If Anakin never got burned

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

If Anakin never got burned

Post by Shrykull »

I wonder what kind of a force user he would have become. I also wonder how many midi-chlorians he lost after he got toasted. Remember Palpatine saying he would have become more powerful than either him or Yoda, maybe even Mace too. Turns out he never did anything that impressive that we've seen other Jedi and Sith do. TK, precog, the usual.
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Post by Civil War Man »

I doubt that his quadruple amputation really made Anakin lose midichlorians (I've heard speculation that a midichlorian count is more a measure of density than number). Basically the biggest limitation I've heard regarding Vader is that conjuring lightning would fry his life support.

Similar note. I'm guessing that Vader probably has to deal with a great deal of pain as a result of his condition. Could he still have the same owning everything potential, but needs to spend most of it to keep functioning/not appear weak in front of his flunkies?
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

For all we know midichlorian count is just an indication of force sensitivity, not its cause. I’d assume it takes a fair bit of his power simply to keep himself alive, that machinery might not be the end all of it. Having prosthetic limbs can’t be helping his agility.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Post by Darth Fanboy »

A few details from recent EU novels that might be considered spoilers by some, so I shrunk the font.

Vader being unable to use Force Lightning is confirmed in "Dark Lord", but the same novel also shows Vader tearing through scores of Wookiee soldiers with ease as well as other impressive physical feats. The same book also has Palpatine stating that Vader's weaknessess are psychological, not physical.

"Death Star" shows Vader lamenting the technological deficiencies of the suit. He knows that the Empire could build him a better body, but that he would not survive his removal from the suit into a new one, even with a hyperbaric chamber such as the one on the Executor.

"Allegiance" shows Mara Jade killing the lights in a room in order to avoid being cut down by Vader, whose vision takes a split second longer to adapt to sudden changes in light than natural eyes.

In "Shadows of the Empire", Vader is working on breathing without the aid of his suit and the chamber, but the happiness he feels at his accomplishment inhibits the effect of the Dark Side energies fueling the healing. This indicates to me that Vader still possesses at least some psychological weaknesses later in his career that he might not have had without the suit.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: If Anakin never got burned

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Shrykull wrote:I wonder what kind of a force user he would have become. I also wonder how many midi-chlorians he lost after he got toasted. Remember Palpatine saying he would have become more powerful than either him or Yoda, maybe even Mace too. Turns out he never did anything that impressive that we've seen other Jedi and Sith do. TK, precog, the usual.
People covered the naive assumption of midichlorian values already. However, why should he have "special" powers rather than simply more adept at the ones he does have?
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Ritterin Sophia
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5496
Joined: 2006-07-25 09:32am

Post by Ritterin Sophia »

As has been said midichlorians are an indicator, if midichlorians were the cause then naturally the Iron Knights would be impossible, they're silicon based, sentient, force-using, crystals that were plugged into droids and trained as Jedi. Naturally as crystals they would have no blood, and thus, no midichlorians.
A Certain Clique, HAB, The Chroniclers
User avatar
Alexian Cale
Padawan Learner
Posts: 263
Joined: 2007-07-07 08:53pm

Post by Alexian Cale »

I don't think the amputations lowered the count. DS says that he had 25,000 midichlorians per cell, didn't it?
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

Alexian Cale wrote:I don't think the amputations lowered the count. DS says that he had 25,000 midichlorians per cell, didn't it?
Yeah, and he lost a lot of cells from his amputations and getting burned.

What I meant was, he never did anything really impressive unlike some old Sith Lords such as destroy stars as Nada Sadow did, or use a force storm to destroy a planet (why even bother building the death star if he or the emperor could do it, as they claim that the force's power is greater than that of destroying a planet. Maybe they meant in some other way) or stand up to several Jedi masters and Knights at the same time like it took to take down Exar Kun.
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Post by Shrykull »

General Schatten wrote:As has been said midichlorians are an indicator, if midichlorians were the cause then naturally the Iron Knights would be impossible, they're silicon based, sentient, force-using, crystals that were plugged into droids and trained as Jedi. Naturally as crystals they would have no blood, and thus, no midichlorians.
They would have no cells. But what about when Qui-Gon said no one would have any knowledge of the force if it wasn't for midi chlorians?
Revan's Fire
Youngling
Posts: 95
Joined: 2007-08-10 10:39am
Location: Some far off mystic locale, I'm sure

Post by Revan's Fire »

....It's concentration, not total count that matters. Let's look at this logically. Now, I haven't read Death Star, but if this is to be believed:
Alexian Cale wrote:DS says that he had 25,000 midichlorians per cell
than one simply cannot argue that it is total count.

Remember, 25,000 per cell, and what does Obi-Wan freak out about? That Anakin's midichlorian count is "Over 20,000" that kind of rules out the possibility of what is called midichlorian concentration by Qui-Gon being a total. Unless, Anakin somehow magically had 25,000 midichlorians in one cell, and maybe 2,000 divided amongst all his other ones. As opposed to a density, which make much more sense, and is the only explanation that fits the facts.
"If there's one thing I hate, it's voluptuous whores!"

"I am Advanced Recon Commando A-17, Republic Army, under the command of General Obi-Wan Kenobi. That is all I am authorized to reveal."-Clone Wars Volume 5, Dark Horse Comics
User avatar
Alexian Cale
Padawan Learner
Posts: 263
Joined: 2007-07-07 08:53pm

Post by Alexian Cale »

Shrykull wrote:
Alexian Cale wrote:I don't think the amputations lowered the count. DS says that he had 25,000 midichlorians per cell, didn't it?
Yeah, and he lost a lot of cells from his amputations and getting burned.

What I meant was, he never did anything really impressive unlike some old Sith Lords such as destroy stars as Nada Sadow did, or use a force storm to destroy a planet (why even bother building the death star if he or the emperor could do it, as they claim that the force's power is greater than that of destroying a planet. Maybe they meant in some other way) or stand up to several Jedi masters and Knights at the same time like it took to take down Exar Kun.
Sadow required the use of technology and Sith arcana (his ship) to perform that feat.
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Post by Imperial Overlord »

Alexian Cale wrote:
Sadow required the use of technology and Sith arcana (his ship) to perform that feat.
What's more, a much less skilled Sith was able to blow up a star using the same ship. Clearly the Sith devices in the ship are doing the lion's share of blowing up the star.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
User avatar
Ritterin Sophia
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5496
Joined: 2006-07-25 09:32am

Post by Ritterin Sophia »

Shrykull wrote:
General Schatten wrote:As has been said midichlorians are an indicator, if midichlorians were the cause then naturally the Iron Knights would be impossible, they're silicon based, sentient, force-using, crystals that were plugged into droids and trained as Jedi. Naturally as crystals they would have no blood, and thus, no midichlorians.
They would have no cells. But what about when Qui-Gon said no one would have any knowledge of the force if it wasn't for midi chlorians?
Would you mind giving the exact quote? I have a feeling that it could easily be interpreted as not know about someones force-sensitivity without it.
A Certain Clique, HAB, The Chroniclers
User avatar
Repoman
Village Idiot
Posts: 40
Joined: 2007-11-01 05:55pm
Location: Silver Spring, MD

Post by Repoman »

Unless the human body is constantly manufacturing midichlorians, Anakin lost a LOT of them when he lost his limbs.

But if the midichlorians are able to use the body's resources to multiply (maybe something inherent to the host determines/enables the midichlorians to multiply) then losing the limbs would be only a temporary setback.

I've often wondered if Vader uses the force to control his limbs rather than relying on the neuron/prosthetic bridge.
Image
User avatar
Hawkwings
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3372
Joined: 2005-01-28 09:30pm
Location: USC, LA, CA

Post by Hawkwings »

What people are saying is that the midichlorians might be an *indicator* of force power level, rather than the *cause* of it. So the stronger your force power, the higher your midichlorian density.

So it doesn't matter that he loses the midichlorians in his limbs, because that doesn't affect his force power level. It just means that he's lost the midichlorian indicators in his limbs.
BountyHunterSAx
Padawan Learner
Posts: 401
Joined: 2007-10-09 11:20pm

Post by BountyHunterSAx »

To go back to the TC's original question, I doubt that Anakin *would* have had any new powers, only a new level of comfort with the usual powers. He would have been able to more easily and more readily manipulate force-lightning, use his focus, etc. The reason he wouldn't have gotten new powers is because of whom he was working for, Palpatine, who had a vested interest in a easily controlled and swayable apprentice as opposed to the Darth Tyrannus type.

-AHMAD
User avatar
TithonusSyndrome
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2569
Joined: 2006-10-10 08:15pm
Location: The Money Store

Post by TithonusSyndrome »

If midichlorian totals were all that important, Yoda wouldn't be a very notable Jedi, and Hutt Force users like Beldorion would tower over all other Force users. The loss of cells argument is a dead end.
User avatar
Boeing 757
Padawan Learner
Posts: 338
Joined: 2007-10-30 05:48pm
Location: Εν ενί γαλαξία μένω, ον συ ου δύνασαι ευρείν χωρίς διαστημικού οχήματος.

On Anakin's powers....

Post by Boeing 757 »

I suppose at the very least we could use Expanded Universe Luke as an indicator of what Anakin may have later evolved into, mainly since Luke seems to be on par with Anakin. Luke hastily crushed an AT-AT in Dark Empire and the Reborn Emperor also believed that he possessed the ability to generate Force Storms. In TESB Luke raises his X-wing out of Dagobah's swamp for a few seconds. As Luke is scarcely as knowlegible as Anakin in the ways of the Force, Anakin probably would have done much better, perhaps even equalling Yoda's accomplishment.

From the movies:

Anakin held up reasonably well against a powerhouse such as Dooku in AOTC, and three years further he went on to completely decimate him. We can reasonably conclude from this that even in his later apprenticeship Anakin would have competed fairly well against fully trained Jedi knights (Dooku's considered to be a fairly powerful Jedi Master). Its also my opinion that when Anakin enters dark side rage mode his power in ROTS may rival and/or exceed a Jedi Master's!

With the way Anakin's and Luke's power continues to escalate, one can rationally speculate that Sidious's comment about Anakin growing more power than him or Yoda would have actually come to pass. Obi-Wan thought him to already possess the potential to rival Master Yoda as a swordsman by AOTC. The only thing then limiting Anakin is how well he can control the Force--he already has raw Force ability superior to anyone else.

We can only guess what sort of Force powers Anakin would have possessed, but we can easily infer that Anakin would have been stronger in nearly all known fields of Jedi training.
User avatar
Davey
Padawan Learner
Posts: 368
Joined: 2007-11-25 04:17pm
Location: WTF? Check the directory!

Post by Davey »

If midichlorian totals were all that important, Yoda wouldn't be a very notable Jedi, and Hutt Force users like Beldorion would tower over all other Force users. The loss of cells argument is a dead end.
This is an interesting point. I guess sheer number doesn't mean anything after all.

I'm not exactly sure Anakin lost anything besides some of his agility and a bit of flexibility. He was able to absorb a blaster bolt, then pull it out of Han Solo's hand, something he didn't do in the other movies. At first I thought that Vader's gloves were blaster-proof, but it says in "I, Jedi" that Vader absorbed the energy using the force.

What he lost in agility, he seemed to make up for in brute strength. We all saw how he throttled Captain Antilles and dealt with Luke the first time. If anything, I think he just got more powerful, with the dark side and a robotic body.
Post Reply