The backstory of Star Wars, according to Lucas in 1977

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Galvatron
Decepticon Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:27am
Location: Kill! Smash! Destroy! Rend! Mangle! Distort!

The backstory of Star Wars, according to Lucas in 1977

Post by Galvatron »

The following is quoted from a never-before-published private interview of George Lucas by Lucasfilm's Carol Titleman back in 1977 as printed in the recent book The Making of Star Wars by J.W.Rinzler.
“In the Old Republic, all the systems sent their representatives to the Senate. It wasn’t an Imperial Senate; it was a Republican Senate, which made the decisions that controlled the Republic. There were 24,372 systems in the Galactic Senate. The Senate would vote in a Chancellor or an overseer who would work for four years as the leader of the executive branch of the Republic. You were only supposed to be able to run for one four-year term—you were only eligible for one term.

What happened was one of the Chancellors began subverting the Senate and buying off the Senators with the help of some of the large intergalactic trade companies and mining companies. Through their power and money, he bought off enough of the senate to get himself elected to a second term, because of a crisis. By the time the third term came along, he had corrupted so much of the Senate that they made him Emperor for the rest of his life.

Giving the Emperor that title for life and doing away with the elective process was all done with a lot of rationalizing. Many in the Senate felt that having elections and changing leaders in the time of an emergency disrupted the bureaucratic system. And the bureaucracy was getting to be so big that changing leaders made it impossible to have any effect on the system and make it work—moreover, the bureaucracy was running amok and not paying attention to the rulers. So they reasoned that the Emperor could bring the bureaucracy back into line. So the Emperor took control of the bureaucracy. The Galactic Senate would meet for a period that was similar to a year, but after it became the Imperial Senate, the meetings were less and less frequent until finally the meetings were only once a year, and they were very short.

With the bureaucracy behind the Emperor, it was impossible and too late for the Senate to do anything. He had slowly manipulated things; in fact, it was he who let the bureaucracy run amok and therefore had blackmailed the Senate into doing things because he was the only one who really had any power over the bureaucracy. It was so large there was no way to get things done, but he knew the right people; the key people in the bureaucracy were working for him and were paid by the companies.

When he became Emperor, a little over half the Senate as it turned out was not involved, was not corrupted—and they reacted strongly against the whole thing. There was a rebellion in terms of the Senate against the Emperor; they tried to oust him legally and have him impeached. But many of the Senators who were fighting the Emperor at that time mysteriously died. The Jedi Knights were alerted immediately and they rallied to the Senate’s side. But there was a plot afoot and when the Jedi finally rallied and tried to restore order, they were betrayed and eventually killed by Darth Vader.”

“When the Jedi tried to restore order, Darth Vader was still one of the Jedi. What he would do is catch the Jedi off-guard and, using his knowledge of the Force, he would kill the Jedi without them realizing what was happening. They trusted him and they didn't realize he was the murderer who was decimating their ranks. At the height of the Jedi, there were several hundred thousand. At the time of the Rebellion, most of them were killed. The Emperor had some strong forces rally behind him, as well, in terms of the army and the Imperial forces that he'd been building up secretly. The Jedi were so outnumbered that they fled and were tracked down. They tried to regroup, but they were eventually massacred by one of the special elite forces led by Darth Vader. Eventually, only a few, including Ben and Luke's father, were left. Luke's father is named Annikin.”
Thanks to Michael Kaminski, author of the The Secret History of Star Wars, for making this available on his web site.

So this is pretty much the smoking gun that proves that Vader and "Annikin" were originally two separate people.
Last edited by Galvatron on 2007-10-21 03:46am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

"The Smoking Gun"? I've noticed your rather anti-Lucas statements in the past (if this is somehow connected to that), but isn't this a well-known fact from the production of ANH, and he even went on record, or someone did, that Lucas wasn't sure whether to make Vader Luke's father during the production of ESB? What is the news here, exactly?
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Axe-grinding; its been obvious that originally Anakin and Vader were different people.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: The backstory of Star Wars, according to Lucas in 1977

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Galvatron wrote:So this is pretty much the smoking gun that proves that Vader and "Annikin" were originally two separate people.
Ok... Do you have a point? Or is this just another one of those penetrating forays into the painfully obvious?
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: The backstory of Star Wars, according to Lucas in 1977

Post by Terralthra »

Galvatron wrote:So this is pretty much the smoking gun that proves that Vader and "Annikin" were originally two separate people.
OMFG! George Lucas retconned something in Star Wars continuity? No way! :roll:
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

Hey, there are seriously people who think Star Wars didn't go through a writing evolution as the movies were made, and that Lucas had the current state of SW in mind when he started ANH.

No, really, these people exist.
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

So what? In one of the early drafts of SW, Han Solo was far older than Luke and Leia (old enough to be their father in fact). Scripts change after the first draft all the time.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

Darth Servo wrote:So what? In one of the early drafts of SW, Han Solo was far older than Luke and Leia (old enough to be their father in fact). Scripts change after the first draft all the time.
Uh, no shit. That's why these people are irritating?
User avatar
Galvatron
Decepticon Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:27am
Location: Kill! Smash! Destroy! Rend! Mangle! Distort!

Post by Galvatron »

Stark wrote:Hey, there are seriously people who think Star Wars didn't go through a writing evolution as the movies were made, and that Lucas had the current state of SW in mind when he started ANH.

No, really, these people exist.
Exactly. So the eye-rollers can basically go fuck themselves.
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Post by Terralthra »

The eye-rollers were pointing out that the 'proof' you quoted was utterly superfluous. The only people who think that will just say that that interview doesn't explicitly say anything about Anakin not being a Sith. You can't convince the wilfully deluded.
User avatar
Publius
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1912
Joined: 2002-07-03 08:22pm
Location: Novus Ordo Sæculorum
Contact:

Post by Publius »

It is interesting that in the original scenario Palpatine was supposedly at the head of a minority government.
God's in His Heaven, all's right with the world
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Stark wrote:Hey, there are seriously people who think Star Wars didn't go through a writing evolution as the movies were made, and that Lucas had the current state of SW in mind when he started ANH.

No, really, these people exist.
:shock:

Bwahahahaha!

Maybe its just because I'm tired, but that's hilarious... :lol:

Well whatever. I'm not about to go "fuck myself" by your request, Galvatron, but I see you had a reason for making the point, at least.
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
DPDarkPrimus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 18399
Joined: 2002-11-22 11:02pm
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Post by DPDarkPrimus »

Publius wrote:It is interesting that in the original scenario Palpatine was supposedly at the head of a minority government.
In the original novelization of Star Wars, it even makes out the Emperor to be a figurehead, with the real power being in corrupt senators and moffs.
Mayabird is my girlfriend
Justice League:BotM:MM:SDnet City Watch:Cybertron's Finest
"Well then, science is bullshit. "
-revprez, with yet another brilliant rebuttal.
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Post by Civil War Man »

Darth Servo wrote:So what? In one of the early drafts of SW, Han Solo was far older than Luke and Leia (old enough to be their father in fact). Scripts change after the first draft all the time.
Not only that, but from what I've heard, Darth Vader's signature costume was going to be a vacuum suit that he just uses to cross over into Tantive IV. They made the suit a permanent fixture after they saw how awesome Vader's entrance turned out to be (I believe they planned it something like "Should we have some trooper announce his arrival?" "Nah, just have him walk in without saying anything and play some scary music to show he's a bad guy.")
User avatar
Anguirus
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3702
Joined: 2005-09-11 02:36pm
Contact:

Post by Anguirus »

Wait a sec.

While I have no doubt that Vader and Anakin were originally separate characters, this doesn't prove a thing.

Because if Lucas knew in 1977 that he was going to pull "Vader is Luke's father" out of his hat, the last thing he would do is tell someone. Even in a "private" interview.

I mean, he told Bantha Tracks in 1978 that Vader, Anakin, and Obi-Wan all fought a duel near a lava pit, and no one thinks that's a "smoking gun." Whether or not Lucas had combined the characters yet, the official story would still be that they are separate!
"I spit on metaphysics, sir."

"I pity the woman you marry." -Liberty

This is the guy they want to use to win over "young people?" Are they completely daft? I'd rather vote for a pile of shit than a Jesus freak social regressive.
Here's hoping that his political career goes down in flames and, hopefully, a hilarious gay sex scandal.
-Tanasinn
You can't expect sodomy to ruin every conservative politician in this country. -Battlehymn Republic
My blog, please check out and comment! http://decepticylon.blogspot.com
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Post by Bounty »

While I have no doubt that Vader and Anakin were originally separate characters, this doesn't prove a thing.
Unless you honestly believe that Lucas had the whole thing planned out and was deliberately spreading misinformation, "yes it does".
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

So why isn't Jar Jar's instrumental role in the formation of the Empire mentioned?








I'm joking of course! :)


Seriously, thanks for posting this, especially for those of us who haven't bought a copy of TMOSW. We've got to keep sticking it to those "always intended" fanboys!
fun/fantasy movies existed before the overrated Star Wars came out. What made it seem 'less dark' was the sheer goofy aspect of it: two robots modeled on Laurel & Hardy, and a smartass outlaw with bigfoot co-pilot and their hotrod pizza-shaped ship, and they were sucked aboard a giant Disco Ball. -adw1
Someone asked me yesterday if Dracula met Saruman and there was a fight, who would win. I just looked at this man. What an idiotic thing to say. I mean really, it was half-witted. - Christopher Lee

Image
JKA Server 2024
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

While I don't think Lucas had planned that particular theme from the start, I do think it's possible that he toyed with the idea that Vader was Luke's father and that the idea definitly took root after Star Wars became such a success. Lucas got the story together, if he did it from the start (the way he likes to think) or came up with it later, it really doesn't matter. So what? And to make such a fuss about it and to tell people to go "fuck themselves" is juvenile.
User avatar
Galvatron
Decepticon Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:27am
Location: Kill! Smash! Destroy! Rend! Mangle! Distort!

Post by Galvatron »

So you haven't read all the recent quotes by Lucas claming that the story was originally meant to be The Tragedy of Darth Vader?

I suggest reading The Secret History of Star Wars. Specifically, pages 354-354.
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

Galvatron wrote:So you haven't read all the recent quotes by Lucas claming that the story was originally meant to be The Tragedy of Darth Vader?

I suggest reading The Secret History of Star Wars. Specifically, pages 354-354.
Yes, I have (and I have read the book you're linking to, it has been discussed here earlier) and while that surely is exaggerated, let's face it, all screenplays and stories evolves. The most likely is that George Lucas changed his mind along the way and retconned Vader to be Luke's father, but on the other hand we don't have access to Lucas's binder (and there's also the elusive quote from the 70's which I've been trying to track down that Star Wars is about "a father, son and twins") and quite frankly, I don't think that it's so much of a deal. Star Wars is George Lucas's creation if he wants to think that it was planned from the start, then it's his prerogative.
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Post by Dooey Jo »

Galvatron wrote:So you haven't read all the recent quotes by Lucas claming that the story was originally meant to be The Tragedy of Darth Vader?
It can't be a tragedy unless Vader and Anakin are the same persons?
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

It's interesting to see what does stick. The prologue of the novel, IIRC, even mentions the Emperor using 'Great Organs of Trade' to rise to power.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

my 2 cents (again)

Post by Kurgan »

Dooey Jo wrote:
Galvatron wrote:So you haven't read all the recent quotes by Lucas claming that the story was originally meant to be The Tragedy of Darth Vader?
It can't be a tragedy unless Vader and Anakin are the same persons?
Since only part of the story focuses on Anakin (it really begins with ESB) and of that only part of it treating him as a sympathetic figure (ROTJ), and since the prequels were largely written a decade and a half later and used the recast version of Anakin's character from the early 80's, I'd say it really hasn't been "the tragedy of Darth Vader." That's an appropriate title for the Prequels (or at least II & III), but certainly not for the "saga as a whole" as "originally intended." When you think about it, Anakin's redemption in ROTJ is really more of a subplot... a way of tying up loose ends, than the focus of the OT (which was really about Luke becoming a Jedi and the Rebellion defeating the Empire).

The original concept was "the Adventures of Luke Skywalker" and the buzz was that the PT was going to be "the Adventures of Obi-Wan Kenobi" (especially given his ascendancy in TPM). That of course was forgotten once Episode II was coming out, iirc.


I think the issue at hand is that Lucas makes several claims today about what he intended for the story, and these are believed by a significant number of fans (at least if my own random wanderings through the internet are typical) and that differs from the evidence at hand (old interviews, old scripts, accounts by others connected to Star Wars, etc). Much as I'd like to give Lucas the benefit of the doubt, I think his own words contradict him. It's not a problem that he evolved the story, it's only a problem when he basically acts like it didn't evolve. That's just insulting to anyone who's done any research. If he wants to "clear up the confusion" he should produce these "secret notebooks" that explain his side of the story. It's not as if there are "any more surprises left" since all six movies are out and he repeatedly said there would be no more.

So Lucas can think he's the great emperor Napoleon for all I care, but he can't expect intelligent fans to accept it without supporting evidence (other than certain fanboys who'll believe anything he says!).
fun/fantasy movies existed before the overrated Star Wars came out. What made it seem 'less dark' was the sheer goofy aspect of it: two robots modeled on Laurel & Hardy, and a smartass outlaw with bigfoot co-pilot and their hotrod pizza-shaped ship, and they were sucked aboard a giant Disco Ball. -adw1
Someone asked me yesterday if Dracula met Saruman and there was a fight, who would win. I just looked at this man. What an idiotic thing to say. I mean really, it was half-witted. - Christopher Lee

Image
JKA Server 2024
User avatar
Anguirus
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3702
Joined: 2005-09-11 02:36pm
Contact:

Post by Anguirus »

Unless you honestly believe that Lucas had the whole thing planned out and was deliberately spreading misinformation, "yes it does".
If Lucas had the whole thing planned out, then it follows that he would deliberately spread misinformation to do the big reveal in ESB.

That's why this isn't a smoking gun.

Now, DID Lucas have the whole thing planned out from the beginning? Of course not. He "only" knew Vader was Luke's father for five movies. Watch me not care. :lol:
"I spit on metaphysics, sir."

"I pity the woman you marry." -Liberty

This is the guy they want to use to win over "young people?" Are they completely daft? I'd rather vote for a pile of shit than a Jesus freak social regressive.
Here's hoping that his political career goes down in flames and, hopefully, a hilarious gay sex scandal.
-Tanasinn
You can't expect sodomy to ruin every conservative politician in this country. -Battlehymn Republic
My blog, please check out and comment! http://decepticylon.blogspot.com
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

What I like about this old interview more than the Annikin=!Darth Vader, is all the elements that worked their way into the Prequels and Prequel-era EU. Not bad.
Post Reply