Clone Army "units"

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Hawkwings
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3372
Joined: 2005-01-28 09:30pm
Location: USC, LA, CA

Clone Army "units"

Post by Hawkwings »

So what is your preferred definition of "unit"? I like to think of it as the smallest group of men + equipment that can perform operations on its own. Or maybe it's like a Marine Expeditionary unit, or an Imperial Guard Regiment. So maybe a "unit" is an Acclamator worth of clones?
User avatar
Fingolfin_Noldor
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11834
Joined: 2006-05-15 10:36am
Location: At the Helm of the HAB Star Dreadnaught Star Fist

Post by Fingolfin_Noldor »

You are threatening to up a huge can of worms, including one Traviss, and assorted others.

But I recall Ender saying that it might mean a platoon or equivalent.
Image
STGOD: Byzantine Empire
Your spirit, diseased as it is, refuses to allow you to give up, no matter what threats you face... and whatever wreckage you leave behind you.
Kreia
Eleventh Century Remnant
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2361
Joined: 2006-11-20 06:52am
Location: Scotland

Post by Eleventh Century Remnant »

From the Imperial Sourcebook, p 92;
line batallions have four companies including an assault company (heavy weapons company) and an HQ, for a total of 606 troopers out of 810 men. a fully equipped assault company raises these totals to 626 and 828. Line batallions are committed to more ground combats than any other type of unit in the galaxy, as a batallion is the usual minimum Imperial commanders will consider dropping for a surface operation, and line batallions are more common than any other type.
Underlining mine. I don't object to this at all, it seems reasonable enough.
An Acclamator's 16K
clone troops and support personnel
works out at 19.3 batallions, which is either a reinforced battlegroup just shy of five full regiments, or an infantry division with the extra 3.3 batallions' worth absorbed by walkers, gunships, and divisional level attachments- medics, workshops, combat engineers, staff functions.
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Post by Darth Fanboy »

From this site.
unit. [JP 1-02] (DoD, NATO)

l Any military element whose structure is prescribed by competent authority, such as a table of organization and equipment; specifically, part of an organization.

l An organization title of a subdivision of a group in a task force.


l A standard or basic quantity into which an item of supply is divided, issued, or used. In this meaning, also called unit of issue.

l With regard to reserve components of the Armed Forces, denotes a Selected Reserve unit organized, equipped and trained for mobilization to serve on active duty as a unit or to augment or be augmented by another unit. Headquarters and support functions without wartime missions are not considered units.

Karen Travesty prides herself on her ability to write for the military so OBVIOUSLY she must have known about the terminology already... :roll:

If to her, unit = 1 soldier, then that will hopefully be shot out of the water with the size and scope of the battles George Lucas wants to include in his new TV shows.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Post by Aaron »

If Traviss really knew anything about the military she'd know that when a soldier refers to his "unit" it typically refers to the whole fucking thing, IE: 1st Battalion Royal Canadian Regiment or 2 Sigs Squadron. Formations that are a battalion and a reienforced company in size respectivelly. When they say "units" in AOTC I take it to mean battalion because that's what it means in the real world. Especially as this is a massive war, troops are unlikely to be deployed in less than battalion strength unless their Special Ops or they just need a lone company somewhere, in which case you may as well send the entire battalion with it's support equipment.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Cyborg Stan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 849
Joined: 2002-12-10 01:59am
Location: Still Hungry.
Contact:

Post by Cyborg Stan »

Personally, I think it would've been real awesome if in AotC, upon hearing 3 million 'units' -
Obi-Wan : Soldiers?

Cloner : (Tilting the head oddly... well, odder than usual anyway.) Armies.
ASVS Vets Assoc, Class of 1999

Geh Ick Bleah

Avatar is an image of Yuyuko Saigyouji from the Touhou Series.
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

Well, for a lower limit, a four man fireteam is a unit. Normally when some one askes 'where you from' in the military, you can give your platoon/company/battelion or perhaps regiment.

Weapons Platoon, I Co, 3rdBn 5thMar for example. However a more common one was just the Bn and Regiment. 3/5.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
fnord
Jedi Knight
Posts: 950
Joined: 2005-09-18 08:09am
Location: You're not cleared for that

Post by fnord »

What's the smallest group of troops that counts as a "formation"? A battalion? Or does it vary by the force involved? Ie, a battalion (since I seem to be on a roll) might be a formation in the Royal Dutch Marines but not one in the US Army?

Also, what would be the smallest troop grouping expected to stand on its own in the line of battle? (If it ain't a division, then I'll need to rewrite my Traveller fanfic).
(name here)
Youngling
Posts: 103
Joined: 2007-03-17 10:00pm

Post by (name here) »

Squad is the minimum possibility, although soldiers would be possible if it weren't such a small figure. minimum figure that makes any sense: 12million. probably more, unit might refer to platoon or line battalion.
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

Darth Fanboy wrote:From this site.
unit. [JP 1-02] (DoD, NATO)

l Any military element whose structure is prescribed by competent authority, such as a table of organization and equipment; specifically, part of an organization.

l An organization title of a subdivision of a group in a task force.


l A standard or basic quantity into which an item of supply is divided, issued, or used. In this meaning, also called unit of issue.

l With regard to reserve components of the Armed Forces, denotes a Selected Reserve unit organized, equipped and trained for mobilization to serve on active duty as a unit or to augment or be augmented by another unit. Headquarters and support functions without wartime missions are not considered units.

Karen Travesty prides herself on her ability to write for the military so OBVIOUSLY she must have known about the terminology already... :roll:

If to her, unit = 1 soldier, then that will hopefully be shot out of the water with the size and scope of the battles George Lucas wants to include in his new TV shows.
In all fairness, the 1 unit = 1 soldier doesn't originate from Karen Traviss, but from the AOTC novelization (by R.A. Salvatore). However, as someone pointed out in an earlier thread (I believe it was VT-16), when Mace Windu steps out of the gunship and a clone commander informs him that there are "five special commando units awaiting your orders", we see a good deal more than five individual clone soldiers following his lead. The screenplay doesn't lend credence to the idea either.

My preferred unit, and which makes the most sense IMHO, would be a battalion (the true size which can be seen at the end of AOTC, 624 men per battalion and not the 576 men per battalion which Traviss and Kaufman grabbed out of thin air in Insider #84).
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

(name here) wrote:Squad is the minimum possibility, although soldiers would be possible if it weren't such a small figure. minimum figure that makes any sense: 12million. probably more, unit might refer to platoon or line battalion.

Gah, fireteam. Yeesh, why do I even bother typing out these things. :roll:



:P
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

Perhaps I should add as a side-note that my gut feeling (which is far from revolutionary I admit) is that George Lucas consciously chose a slightly ambiguous term to describe the size of the GAR. The screenplay does differentiate between 'items' (as used by Lama Su to describe the individual clones at the parade ground on Kamino) and 'units'.
User avatar
Repoman
Village Idiot
Posts: 40
Joined: 2007-11-01 05:55pm
Location: Silver Spring, MD

Post by Repoman »

Cpl Kendall wrote:If Traviss really knew anything about the military she'd know that when a soldier refers to his "unit" it typically refers to the whole fucking thing, IE: 1st Battalion Royal Canadian Regiment or 2 Sigs Squadron. Formations that are a battalion and a reienforced company in size respectivelly. When they say "units" in AOTC I take it to mean battalion because that's what it means in the real world.
This is true. WHenever a soldier is asked what "unit" he is in, he or she will usually respond with the battalion level answer.

However, if you are assigned to a detachable support company, you would typically respond with your company designation and assigned home base (i.e. 103 Chemical company, Ft. Bragg).

It is also worth noting that the operations shops (S-3, G-3, whatever) will refer to detached, smaller than company-level elements as "units".
Image
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

Traviss thinking that a "unit" referred to one soldier, rather than one regiment/battallion, seems to suggest a greater familiarity with computer strategy games than with real-life militaries.
Cpl Kendall wrote:If Traviss really knew anything about the military she'd know that when a soldier refers to his "unit" it typically refers to the whole fucking thing
When a soldier refers to his unit he refers to the thing he fucks with.. makes sense.
Sorry, couldn't help. :lol:
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

When I saw the film, I too got the impression that 'unit' was meant to show the Kaminoan distance from individuals, and that they were reffering to individuals. It is certainly strange that she doesn't say "Two hundred thousand regiments ready..."

But item is even more dehumanising, and thus better.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

NecronLord wrote:It is certainly strange that she doesn't say "Two hundred thousand regiments ready..."
If she was in fact referring to individual clones, it is more strange that she doesn't simply say "..two hundred thousand clones ready..."

When raising an military force, one would assume that a ready "unit" refers to a military unit.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
PainRack
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7583
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:03am
Location: Singapura

Post by PainRack »

Cykeisme wrote:
NecronLord wrote:It is certainly strange that she doesn't say "Two hundred thousand regiments ready..."
If she was in fact referring to individual clones, it is more strange that she doesn't simply say "..two hundred thousand clones ready..."

When raising an military force, one would assume that a ready "unit" refers to a military unit.
The novelisation makes it clear that from Obiwan POV, this made the cloners even more inhumane as they were referring to people as nothing more than goods.
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
User avatar
CaptJodan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2217
Joined: 2003-05-27 09:57pm
Location: Orlando, Florida

Post by CaptJodan »

Repoman wrote:This is true. WHenever a soldier is asked what "unit" he is in, he or she will usually respond with the battalion level answer.
I always assumed, though perhaps with very little evidence, that units might refer to Battalion as well. I base it on Lama Su's last comment to Obi-Wan.
LAMA SU: Tell your Council the first battalions are ready.
And remind them that if they need more troops, we will need
time to grow them.
Considering he was told some units were already avaliable, I just put these two together. Of course, as I said, there's no real connection other than the fact that 200,000 "units" are "ready" and the first "battalions" are ready.
It's Jodan, not Jordan. If you can't quote it right, I will mock you.
Post Reply