Teacher being sued for anti-religious remarks

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Oni Koneko Damien
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3852
Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
Contact:

Post by Oni Koneko Damien »

So, according to his statement, he's not even attacking Christianity. He's attacking fundamentalists, on both the Christian and Muslim ends, pointing out how they're the nastiest parts of the religions, and how poorly they treat women.

So, by going on a rampage against this, aren't all these students and 'concerned parents' admitting, by default, that they represent this backwards, misogynistic, detestable sect of religion in general?

...then again, they're actively attempting to sue someone for saying something that less than outright praising their pet god, so the question is sort of moot. Pity they'll never see the irony here.
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Oni Koneko Damien wrote:So, according to his statement, he's not even attacking Christianity. He's attacking fundamentalists, on both the Christian and Muslim ends, pointing out how they're the nastiest parts of the religions, and how poorly they treat women.

So, by going on a rampage against this, aren't all these students and 'concerned parents' admitting, by default, that they represent this backwards, misogynistic, detestable sect of religion in general?
No, don't you see? The problem is that he wrongly thinks fundamentalism is backwards, misogynistic, and detestable, and then he has the cajones to turn around and say so in class. Clearly, he is an atheist who hates all Christians and hates America and democracy, too, for good measure. He's probably a pedophile, too, with those attitudes about God; I don't know why they let him hang around kids.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
wolveraptor
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4042
Joined: 2004-12-18 06:09pm

Post by wolveraptor »

Oni Koneko Damien wrote:So, according to his statement, he's not even attacking Christianity. He's attacking fundamentalists, on both the Christian and Muslim ends, pointing out how they're the nastiest parts of the religions, and how poorly they treat women.
Exactly. And then they're whining about how he's not representing the other side. For fuck's sake, the "other side" is a bunch of misogynistic assholes. Who wants that kind of opinion represented anyways?
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

They say there are two sides to every story, but that doesn't mean both of them should be given equal space in textbooks. This "show both sides" argument was bullshit when Holocause Deniers tried it, and it's bullshit now.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Post Reply