I am glad my Oakland pick panned out. My coworkers all thought I was nuts for picking the Raiders to win against anyone

Tomorrow I need to look at my season schedule and the injury reports and figure out who looks good for this week.
Moderator: Edi
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
Actually the problem is you have Lewis, Suggs, Reed, and Rolle...that's it. Baltimore has been good in the past because they constantly shifted the front line formation, came from different angels and attacked with speed not power. Now with Lewis continuing to age, Reed losing a half step and Thomas out the door Suggs is the ONLY fast attack option the defense has. For a system built to confuse and then overwhelm with speed that is a disaster in the making. Sure its a system that any fast and ball-seeking player will be able to perform beyond their means but right now they don't have enough youth and speed to do what the defense is designed for.Falkenhayn wrote:What in the blue hell happend to Baltimore's defense? Are they missing Adalius Thomas that much? I mean, you've still got Ray Ray, Terrel Suggs, Samari Rolle and the like...
He started bitching and whining at Carson Palmer. Bad move, because unlike most of the other QBs in the league these days, Palmer won't put up with that kind of thing for long and didn't: he told Johnson to shut the fuck up. Johnson later apologized when not only the Bengals coaches, but his old coach in junior college who called him up and told him the same thing. He fucked up on the pattern that led to the pick.Darth Fanboy wrote:Apparently Chad Johnson went off during the game at one or more of his teammates? Anyone who watched the game able to confirm this for me?
Man Cincy is a fucking wreck. Trade Ocho Cinco to Dallas and put him on a team with T.O. and watch the fireworks. Yikes....
Marvin Lewis wrote:"If you don't want to be on this team, please don't show up!" Lewis said, yelling so loud that reporters outside could hear. "You don't call the offense, you don't call the plays. You just play.
Palmer said in his post game or day after interview that it was him that "lost his cool" not Chad, and that Johnson was just responding to CP yelling at him.Elfdart wrote:He started bitching and whining at Carson Palmer. Bad move, because unlike most of the other QBs in the league these days, Palmer won't put up with that kind of thing for long and didn't: he told Johnson to shut the fuck up. Johnson later apologized when not only the Bengals coaches, but his old coach in junior college who called him up and told him the same thing. He fucked up on the pattern that led to the pick.Darth Fanboy wrote:Apparently Chad Johnson went off during the game at one or more of his teammates? Anyone who watched the game able to confirm this for me?
Man Cincy is a fucking wreck. Trade Ocho Cinco to Dallas and put him on a team with T.O. and watch the fireworks. Yikes....
On top of that, Marvin Lewis (about as mild mannered a coach as you'll see) was overheard yelling at his players:
Marvin Lewis wrote:"If you don't want to be on this team, please don't show up!" Lewis said, yelling so loud that reporters outside could hear. "You don't call the offense, you don't call the plays. You just play.
seriously?? How many five touchdown games does it take to pick an undefeated team over a .500 team? If i had a time machine I'd love to see what this Pats team could do to the '86 bears or the '72 Dolphins or one of Joe Montana's prime time 49'ers teams.Qwerty 42 wrote:Since I don't know if I'll be on before kickoff, I'll make my picks now.
Cleveland at New England- tie
I'm picking solely based on which teams I like more. My logic here is that the jerkishness of New England coaching and Cleveland fans will offset each other.Col. Crackpot wrote:seriously?? How many five touchdown games does it take to pick an undefeated team over a .500 team? If i had a time machine I'd love to see what this Pats team could do to the '86 bears or the '72 Dolphins or one of Joe Montana's prime time 49'ers teams.Qwerty 42 wrote:Since I don't know if I'll be on before kickoff, I'll make my picks now.
Cleveland at New England- tie
Well I like Wile E. Coyote better than the laws of physics. My logic here is the thickness of your head will offset gravity. So i pick you over the rock chasm. Now jump!Qwerty 42 wrote:I'm picking solely based on which teams I like more. My logic here is that the jerkishness of New England coaching and Cleveland fans will offset each other.Col. Crackpot wrote:seriously?? How many five touchdown games does it take to pick an undefeated team over a .500 team? If i had a time machine I'd love to see what this Pats team could do to the '86 bears or the '72 Dolphins or one of Joe Montana's prime time 49'ers teams.Qwerty 42 wrote:Since I don't know if I'll be on before kickoff, I'll make my picks now.
Cleveland at New England- tie
I've been doing this all season. Ironically, so far it's been working, I have a winning record through week four. It's not my list of "who's going to win" so much as "who I'm rooting for."Col. Crackpot wrote:Well I like Wile E. Coyote better than the laws of physics. My logic here is the thickness of your head will offset gravity. So i pick you over the rock chasm. Now jump!Qwerty 42 wrote:I'm picking solely based on which teams I like more. My logic here is that the jerkishness of New England coaching and Cleveland fans will offset each other.Col. Crackpot wrote: seriously?? How many five touchdown games does it take to pick an undefeated team over a .500 team? If i had a time machine I'd love to see what this Pats team could do to the '86 bears or the '72 Dolphins or one of Joe Montana's prime time 49'ers teams.
I agree completely, especially with your bit about Carolina. Last season, they covered the point spread ONCE. I made SO MUCH money just by betting against them every time. It's great. If DeAngelo Hall hadn't played like a retard and handed them two TD's, it would be working this year, too. As it is, that's my one loss, and even that was looking good until Hall lost his temper.havokeff wrote:If the Pack win, they will make the playoffs and the Bears will be done.
This is an absolute must win for the Chargers. If Denver gets this win, SD won't be able to catch them and with the strength of the AFC they will be hard pressed to get a Wild Card berth. That being said, I REALLY want to pick SD, but I just keep seeing Bailey and Bly returning Ints for TDs in my mind.
I can't believe that the "experts" have picked Carolina to be the cream of the NFC crop two years in a row now. That organization must have one hell of a PR machine, 'cause they don't have much of a team.
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
Jeez. Something is seriously wrong with that team.Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Fucking Saints.