spaceaddict wrote:If I knew how to address each quote seperately I would. Since I don't, I will try it in a few paragraphs.
You might also try for some fucking coherency instead of running all of it together.
spaceaddict wrote:Most NFL players are role models. There are glaring exceptions. Michael Vick has become one.There are so many kids who otherwise have nothing to look forward to other than the remote possibility to become a pro athlete. They get scholarships and every once in a while make it to the pros. If the pro sports weren't there these kids would have nothing legitimate to work for . In that sense pro athletes and pro sports have a positve effect on society.
Role models in some sense, but most of your post is bullshit. Many of the pro athletes are fucking pissporr role models given their asshole behavior, flaunting of their wealth, acting as if they are above the law and generally being fuckwits. That does not send a good message. Second of all, what the fuck is stopping these kids trying to go for a skilled trade like electrician, plumber, roofer or other professional that does NOT require an absurdly expensive college education? There's money to be made in those trades and it's a far better shot than some one in ten million chance of making it to pro athlete, and you can do that until you're 70, instead of just for a few years before their bodies give out, nor does it require the kind of substance abuse, steroids etc that are pretty much mandatory if you want to go to pro sports. Pick a fucking new argument, this line is useless.
spaceaddict wrote:If pro ahletes were truely overpaid the games couldn't support themselves. Thats the nature of capitalism.
Care to explain the argument contained in this drivel, or are you just typing whatever happens to come to your mind, hoping it would make sense? They are fucking overpaid compared to their actual positive value to society based on MERIT. The nature of capitalism has NOTHING to do with the arguments arrayed against you.
spaceaddict wrote:I appologise if you make the kind of money a pro quarterback makes and know what it is like. If a doctor can fill 60,000 seats in a stadium at 60.00 to 125.00 per seat, then he/she should be paid accordingly.
So, the only criterion you use is how much money the person can make for the already filthy rich owners. Gotcha. Now, what the fuck does that have to do with anything? This question was already asked? What's the positive contribution to society compared to what a doctor, nurse, engineer or an electrician does?
spaceaddict wrote:I agree with you that Vick is most likely guilty. If he goes to jail for 12-18 months per his plea agreement, what other punishments should he have?
The ones he is getting slapped with come to mind. He's proven himself untrustworthy in addition to being a complete fucking asshole, so why put him where he could potentially abuse his position and make money doing it?
spaceaddict wrote:I believe he does have a right to pursue employment once he pays his debt.
Yeah, he's free to choose whatever job he can actually get, but it is not his RIGHT to get back where he was. Being a pro athlete is a privilege, even if he worked for it, and unethical behavior of the sort he engaged in means that privilege can be taken away from him just like that. Next argument.
spaceaddict wrote:As far as cruelty being a precursor to worse behavior, nobody has gone to jail for murder because they stuck a firecracker up a cats ass. I don't Vick should either.
Maybe he should not go to jail for murder, but he sure as hell should go there for what he did and he sure as fuck deserves all of the punishment he gets. It's costing him tens of millions of dollars all told and he can go fuck himself. He brought it on himself, there's nobody else to blame, and moronic apologists like you make me sick to my stomach. Now kindly fuck off unless you have actual arguments to bring to the table instead of this drivel.