02:15am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by Ryushikaze »

As a use of the Flourentine style and various adaptations thereof (Including one where I held my sword in my right hand and a quarterstaff in my right, quite fun), I'm going to place my vote for two saber being most effective. The ability to block/ parry while simultaneously mounting an offensive or make staggered attacks and double sided feints outweigh the offset of the slightly weaker parries and time required to get used to the added weapon. I'd also assuming anyone deciding to dual wield would actually take the time to get used to dual blade movements before actually attempting to use it in combat.
Besides, it can quite easily become single saber at any time the wielder needs it.
Shannon
Padawan Learner
Posts: 198
Joined: 2006-12-12 03:43am
Location: Just North of Antarctica

Post by Shannon »

Luke's short blade is referred to as a 'shoto'. He came up with it on his own after the first time he lost to Lumiya. In the Vong War, he used two sabres of equal length on the rare occasions that he used two weapons.

My own two cents' worth: I practice kendo (single-bladed) and last year I had the opportunity to fence Washio sensei, who is a 7th Dan master of Niten Ichi-ryu (long and short sword). Now this a little seventy year old guy half my size, but his coordination is phenomenal. We fenced for a while and sure I could get inside his guard with my longer reach and if I'd wanted to I could've probably bowled him over (as I was more interested in learning how to fight against his style, I didn't do that). But when he really cut loose on me, it was a sight to behold. He was all over me like white on rice.
Now given the difference in our experience levels, that's not all that surprising anyway. But I have seen competitors at last year's World Kendo Champs in Taiwan go at it with one sword vs two, and the single-sword fighter won through superior speed and skill (though at one point his sword was actually broken in half and he had to get a replacement). These would be guys of about the same level of experience, which I think shows that to be really good at two-sword style, as good or better than someone with a single blade, you'd have to invest more time and effort to fully master and exploit the potential of two weapons. My own instructor occasionally pulls out a second sword for variety, but while he's been training since he was 8 with a single sword, he's not nearly so good with two.
As an aside, I also fenced a woman who is 5th Dan with the naginata (kind of a Japanese halberd). She too kicked my ass, making long range thrusts to my throat and cuts to my legs until I could get inside her reach and clobber her. But it was fun. :)
"An elegant weapon, for a more civilised age".
- Obi-Wan Kenobi
User avatar
Zwinmar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1107
Joined: 2005-03-24 11:55am
Location: nunyadamnbusiness

Post by Zwinmar »

It depends on the person useing the dual blades. Some just dont have inherint dexterity needed for it. But, others who are even slightly ambidexteritous can.

Ive done a little bit of rapier combat with the SCA (sic I know), but the region I was in, I easily beat their 'best' with dual rapiers. But, then again, I was 'too aggressive' by their standards as well. This does not mean much though, I have no training at all in swordmanship.

It is my opinion that some people are just naturally better at useing two blades, and some people just can not wrap their mind around it.
User avatar
Eleas
Jaina Dax
Posts: 4896
Joined: 2002-07-08 05:08am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Eleas »

It is also said that nothing is more dangerous than an amateur in battle, because you can't tell what to expect from him.
Björn Paulsen

"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

DEATH wrote: Quote/Scan? (Just to make sure ;)).
No, 'fraid not. I don't presently have the book. It was in the EGTWaT, and quoted numerous times on the internet - namely, Kun's lightsaber had intensity controls so that he could turn one blade down 'til it was simply a bar of light, and then use it as decoy to trick an opponent into committing to a parry. (Which is, in my opinion, a far better way to use a two sided lightsaber. Distracting the enemy is good, after all) Wookiepedia (ick, I know) has a comment (in an article referenced to the EGTWaT) "He also was able to independently change the length and strength of the blades, causing confusion and over/under-compensation from his opponents in combat."
Oh, you mean the bit in Labyrinth Of Evil where his armour can take starfighter shots?
Isn't it amazing how far those starfighter guns can be turned down, humm? What with Grievous's faceplate not being fully sealed, and his organ sack not being very resistant to thermal damage either, being hit with any weapon capable of dumping 'huge fireball' quantites of heat into his enviroment would be very bad for him. Let alone the multi-kiloton levels of heat some of the higher end sources suggest such craft are capable of generating. Even if his armour held perfectly, I wouldn't want my eyes to be anywhere near an enviroment with such amounts of energy being dumped into it. I dare say having super-heated plasma for air isn't good for the old sclerae... Not to mention, this is not a rebuttal. His endurance against weapons fire has nothing to do with how fast he can attack you with lightsabers, and from how many unpredictable angles. You can shoot a droideka until you're blue in the face, but that hardly means that it has any skill in lightsaber combat.
Or where he discovers an underlying algorithmic form in Vaapad after fighting Mace for a few seconds?
And? Again, this does not support the idea that Grievous can attack someone twenty times per second or more. It suggests he's good at analysing things for patterns in extremely stressful situations.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10319
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

NecronLord wrote:
DEATH wrote: Quote/Scan? (Just to make sure ;)).
No, 'fraid not. I don't presently have the book. It was in the EGTWaT, and quoted numerous times on the internet - namely, Kun's lightsaber had intensity controls so that he could turn one blade down 'til it was simply a bar of light, and then use it as decoy to trick an opponent into committing to a parry. (Which is, in my opinion, a far better way to use a two sided lightsaber. Distracting the enemy is good, after all) Wookiepedia (ick, I know) has a comment (in an article referenced to the EGTWaT) "He also was able to independently change the length and strength of the blades, causing confusion and over/under-compensation from his opponents in combat.".
Good enough for me ;). (Interesting...)
Oh, you mean the bit in Labyrinth Of Evil where his armour can take starfighter shots?
Isn't it amazing how far those starfighter guns can be turned down, humm?
Yes, and why should a strafighter turn down it's firepower to such a degree if strafing an enemy command post. It said nothing about "A shot if it were turned down to minimal power".
What with Grievous's faceplate not being fully sealed
He handled the Vacuum of space well enough.
, and his organ sack not being very resistant to thermal damage either,
Hence the armour. My organs can't even survive exposure to open air, the damn things. ;).
being hit with any weapon capable of dumping 'huge fireball' quantites of heat into his enviroment would be very bad for him.
Oh yeah. Listen I wasn't trying to argue that Grevious could saunter through Starfighter shots, merely that the speed numbers given for him are internally consistent with other sources. (They're even minimalistic in terms of his durability and strength compared to the nastier wank).
Let alone the multi-kiloton levels of heat some of the higher end sources suggest such craft are capable of generating.
Yeah, yeah. Again, no-one's suggesting that he could take a proton torpedo to the face.
Even if his armour held perfectly, I wouldn't want my eyes to be anywhere near an enviroment with such amounts of energy being dumped into it.
Such as space, a super-heated, blasted hull, a lightsaber's blade or a ship's shield with all of its delightful radiation?
I dare say having super-heated plasma for air isn't good for the old sclerae
Or the good old Heart.
... Not to mention, this is not a rebuttal. His endurance against weapons fire has nothing to do with how fast he can attack you with lightsabers, and from how many unpredictable angles.
But it does have something to do with claims that such speed is ridicolous compared to other sources, and it says something about the technology in him. (It's not an exact relationship, but if he wouldn't be any tougher than modern titanium why should we assume that he could move faster than modern robotic limbs? And Vice Versa).
Or where he discovers an underlying algorithmic form in Vaapad after fighting Mace for a few seconds?
And? Again, this does not support the idea that Grievous can attack someone twenty times per second or more. It suggests he's good at analysing things for patterns in extremely stressful situations
Close, it shows that he can process combat data at an incredible rate, and that can use it effectively as well (he adapted to the Vaapad after all, he didn't just go "Combat style learnt, must practice with Count before upgrading", he used it. If I can learn Sanskrit from an English book within minutes, why shouldn't I be able to scribble randomly within an even shorter timeframe, or why shouldn't I be able to turn the pages and read the "title" within seconds.
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

DEATH wrote:He handled the Vacuum of space well enough.
Some humanoid sci-fi species can do that just fine. Luxans and Time Lords (and the guys from The Algabraist, for a more extreme advantage) spring to mind, but I'm sure there's more. What's more, with limited internal pressure inside him, the damage from an explosive decompression should be quite limited. He was only out there briefly, after all. Not long enough for his eyes to freeze. Humans don't always explode in a vacuum, let alone cyborgs who may well have been designed to endure such conditions better than humans.
Hence the armour. My organs can't even survive exposure to open air, the damn things. ;).
Ah, but his armour wasn't sealed against the enviroment becoming super-heated. Hell, he even showed his organs off in the CW cartoon.
Oh yeah. Listen I wasn't trying to argue that Grevious could saunter through Starfighter shots,
Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure the book was. As I recall, it contained things like 'a faceplate that could survive a starfighter shot' :cry:
Yeah, yeah. Again, no-one's suggesting that he could take a proton torpedo to the face.
Proton torps are multi-megaton. Starfighter lasers are meant to be (at least, according to AotC ICS) kiloton-range. And they are suggesting he can be hit by them in the face and survive...
Such as space,
You know, explosive decompression isn't a certainty. In which case, thirty seconds exposure won't necesserily fuck you over, though it certainly isn't good for you.
a super-heated, blasted hull,
Which looked rather... not super heated in the region he was actually in.
a lightsaber's blade
Except, lightsabers don't dump significant heat (to the point that they're explicitly described as not doing so) into their enviroment until they hit something. Hence totally (well, comparatively) normal people, like Han Solo being able to turn them on without being burnt. And if someone actually hit him in the eye with a lightsaber, I rather think it would harm him.
or a ship's shield with all of its delightful radiation?
Again, would that actually harm a normal man at that distance? I am not aware of him ever, say, walking through a starship shield.
But it does have something to do with claims that such speed is ridicolous compared to other sources, and it says something about the technology in him. (It's not an exact relationship, but if he wouldn't be any tougher than modern titanium why should we assume that he could move faster than modern robotic limbs? And Vice Versa).
Robots in Star Wars rarely ever move particularly quickly. Even Magnaguards appear to be no faster than meat-and-bone humans can manage, even though they're much more coordinated. The only example of a super-speed robot that springs to mind is Guri.
Close, it shows that he can process combat data at an incredible rate, and that can use it effectively as well (he adapted to the Vaapad after all, he didn't just go "Combat style learnt, must practice with Count before upgrading", he used it. If I can learn Sanskrit from an English book within minutes, why shouldn't I be able to scribble randomly within an even shorter timeframe, or why shouldn't I be able to turn the pages and read the "title" within seconds.
False analogy. Learning the patterns of someone's movement and how to imitate it doesn't translate to being able to move super-uber fast. What you're actually saying is that, if you can learn to imitate a sword style, you should automatically be able to move your limbs at matrix-esque speed. Do you understand how quick twenty 'independant' blows per second is? That's almost one per film frame. Even the Clone Wars Grievous moves at nothing like the rate the one in the novel does. I doubt even Clone Wars Mace Windu Marvel Super Hero manages that.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10319
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

NecronLord wrote:
DEATH wrote:He handled the Vacuum of space well enough.
Some humanoid sci-fi species can do that just fine. Luxans and Time Lords (and the guys from The Algabraist, for a more extreme advantage) spring to mind, but I'm sure there's more.
Yes, but from different settings. (By Algebraist you mean the Dwellers? The ones who look like floating gas-ball tentacle things and live inside gas giants and don't look remotely humanoid ?:P).
What's more, with limited internal pressure inside him,
He had a large hollow inside his chest, as well as the constant pressure that would be required for his organs and circuitry. Sounds like the requirements for a sealed system to me. For all we know his eyes could be inside a metal hollow and linked to optic-fiber "nerves" relayed back to his pulpy brain.
the damage from an explosive decompression should be quite limited. He was only out there briefly, after all. Not long enough for his eyes to freeze.
I haven't seen the movie for a while, but wasn't he spacewalking on the (quickly) moving ship for a few minutes?
Humans don't always explode in a vacuum, let alone cyborgs who may well have been designed to endure such conditions better than humans.
That being precisely my point, and modifications could include some form of NBC protection, or at least partial sealing for his bloody Organ sack.
Hence the armour. My organs can't even survive exposure to open air, the damn things. ;).
Ah, but his armour wasn't sealed against the enviroment becoming super-heated.
How do we know that? We saw that multiple blaster bolts inside the armour took time to flammate his bloody heart, didn't scorch the back of the armour, and only burned his internal organs after the heart had exploded.
Hell, he even showed his organs off in the CW cartoon.
Er, when :? Windu crushed his heart, but we only saw the chest armour caving in.
Oh yeah. Listen I wasn't trying to argue that Grevious could saunter through Starfighter shots,
Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure the book was.
At the risk of being morally uneven, I retain the right to use examples that I would otherwise disagree with, if it serves to help me survive a debate :P.
As I recall, it contained things like 'a faceplate that could survive a starfighter shot' :cry:
'Survive' is a very vague term, after all, my body might survive an Atom bomb due to a few skeletons remaining within my charred carcass. (Again, relating to your waste heat comment, that despite disagreeing with to a degree is relevant if talking about starfighter level power. Damn, I've just included another point against myself, haven't I. :-P).
Yeah, yeah. Again, no-one's suggesting that he could take a proton torpedo to the face.
Proton torps are multi-megaton. Starfighter lasers are meant to be (at least, according to AotC ICS) kiloton-range.
A quick check at my new (:mrgreen:) Complete ICS has a Geonosian fighter with a single, powerful Laser cannon using 1x10^13 joules per shot.
Assuming a typical cannon (of which there would be the normal 2-4, as is the case with most fighters) an estimate of 1x10^12 joules per shot is a reasonable low-end, or in other words, single digit Terajoules. Less than a Kilo-ton, but still enough that small person arms would be rather ineffective. (However the fact that the word was "survived" rather than "resist" or "ignore" makes this more credible, due to the fact that Grevious didn't hold lightsabers in his bare hands/manipulators).

Could you perhaps provide the exact quote (I only have a version of the audio-book) so that we could examine its semantics as to whether it means a starfighters armaments or merely its anti-fighter "lasers"? (Or we could ignore this point, I'm terrible at this sort of "Common sense decrees that it's only the X" Quibbling).
And they are suggesting he can be hit by them in the face and survive...
That his face-plate could survive. (A bullet can hit Kevlar without penetrating, but leave a very nasty bruise). And again, it's an example of how Grevious is generally portrayed (Rather like how the Clone wars being shown as a vast conflict over-rules the "Brush fire" description ;)).
Such as space,
You know, explosive decompression isn't a certainty. In which case, thirty seconds exposure won't necesserily fuck you over, though it certainly isn't good for you.
True, but he didn't show any ill effects from his exposure, he ignored it. (And we know that he can feel pain, from the Utapau incident).
a super-heated, blasted hull,
Which looked rather... not super heated in the region he was actually in.
The hull itself had been blasted, and I'd mis-remembered that. I also think that the IH was plunging by that time, but I can't remember if it was in Coruscant's orbit by that time... Mea Culpa in that case. (Although the sheer amounts of energy being shunted around from the ships turrets could not have been a detractor to this "feat").
a lightsaber's blade
Except, lightsabers don't dump significant heat (to the point that they're explicitly described as not doing so) into their enviroment until they hit something. Hence totally (well, comparatively) normal people, like Han Solo being able to turn them on without being burnt. And if someone actually hit him in the eye with a lightsaber, I rather think it would harm him.
Sorry, brain fart on my part. Conceeded.
or a ship's shield with all of its delightful radiation?
Again, would that actually harm a normal man at that distance? I am not aware of him ever, say, walking through a starship shield.
Evacuating the IH?
But it does have something to do with claims that such speed is ridicolous compared to other sources, and it says something about the technology in him. (It's not an exact relationship, but if he wouldn't be any tougher than modern titanium why should we assume that he could move faster than modern robotic limbs? And Vice Versa).
Robots in Star Wars rarely ever move particularly quickly.
They also rarely show sentience, the sheer quantity of them and the escalating costs for certain "upgrades" makes it innefficient. (And doubtless, there would be regulations, who's want a bar-keeping droid capable of slicing your head off, even if its speed would make it economical, as opposed to cannon fodder B-1's ).
Even Magnaguards appear to be no faster than meat-and-bone humans can manage, even though they're much more coordinated.
When do we see a non force using human handle a Magna-droid in close combat? The closest we get is game mechanics, where Elite, enhanced Clone troopers within fortified positions with Blaster-turrets and terrain and superior numbers manage to take down 1-2 Magna-guards (who were not in Grevious's personal bodyguard). (SW:Clone commando)
The only example of a super-speed robot that springs to mind is Guri.
Or Grevious, or IG-88A,B,C,D,E (His descriptions have him eventually "dialing down" his processor speed so as to realize that an alarm panel is lighting up).
Close, it shows that he can process combat data at an incredible rate, and that can use it effectively as well (he adapted to the Vaapad after all, he didn't just go "Combat style learnt, must practice with Count before upgrading", he used it. If I can learn Sanskrit from an English book within minutes, why shouldn't I be able to scribble randomly within an even shorter timeframe, or why shouldn't I be able to turn the pages and read the "title" within seconds.
False analogy. Learning the patterns of someone's movement and how to imitate it doesn't translate to being able to move super-uber fast.
But it requires thinking incredibly fast, from which derives reflexes and reaction time to match.
True, it doesn't mean that he can physically move fast enough (Rather like Jedi's precognition being overwhelmed by not being able to physically move fast enough to react to two separate vectors of attack), but it does support his ability to handle the co-ordination required for multiple vecotrs and angles in his attacks.
What you're actually saying is that, if you can learn to imitate a sword style, you should automatically be able to move your limbs at matrix-esque speed.

No, that I would have to be able to think at Matrix-esque speeds in order to process and utilize that information. (In addition, the very fact that he overwhelmed jedi with his sheer speed at times requires super-human speed, since Jedi are Superhumanly fast with their own reflex "Hack").
Do you understand how quick twenty 'independant' blows per second is? That's almost one per film frame.
0.833333333 per second to be precise ;).
Even the Clone Wars Grievous moves at nothing like the rate the one in the novel does.
But he's far stronger, and dominating in his combat prowess. (Mace Windu aside). He's also more durable, what with being Blasted by a point blank Rocket to the face off a kilometers high skyscraper while running down at an absurd speed into the horizon. And he doesn't suffer a scratch from it. :P.
I doubt even Clone Wars Mace Windu Marvel Super Hero manages that.
He goes even faster when using his pateneted "Drill-hammer Kung-fu" technique, actually. ;). There's a reason why I didn't go for CW examples, the sheer power level is stupendously over-the top. (Albeit, it looked awesome).
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

Civil War Man wrote:In KOTOR, you inhibit yourself by wielding a single lightsaber (since you get less attacks, and the dueling bonuses don't really make up the difference). This is doubly true in KOTOR 2, with the addition of a large number of crystals that enhance attributes.
Although I have often seen the opposite claim (without evidence), mathematics prove KOTOR duelling feats to be superior than either a double-bladed lightsaber or dual-wielding in terms of damage over time. Because you'll hit more often on the average. I haven't bothered to check if this holds true in KOTOR II.

I typically prefer dual wielding however. Switch out the secondary for specialized use against droids, improved criticals, and so on.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
Post Reply