Another hypothetical naval vessel

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Post Reply
User avatar
Manji
Deimos Sock Puppet
Posts: 147
Joined: 2002-07-09 06:16pm
Location: The ancient forest.

Another hypothetical naval vessel

Post by Manji »

Ohio class SSBN.

Missiles removed.

Interior decks in missile compartment removed, leaving an enormous five story cavity inside the submarine, which is then used to insert...

The turret barbette of an Iowa class BB, topped with a triple turret of 16" guns.

Result: Sub-mounted Iowa turret.

Surface, bombard shore, dive.

Practical?

Not too practical?

Too problematic?

Stupid?

Other?
Image
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

ROFL!
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Pablo Sanchez
Commissar
Posts: 6998
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:41pm
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Another hypothetical naval vessel

Post by Pablo Sanchez »

Manji wrote:Stupid?
Yes.
Image
"I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war."
--The Lord Humungus
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Re: Another hypothetical naval vessel

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Pablo Sanchez wrote: Yes.



Very.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Why would we take a sub and simultaneously lower both its firepower and range and versatility while making it more detectable? It just doesn't work.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

Once again, really, really retarded. And it can't even be done, since the turret barbette is far too wide anyway, and besides its heavy enough to sink the ship.

A better idea is to load up the space with MLRS type rockets or VLS tubes. As a matter of fact, that's what they want to do to the four subs already in the reserve fleet.
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
User avatar
TrailerParkJawa
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5850
Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
Location: San Jose, California

Post by TrailerParkJawa »

A better idea is to load up the space with MLRS type rockets or VLS tubes. As a matter of fact, that's what they want to do to the four subs already in the reserve fleet.
Yeah, they wanna make 4 boomers into cruise missle submarines. I dont see the need considering that 688 subs, destroyers, cruisers, B-52's, etc can all already carry cruise missles.

Gee, could it be the boomer community is trying to find a role for itself. :roll:

But RayCav is right, its a better idea than putting a huge turret on a sub.
I wonder if the sub would do a full barrel roll after firing such a big gun? :P
User avatar
Beowulf
The Patrician
Posts: 10621
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:18am
Location: 32ULV

Post by Beowulf »

TrailerParkJawa wrote: But RayCav is right, its a better idea than putting a huge turret on a sub.
I wonder if the sub would do a full barrel roll after firing such a big gun? :P
More likely half barrel roll, then a thousand foot dive.
"preemptive killing of cops might not be such a bad idea from a personal saftey[sic] standpoint..." --Keevan Colton
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
User avatar
Mr. B
Jedi Knight
Posts: 921
Joined: 2002-07-13 02:16am
Location: My own little corner of Hell.

Post by Mr. B »

STOP PLEASE! NO MORE MORONIC IDEAS!

IT"S LIKE WATCHING VOYAGER AND ENTERPRISE AT ONCE!!!!

FOR THE LOVE OF BOB STOP!!!!!!
"I got so high last night I figured out how clouds work." - the miracle of marijuana

Legalize It!

Proud Member of the local 404 Professional Cynics Union.

"Every Revolution carries within it the seeds of its own destruction."-Dune
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Stupid and pointless, the recoil is too much for the hull, and the turret too wide..


However, its not as absurd as his other ideas, The British after all mounted a 12 inch gun removed from a predreanought on the three subs of the M class in 1917.

They could surface, fire and dive in 90 seconds and had 40 rounds of ammunition. However reloading required a full surfacing.

They proved quite useless, and two were converted to other roles in 1927, the third was rammed and sunk by accident in 1925
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
XaLEv
Lore Monkey
Posts: 5372
Joined: 2002-07-04 06:35am

Post by XaLEv »

Better than the mile long blimp.
「かかっ―」
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Hard to say. I think the blimp could fire its weaponry without self-destructing.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
Post Reply