[Alexandrov] Being a Whiny Bitch

[Alexandrov]

I know the rules. That doesn't mean I can't question them or ask why they are there.

Obviously, you can't read. Only Senators are allowed to discuss potential changes to board policy. If you don't like board policy, either ask a Senator to act on your behalf or get the fuck out and start your own forum.

Obviously, you can't. I never said I wanted to discuss potential board policy changes. This wasn't even about policy until Zod brought it up. It was merely wondering why you like flaming so much.

[Adept]

The whole notion of having tickets to inter-school sporting events just seems foreign to me, does this mean you had stands for spectators and so forth?

We did, though admittedly very small. Our outdoor bleachers were really only two three-rowed steel benches. Our indoor, gymnasium-located ones were a lot bigger. Like I said, sports at my school were a ticket to popularity, but rightfully not the only one.

[Alexandrov]

I know the rules. That doesn't mean I can't question them or ask why they are there.

Oh dear, another kiddie whose enamoured to the idea that he can engage in Style Over Substance fallacies to try and claim maturity. You're not original, son.

Any response I can formulate to this (other than what I am writing now) will result in a violent flame war that I don't wish to partake in.

[General Zod]

Obviously, you can't. I never said I wanted to discuss potential board policy changes. This wasn't even about policy until Zod brought it up. It was merely wondering why you like flaming so much.

Why don't we go over a brief timeline of what you posted, shall we?

Your first post, whining about why you were being flamed. My post, which happened after, clarifying why you were being flamed. Then you post again, attempting to clarify what you originally meant with your first post, which was to question board policy supposedly. Backpedaling combined with flat out lying! Wonderful combination there, feel free to correct me if I missed anything.

[Plekhanov]

Even in my relatively small high school we had stands for spectators. My theory on it is that parents push for this shit so they can live vicariously through their children.

British parents certainly live vicariously through their children (well some parents do anyway, I & my siblings were proxy piano players) it's just that school sports are generally not a medium they do it through. Sport sometimes but not school sport, for example a friend of mine who figure skated basically did so at the behest of her parents, no one else (aside from a few other vicarious figure skaters of course) cared though.

[Alexandrov]

Obviously, you can't. I never said I wanted to discuss potential board policy changes. This wasn't even about policy until Zod brought it up. It was merely wondering why you like flaming so much.

Why don't we go over a brief timeline of what you posted, shall we?

Your first post, whining about why you were being flamed. My post, which happened after, clarifying why you were being flamed. Then you post again, attempting to clarify what you originally meant with your first post, which was to question board policy supposedly. Backpedaling combined with flat out lying! Wonderful combination there, feel free to correct me if I missed anything.

Your whole premise is that I was whining. That isn't the case. Please correct what you said factoring in that I wasn't whining.

[Darth Servo]

The whole notion of having tickets to inter-school sporting events just seems foreign to me, does this mean you had stands for spectators and so forth?

Yes. The stands at my high school football field could hold about 1500, maybe.

[Plekhanov]

Your whole premise is that I was whining. That isn't the case. Please correct what you said factoring in that I wasn't whining.

You were whining then and you're whining now, you're a whining, whiner who whines.

[Alexandrov]

Your whole premise is that I was whining. That isn't the case. Please correct what you said factoring in that I wasn't whining.

You were whining then and you're whining now, you're a whining, whiner who whines.

Wow, I can't even respond to such stupidity.

[General Zod]

Your whole premise is that I was whining. That isn't the case. Please correct what you said factoring in that I wasn't whining.

No.

[Plekhanov]

The whole notion of having tickets to inter-school sporting events just seems foreign to me, does this mean you had stands for spectators and so forth?

Yes. The stands at my high school football field could hold about 1500, maybe.

And were they often full or even close? Did high status players get soft grades, freedom to misbehave, girls throwing themselves at them...?

If so was this in all sports or just a few, did female players get the same status or was status for them more centred around cheer leading?

[Alexandrov]

Your whole premise is that I was whining. That isn't the case. Please correct what you said factoring in that I wasn't whining.

No.

Okay, then. You can be happy knowing you "pwnz0r3d t3h n00bs" on the internet, and I'll be happy knowing that you are putting words in my mouth and twisting the facts so you can feel that way. It suits me fine.

[General Zod]

Okay, then. You can be happy knowing you "pwnz0r3d t3h n00bs" on the internet, and I'll be happy knowing that you are putting words in my mouth and twisting the facts so you can feel that way. It suits me fine.

I'd ask you to back up your claims about putting words in your mouth and "twisting the facts" ( ) but knowing how this thread is going you'll probably complain about being called a whiner some more.

[Alexandrov]

Okay, then. You can be happy knowing you "pwnz0r3d t3h n00bs" on the internet, and I'll be happy knowing that you are putting words in my mouth and twisting the facts so you can feel that way. It suits me fine.

I'd ask you to back up your claims about putting words in your mouth and "twisting the facts" ( ) but knowing how this thread is going you'll probably complain about being called a whiner some more.

Yes, I will complain about being called a whiner, because I wasn't whining. I don't understand why you think that. I asked Darth Wong a simple question about flaming, and you think I am whining about it. I hate arguing with self-infatuated arrogant people like you who are determined, even if they are wrong, to be right. It isn't complicated to admit you misinterpreted what I said, and concede that I wasn't whining. Why don't you do it?

[Darth Servo]

Yes. The stands at my high school football field could hold about 1500, maybe.

And were they often full or even close?

Usually standing room only. of course this was about 17 or 18 years ago.

Did high status players get soft grades, freedom to misbehave, girls throwing themselves at them...?

Can't say for sure but they definitely weren't taking the honors and AP classes I was taking.

As far as money goes, it was widely known that the football team got the lions share of everything. I was in the marching band in High School and our uniforms and school-owned instruments were all at least 15 or 20 years old while the football team got new uniforms every two or three years, the gym and football field got new paintjobs rather regularly, etc.

If so was this in all sports or just a few,

Mostly just football.

did female players get the same status or was status for them more centred around cheer leading?

More for cheerleaders and at least in my class, several were not the bimbos. One of the cheerleaders was also Valedictorian and I knew at least three or four others in my honors/AP classes.

[Darth Wong]

I know the rules. That doesn't mean I can't question them or ask why they are there.

Obviously, you can't read. Only Senators are allowed to discuss potential changes to board policy. If you don't like board policy, either ask a Senator to act on your behalf or get the fuck out and start your own forum.

Obviously, you can't. I never said I wanted to discuss potential board policy changes.

See the bolded section, fucktard.

This wasn't even about policy until Zod brought it up. It was merely wondering why you like flaming so much.

Because whiny kiddies such as yourself need to be flamed. Just look at how you react to it, for fuck's sake. You've now been reduced to acting as though people need to present objective evidence that you're whiny, even though "whiny" is a subjective adjective. It's pretty obvious that you're accustomed to being coddled.

When I was in first-year university, the older students made a point of reminding us frosh of just how low we sat on the totem pole. It was an important warning, and those of us who failed to heed it generally went on to fail. You've been raised under the "self-esteem" movement, and look at the result: you're so fucking whiny that you whine about being called "whiny".

[Alexandrov]

Obviously, you can't read. Only Senators are allowed to discuss potential changes to board policy. If you don't like board policy, either ask a Senator to act on your behalf or get the fuck out and start your own forum.

Obviously, you can't. I never said I wanted to discuss potential board policy changes.

See the bolded section, fucktard.

This wasn't even about policy until Zod brought it up. It was merely wondering why you like flaming so much.

Because whiny kiddies such as yourself need to be flamed. Just look at how you react to it, for fuck's sake. You've now been reduced to acting as though people need to present objective evidence that you're whiny, even though "whiny" is a subjective adjective. It's pretty obvious that you're accustomed to being coddled.

When I was in first-year university, the older students made a point of reminding us frosh of just how low we sat on the totem pole. It was an important warning, and those of us who failed to heed it generally went on to fail. You've been raised under the "self-esteem" movement, and look at the result: you're so fucking whiny that you whine about being called "whiny".

Why do you insist on interpreting a simple question wondering why you enjoy flaming so much as whining that you are doing so?

I don't need objective evidence, but I know I wasn't whining, and my original statement is obviously not whining, unless you preconceive it to be that way.

Finally, questioning was a bit nebulous, I admit. I in no way intended for that to mean discussing policy changes (although I can't make the connection, since to me it simply states question why they are there, rather than move for amendment). Sorry.

P.S. And yes, my later statements may be leaning towards the whiny side, but when otherwise intelligent people continually insist on being stupid and obstinate over something they are wrong about, it gets annoying.

[SilverWingedSeraph]

Whine whine whine, lie, whine whine whine, backpedal, whine whine whine, woe is me, you're all so cruel.

Jesus Christ, just shut the hell up already. When reading your posts, I almost hear that sobby, nasally voice of yours as you drone onnn and onnnnnnnnnn about how very cruel people are being to you.

P.S. And yes, my later statements may be leaning towards the whiny side, but when otherwise intelligent people continually insist on being stupid and obstinate over something they are wrong about, it gets annoying.

Translation: WHINE!

If it seems like I'm being excessively vindictive, it's only because you're being excessively annoying.

[Alexandrov]

Whine whine whine, lie, whine whine whine, backpedal, whine whine whine, woe is me, you're all so cruel.

Jesus Christ, just shut the hell up already. When reading your posts, I almost hear that sobby, nasally voice of yours as you drone onnn and onnnnnnnnnn about how very cruel people are being to you.

P.S. And yes, my later statements may be leaning towards the whiny side, but when otherwise intelligent people continually insist on being stupid and obstinate over something they are wrong about, it gets annoying.

Translation: WHINE!

If it seems like I'm being excessively vindictive, it's only because you're being excessively annoying.

I am only being excessively annoying because people are being excessively obdurate when they are wrong.

[Alexandrov]

And since I can't edit, and forgot this, you aren't contributing to this, so why don't you just leave. Your opinions are obviously biased off of the posts of other people, and it is blatant that you haven't actually analyzed the thread or seen what is happening.

[SilverWingedSeraph]

And since I can't edit, and forgot this, you aren't contributing to this, so why don't you just leave. Your opinions are obviously biased off of the posts of other people, and it is blatant that you haven't actually analyzed the thread or seen what is happening.

I read through every single post of this thread. Each of your posts was more mind numbingly stupid than the last. Just because I happen to agree with what everyone else is saying, that doesn't mean my opinions are biased, it just means you're wrong.

You may not have thought you were whining, but it certainly looks like whining from my perspective, and as you so conveniently pointed out, I'm not even part of this discussion. I'm an outside observer who became increasingly iritated with each of your inane posts, and felt compelled to say something about it. Maybe I should have just held my peace, and stuck with merely thinking you're annoying, instead of outright saying it.

But I didn't, and I'm certainly not going to apologise for expressing my opinion. As I said, I've read every post in this thread, and the only person whose posts I found to be more annoying and less intelligent than yours was Gigaliel.

Now, would you like to make more baseless accusations that it is "blatant that I haven't analysed the thread", or shall I leave you to it? I have very little interest in pursuing this further, otherwise.

[Einhander Sn0m4n]

so why don't you just leave

We don't leave our own forum, fucktard.

Mod: Sorry for the vulturing, but I found this display of flagrantly unwarranted gall particularly deserving of a response.

[Edi]

If it seems like I'm being excessively vindictive, it's only because you're being excessively annoying.

I am only being excessively annoying because people are being excessively obdurate when they are wrong.

If I wasn't at work right now, I'd excessively horsemanize your post, you patronizing little cunt-dribble. You've been nothing but complaining how people are somehow taking your posts wrong, but here's a newsflash for you, fuckwit: If people consistently get a completely different impression of your words than what you intend, the problem is NOT with them, it's with YOU. Clarity of expression is very important when you want to get something across and there is absolutely no patience at all here for the kind of semantics whoring, weaselly bullshit you've been throwing around. Most of the people who are ridiculing you and legitimately pointing out how you're being a smart-alecky crybaby have been around these forums for years and they do not consistently misinterpret people's posts to the kind of degree you are claiming here.

In other words, you're lying, you're trolling and you're well on your way to getting yourself your very own ban poll in the Senate, assuming anyone will have time to set one up before you get summarily hit with the Ban Hammer.

Now grow the fuck up, shut the fuck up, fuck off and stop polluting my forum with your semantics whoring garbage.

[Edi]

And since I can't edit, and forgot this, you aren't contributing to this, so why don't you just leave. Your opinions are obviously biased off of the posts of other people, and it is blatant that you haven't actually analyzed the thread or seen what is happening.

Editing is disabled precisely to prevent little dipshits like you from going back and altering their posts to erase evidence of what they actually said. It's also obvious that you have no fucking idea of what you're talking about.

[Edi]

so why don't you just leave

We don't leave our own forum, fucktard.

Mod: Sorry for the vulturing, but I found this display of flagrantly unwarranted gall particularly deserving of a response.

You're actually not doing any backseat modding here, but best be careful after that previous flap. Your response to the current chewtoy is entirely appropriate, though.

I suspect he is going to be made to leave very soon.