Absolutely not, merely that the novelization establishes the following:NecronLord wrote:Are you suggesting the 'Grand Army of the Republic' was the Jedi's private army¹ before that, and that Palpatine wasn't allowed to set them political level objectives?
* That the GAR was commanded by, and reported to, the Jedi Council
* That the Jedi Council acted on directions from the Senate and the novelization also explicitly states that the Jedi reported directly to the Senate and not to the Supreme Chancellor
* That the Supreme Commander, before the amendment to the Security Act, personally didn't have any power over the Jedi Council.
Yes, if we continue to take the ROTS novelization as an example, it does suggest that the chain of command was somewhat diffuse.NecronLord wrote:Otherwise, the most one can argue is that he claimed the title of supreme commander and direct strategic control after the Battle of Coruscant. Before that, Palpatine was clearly directing the Army, although the jedi resented it, at some level. Witness his appointment of Anakin as commander of the fighter forces over Muunilist in the Clone Wars season one.
Agreed.NecronLord wrote:He may well have held that title from the commissioning of the army, or the Order 65 quote we've got may be from a time after Palpatine assumed the office of Supreme Commander.
Yes, that is true, but has the exact circumstances of that been established?NecronLord wrote:Never mind that the RotS novel itself is an example of the poor continuity. We've already had it established that the Jedi are under the de facto direction of the Chancellor's office, from the opening crawl of TPM ("While the Congress of the Republic endlessly debates this alarming chain of events, the Supreme Chancellor has secretly dispatched two Jedi Knights, the guardians of peace and justice in the galaxy, to settle the conflict...")