General Zod wrote:He's been bouncing between those two the whole thread anyway. It's not like we can expect much in terms of consistency.
Maybe he'll tell us it's illegal to flame him...you know...for our own protection...
Its kind of like a criminal idea summed up as "Protection Racket", we leave you alone so long as you abandon legal protection and the US constitution. Instead of a good fella quietly passing on a message from a mob boss we have a an officer in uniform passing on a message from 'concerned citizens', do things our way or else.
So, DftS, is that what you are doing? running a virtual protection racket? forcing you own beliefs of how society should be under colour of law?
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"
No, he's not doing that. He's only bragging about being nothing more than a vigilante with a badge.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
Patrick Degan wrote:No, he's not doing that. He's only bragging about being nothing more than a vigilante with a badge.
Thats how he is acting, but what is the intent and what is the effect?.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"
Stark wrote:So in the US if someone's freedoms might cause problems due to neaderthal attitudes not supported by law, you sacrifice the freedom rather than punish the neanderthal?
Is it worth pointing out at this point that the neanderthals are likely white Americans and the freedoms being lost are those of illegal immigrants, probably illegal Mexican immigrants? And he honestly thinks he's doing a good job!
fixed it for ya.
FUCK YOU, you likely inbred southern redneck piece of shit. My great grandfather legally emigrated to the U.S., got black lung disease digging coal out of shitass mines in Utah for the WW2 war effort and never complained once about getting a raw deal here, so I could listen to some racist piece of shit like you say anyone with Mexican heritage or appearance is automatically an illegal immigrant? Should I be afraid for my protections as a third-generation, native-born, English-speaking, American citizen because you might think I look a little too wetback for you? FUCK YOU.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | LibertarianSocialist |
Patrick Degan wrote:No, he's not doing that. He's only bragging about being nothing more than a vigilante with a badge.
Thats how he is acting, but what is the intent and what is the effect?.
The effect would be enforcing his personal political views on people under threat. The intent is quite frankly immaterial.
Well, the intent is to force his personal political views on others by acting as a vigilante, under colour of law and, seemingly, to protect his victims from supposed retribution from others.
Its nothing but a form of unpaid protection racket.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"
Stark wrote:So in the US if someone's freedoms might cause problems due to neaderthal attitudes not supported by law, you sacrifice the freedom rather than punish the neanderthal?
Is it worth pointing out at this point that the neanderthals are likely white Americans and the freedoms being lost are those of illegal immigrants, probably illegal Mexican immigrants? And he honestly thinks he's doing a good job!
fixed it for ya.
FUCK YOU, you likely inbred southern redneck piece of shit. My great grandfather legally emigrated to the U.S., got black lung disease digging coal out of shitass mines in Utah for the WW2 war effort and never complained once about getting a raw deal here, so I could listen to some racist piece of shit like you say anyone with Mexican heritage or appearance is automatically an illegal immigrant? Should I be afraid for my protections as a third-generation, native-born, English-speaking, American citizen because you might think I look a little too wetback for you? FUCK YOU.
Why are you telling him to fuck off when your grandfather was a legal immigrant, and he's talking about illegal immigrants? I'm only curious?
Anyway, I can't believe the direction this thread has taken. I guess I was a bit naive hoping that he'd read this thread, and realize he was making a mistake. Frankly, it pisses me off because police have a hard enough time without morons purposely ruining our reputation.
DftS, ask yourself this. If your story was aired on the news what do you think the fallout would be like?
Death from the Sea, does any of the following sound familiar?
Oath of Honor
On my honor, I will never betray my badge, my integrity, my character, or the public trust. I will always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for their actions. I will always uphold the Constitution and the community I serve.
Law Enforcement Code of Ethics
As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice.
I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty.
I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities.
I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives.
Original Warsie ++ Smartass! ~ Picker ~ Grinner ~ Lover ~ Sinner ++ "There's no time for later now"
Kamakazie Sith wrote:Why are you telling him to fuck off when your grandfather was a legal immigrant, and he's talking about illegal immigrants? I'm only curious?
I'm guessing it's because DSTS is assuming these people are illegal immigrants, probably based on their appearance.
Anyway, I can't believe the direction this thread has taken. I guess I was a bit naive hoping that he'd read this thread, and realize he was making a mistake. Frankly, it pisses me off because police have a hard enough time without morons purposely ruining our reputation.
DftS, ask yourself this. If your story was aired on the news what do you think the fallout would be like?
In a small town in Texas? He'd probably get applauded. That's precisely the problem; it is mob rule and he is either sympathetic to the mob or so unprincipled that he would never oppose it.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
the deduction that (some of) these people are here illegally comes from the way the act, what language they speak to me, their body language, their reaction to me in general. The way they dress or look physically is not a good indicator of an illegal. So maybe a fuck you to the people here calling me a racist or assuming that anyway is in order here. BUT that part of the thread is going in a different direction there so...
back on topic I can say that now that I do know about the flag code, I will just advise people of that instead of saying anything about any other federal law. And as before, if they fix it they fix it. If not, then like before I will go on about my business.
"War.... it's faaaaaantastic!" <--- Hot Shots:Part Duex "Psychos don't explode when sunlight hits them, I don't care how fucking crazy they are!"~ Seth from Dusk Till Dawn
|BotM|Justice League's Lethal Protector
Death from the Sea wrote:the deduction that (some of) these people are here illegally comes from the way the act, what language they speak to me, their body language, their reaction to me in general. The way they dress or look physically is not a good indicator of an illegal. So maybe a fuck you to the people here calling me a racist or assuming that anyway is in order here. BUT that part of the thread is going in a different direction there so...
Yet surprisingly we're not the ones bragging about abusing our authority to enforce laws that only exist in our head.
back on topic I can say that now that I do know about the flag code, I will just advise people of that instead of saying anything about any other federal law. And as before, if they fix it they fix it. If not, then like before I will go on about my business.
Care to tell us about any other laws you "enforce" that you're not sure about? You know, just so we know what to avoid if we ever happen to have the misfortune of being in Texas.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Death from the Sea wrote:back on topic I can say that now that I do know about the flag code, I will just advise people of that instead of saying anything about any other federal law. And as before, if they fix it they fix it. If not, then like before I will go on about my business.
Oh really:
I see this often around my city and I take corrective action in the form of making the business owner fix it. I don't know the specific law but I always BS them with the old "it is a Federal Law, so breaking that is an automatic felony" and they fix it so fast your head spins.
That's not you "advising them about the flag code", that's you saying they're in breach of the law and implying they're subject to arrest and prosecution if they don't take down the Mexican flag.
Your words, in the OP.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
This outrageously stupid attitude is even more ridiculous when he's a walking, talking example of INSTITUTIONALISED RACISM in the police department. Shit, I fucking wonder why they don't like you when THEY'RE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST by you and people like you? Clearly, fearing abuse by known-abusive policemen = you are a criminal.
Frankly, Kamakaze's bizarre question shocks me. How do you THINK he 'knows' they're illegal immigrants? Does he check their illegal immigrant papers?
Death from the Sea wrote:back on topic I can say that now that I do know about the flag code, I will just advise people of that instead of saying anything about any other federal law. And as before, if they fix it they fix it. If not, then like before I will go on about my business.
Oh really:
I see this often around my city and I take corrective action in the form of making the business owner fix it. I don't know the specific law but I always BS them with the old "it is a Federal Law, so breaking that is an automatic felony" and they fix it so fast your head spins.
That's not you "advising them about the flag code", that's you saying they're in breach of the law and implying they're subject to arrest and prosecution if they don't take down the Mexican flag.
Your words, in the OP.
um, yes but that was me saying that in th future, not trying to say that is what I have done in the past. I am saying that I am no longer going to toss out the BS line since I now KNOW it is not against the law like I originally believed. So try to think before you misread my post to jump on me.
"War.... it's faaaaaantastic!" <--- Hot Shots:Part Duex "Psychos don't explode when sunlight hits them, I don't care how fucking crazy they are!"~ Seth from Dusk Till Dawn
|BotM|Justice League's Lethal Protector
Stark wrote:People who don't like cops are clearly criminals!
I am not seeing where that came from but ok...
How do you THINK he 'knows' they're illegal immigrants?
aside from what I said before, most will actually admit it.
"War.... it's faaaaaantastic!" <--- Hot Shots:Part Duex "Psychos don't explode when sunlight hits them, I don't care how fucking crazy they are!"~ Seth from Dusk Till Dawn
|BotM|Justice League's Lethal Protector
USFlag.org wrote:This code is the guide for all handling and display of the Stars and Stripes. It does not impose penalties for misuse of the United States Flag. That is left to the states and to the federal government for the District of Columbia. Each state has its own flag law.
Criminal penalties for certain acts of desecration to the flag were contained in Title 18 of the United States Code prior to 1989. The Supreme Court decision in Texas v. Johnson; June 21, 1989, held the statute unconstitutional. This statute was amended when the Flag Protection Act of 1989 (Oct. 28, 1989) imposed a fine and/or up to I year in prison for knowingly mutilating, defacing, physically defiling, maintaining on the floor or trampling upon any flag of the United States. The Flag Protection Act of 1989 was struck down by the Supreme Court decision, United States vs. Eichman, decided on June 11, 1990.
Your head is humming and it won't go, in case you don't know, the piper's calling you to join him
Death from the Sea wrote:um, yes but that was me saying that in th future, not trying to say that is what I have done in the past. I am saying that I am no longer going to toss out the BS line since I now KNOW it is not against the law like I originally believed. So try to think before you misread my post to jump on me.
You're missing the point douchebag. It's your job to actually know whether or not something is a law before you attempt to enforce it. Not pull shit out of your ass when it suits you. I guess professionalism isn't very high on the list of priorities for Texas police.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Can't we be rid of nationalism and the symbols associated with it? The modern nation-state sprung into existence with the Treaty of Westphalia, and will no doubt go the way of the dinosaur when it has served its purpose. There were ages before it existed, and there will be long ages after it has run its course. Nationalism was once a radical ideology of revolt against monarchy; now it has become stifling and unproductive. Let others find something over which to be clannish, but the twin ideologies of nationalism and national-patriotism have become harmful and obsolete.
ArcturusMengsk wrote:Can't we be rid of nationalism and the symbols associated with it? The modern nation-state sprung into existence with the Treaty of Westphalia, and will no doubt go the way of the dinosaur when it has served its purpose. There were ages before it existed, and there will be long ages after it has run its course. Nationalism was once a radical ideology of revolt against monarchy; now it has become stifling and unproductive. Let others find something over which to be clannish, but the twin ideologies of nationalism and national-patriotism have become harmful and obsolete.
Sure, what do you propose?
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong
But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
ArcturusMengsk wrote:Can't we be rid of nationalism and the symbols associated with it? The modern nation-state sprung into existence with the Treaty of Westphalia, and will no doubt go the way of the dinosaur when it has served its purpose. There were ages before it existed, and there will be long ages after it has run its course. Nationalism was once a radical ideology of revolt against monarchy; now it has become stifling and unproductive. Let others find something over which to be clannish, but the twin ideologies of nationalism and national-patriotism have become harmful and obsolete.
Sure, what do you propose?
Nothing thus far, though it is a problem I intend to tackle. It's quite absurd to assert that the nation-state is the definitive or most highly developed method of social arrangement, particularly when it is territorially - rather than productivity - based. Clearly delineated territories will become less relevant as the global population increases, and I strongly suspect that some form of production-centered method of arrangement will take its place in the coming centuries.
The nation-state is slowly being supplanted by the international forces of business already. As flawed as the nationalist model is, I can't see this as an improvement. At least the nationalist model has some semblance of interest in the welfare of its denizens, whereas the multi-national business model has none.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
Darth Wong wrote:The nation-state is slowly being supplanted by the international forces of business already. As flawed as the nationalist model is, I can't see this as an improvement. At least the nationalist model has some semblance of interest in the welfare of its denizens, whereas the multi-national business model has none.
It needn't necessarily be that bad, however. I'm quite a fan of syndicalism; with any luck the 'state' will be the union, quite literally.
Stark wrote:
Frankly, Kamakaze's bizarre question shocks me. How do you THINK he 'knows' they're illegal immigrants? Does he check their illegal immigrant papers?
Something like that. Did you think we just randomly choose people for deportation, or that we have a way of checking? Hint - There is a process that we can use to check. Though in my state we leave that up mostly up to INS because frankly we have better things to do than going around harassing people who just want a better life.