Formula 1 Teams to Go Green

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Formula 1 Teams to Go Green

Post by Ace Pace »

Wired.

Pretty neat step, since it's alot of money getting thrown there, better to get some use out of it.


In the hypercompetitive world of Formula 1 motor racing, the only thing greater than the level of technology is the money spent developing it, and a lot of that money is about to be invested in green technology that will appear in cars the rest of us drive.

The biggest teams -- Ferrari, Mercedes-Benz, Honda and Toyota among them -- each spend $200 million or more a year on fossil-fuel technology with little real-world application. But now the sport's ruling body has said, "Enough," and banned further investment in F1 engines. Teams must now focus on hybrid systems and other eco-friendly means of producing power.

"For Formula 1 to do this is a big step forward," said Ron Cogan, editor and publisher of Green Car Journal. "It will bring a lot of new technology to street cars. The old adage is, 'Race on Sunday, sell on Monday.'"

Fuel injection, traction control and semi-automatic transmissions are just some of the innovations developed in race cars, and the racetrack will become a valuable proving ground for emerging automotive technology, experts said.

The 10-year "total freeze" on engine development announced in Paris Oct. 24 is a stunning move. It shows the Federation Internationale de l'Automobile -- the Paris-based organization that governs much of the world's auto racing -- is serious about having F1 lead the way to a greener future. More importantly, it will spur rapid innovation in hybrid and alternative fuel systems.

Auto racing in recent years has recognized the need to be more environmentally friendly, experimenting with biofuels, hydrogen fuel cells and even hybrids. FIA's president, Max Mosley, is determined to make F1 cars more energy-efficient and the engineering behind them more relevant to road cars.

The sport, he has said, is "moving away from the technology of the 20th century to the technology of the 21st. It is only by doing that that we can prevent Formula 1 starting to be labeled as a dinosaur."

Mosley has long sought to rein in the stratospheric sums F1 teams spend each year. Honda, by one estimate, spent $250 million just on engine development in 2006. Mosley has said spending even a fraction of such amounts to develop hybrid and alternative-fuel technology would bring "the most spectacular leaps."

Advocates of green car technology agree, and said such investment by F1 teams -- and the automakers behind them -- would pay big dividends as demand for hybrid and alternative fuel vehicles grows.

"Motorsport, including F1, has a role to play in showcasing what can be achieved with alternatives," said Alan Mercer of Energy Efficient Motorsport, a division of Britain's Department of Trade and Industry that works with the country's racing industry to develop green tech. "Motorsport is a shop window for the automotive manufacturers."

Kinetic-energy recovery systems, which make their F1 debut in 2009, are one area where F1 is already advancing green car technology.

These systems use a flywheel in the transmission to capture the energy generated during braking and store it for use during acceleration. It improves the current technology used in hybrid cars, which rely on heavy batteries to store recovered energy.

At least one F1 team -- no one will say which, citing the sport's intensely competitive and highly secretive atmosphere -- has ordered a kinetic-energy recovery system developed by the British firms Torotrak, Xtrac and Flybrid Systems. The system will generate as much as 80 horsepower without burning an additional drop of fuel.

"This is a significant step toward acceptance of Torotrak's technology for use in mainstream road cars to provide improvements in performance, fuel economy and greenhouse-gas emissions," Dick Elsy, chief executive of Torotrak, said in a statement.

F1 will begin experimenting with biofuels next year, when at least 5.75 percent of the fuel used in racing must come from renewable sources. Looking ahead to 2011, the FIA wants exhaust gases and heat generated by the cars' 2.4 liter, eight-cylinder engines captured and used for propulsion.

Despite the recent push, F1 is behind the curve with regard to green technology. The Indy Racing League, which includes the legendary Indianapolis 500 race, already uses 100-percent ethanol, and General Motors has been pushing NASCAR to adopt a similar rule.

In August, the Ford Fusion Hydrogen 999 set a world record, when it hit 207.279 mph at the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah. That record came three years after a Toyota Prius topped 130 mph there. Another hybrid Toyota, the Supra HV-R, handily won Japan's Tokachi 24-hour endurance race, and a British team has done well racing Honda hybrids in the Formula 1000 rally series.

"We're seeing a lot of inroads being made in motor sports," Cogan said. "We're going to see more and more alternative-fuel and emerging-technology vehicles in racing. It's the way forward."
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
Julhelm
Jedi Master
Posts: 1468
Joined: 2003-01-28 12:03pm
Location: Brutopia
Contact:

Post by Julhelm »

Indycar has been running 100% methanol (now ethanol) ever since a rather horrific accident in (I believe) the 1961 Indy 500.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

This is more about the FIA trying to keep up the popularity of F1 while it’s being forced to massive cut costs owing to a lack of European tobacco advertising then any real concern about going green. The spot has lost millions of fans in recent years from its constant screwing with the rules and

Some teams are going to get totally fucked and might just cease too exist too, because they have problems with there current models of engine. The FIA BTW has also already banned several technologies which could have been used to improve performance without increasing fuel consumption, such as variable geometry spoilers. But then in the end it is nice to see something else coming out of F1; since I can never catch the races on TV anymore. Thank you speed channel for selling your soul and company to NASCAR.

Biofuel is one exception though, several biofuels actually give better racing performance then the high octane pump gas all cars had been FORCED to use previously. That’s why Indy racing was happy to switch to ethanol, the stuff is IIRC 108 octane. The best gasoline anyone makes these days is 100 octane and even that’s getting rarer. Methonal was previously used because it had a higher energy content, and ethanol simply wasn’t available on a commercial scale.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Big Phil
BANNED
Posts: 4555
Joined: 2004-10-15 02:18pm

Post by Big Phil »

FIA would be better off doing something to reduce costs than pulling this PR stunt. $100 million a year per team in operating costs is more than a little excessive. Then freeze on engine development might help to reduce costs some, but they'll be offset by research into aerodynamics to minimize drag on the cars.
In Brazil they say that Pele was the best, but Garrincha was better
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Post by MKSheppard »

Just let them use gas turbines.
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
Post Reply