[Discussion] CloudStrife433

[fgalkin]

This grot

Worthless spammer, /b/tard, and just plain regular 'tard contributing absolutely nothing to the board, except filling it with spam.

Theres not nearly enough cake.

Then again, the cake was a lie.

All is well and as it should be.

Civ 4 Rule 34.

And numerous similar shit, coming to a Testing thread near you (thanks to the efforts of your dedicated mod staff, the tard himself smaps anywhere but Testing.

He also provokes our resident grots into starting spamfests, as seen here

RIGHT!!!!

Answer me, how long did you lurk before joining?

I don't lurk anywhere.
And I don't brag about myself. Because I actually have better things to talk about.

Also, his introduction thread gets a mention as the lamest ever

Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villian by the vicissitudes of Fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation, stands vivified and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition. The only verdict is vengence; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it is my very good honor to meet you and you may call me CloudStrife433.

It currently resides in the HoS.

For the good of the board, as well as to keep the spam levels down, I propose a permban on this pathetic creature.

Honorable members of the Senate, please discuss.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

[Stravo]

Say goodbye to this vile lamer and let's be done with it right quick. He should have been banned just based on that pathetic cut and paste introduction post.

[Simplicius]

He should be banned, for the same reason that litter should be swept up off the sidewalk.

[LadyTevar]

I also say skip the Title and go straight to the BanPoll.

[Frank Hipper]

Perhaps Mike will grant us a boon when he logs in next, and he'll remove this irritant without ceremony.

[GrandMasterTerwynn]

Unrepentant spammer who is entirely unfazed by moderator warnings and having all his threads flushed?

Yeah. Worthless. Banninate him.

[Publius]

This rather looks like there is a motion to ban, and a second.

[Surlethe]

I would prefer to title him and put him on notice instead of ban him, because he is unintentionally hilarious. He takes himself soooo seriously, it's like watching a little chihuaha get up in arms and start puffing and growling at a great dane.

Like this:

Know this, I am a vindictive bastard.
If they fuck with me, they will incur the full wrath I garner.
I have sacrificed shit just to get back at someone.
And I really don't think that legally there is anything they could do anyway. Video cameras exist at the raids for these reasons.

I mean, the comedy just writes itself.

[CmdrWilkens]

Without expressing much of an opinion one way or another I am going to rather openly remind folks of the dustups on the speed of voting we have had in the past. I do want to put if back in everyone's minds to actually give a decent portion of the Senate a chance to see the information and respond before moving to a poll.

As one final aside if someone is planning on starting a vote I would advise they reaquaint themselves with the rules.

[Master of Ossus]

[Thumbs down]

Begone with him!

(I'll second the ban poll, if it wasn't official, already).

[Spyder]

Kill it before it breeds, you'll have plenty of time.

[phongn]

Soontir seems to have dug up some information on him elsewhere (yes, I realize other boards are none of our concern), but in this case it pretty much shows him to be utterly worthless. That said, so far I am enjoying the unintentional hilarity, as Sen. Surlethe would put it.

Ok, I can't fall asleep.

So you don't have to search through the results if you would've bothered anyway:
Listed as I found them but 3, 5, and 6 are lovely.

1. Under sephy26946
2. His own vacuous blog with a score of -2 on that website.
3. Another message board where SD.net is not the only place his threads get locked.
4. An IGN thread where users are calling him a loser and telling him to leave for more than one page.
5. Got himself banned from the Christian Teen Forums for most likely trying to be "evil" by posting Harry Potter spoilers. How lame.
6. I like this gem:

   I post in a certain manner where you should not take all my threads for serious. I am used to posting in a style from another site that I am banned from, hence why I am here and not there. You really want me gone, petition my ban on IGN. Sephy26946

   Succinctly why he's nothing.
7. LiveJournal replies to his post correcting his grammar and spelling when he claims there's no 'grammer' issues with the fic he was "editing".

So what's next? 'I don't show my intelligence on the internet?'

[Edi]

I'm of the opinion we should boot that worthless turd out of here as soon as possible.

[Spin Echo]

Ban. I think it's highly unlikely he'll shape up.

[The Duchess of Zeon]

Idiots like that just cause trouble even if "unintentionally hilarious" because they become focal points for others who cause trouble. Ban.

[Dalton]

Ban poll authorized.

[Surlethe]

While the discussion thread is still open:

Could someone have maybe fucking told me that one? Sometimes I either don't have anything more to contribute at the time or I just don't want to add any more to the post than a short line and the link to the article. Sorry that I didn't know what exactly you expected, not all of this was in the rules.

So he didn't read the rules:

PR 5: "The "me too" rule. Do not post in threads simply to add some kind of vacuous one-liner. If you're going to post in a thread (particularly a serious discussion thread), you should put some effort into your post."

PR 14: "News articles are to be posted in full. There are some places where such is rather difficult, because of need of user registration or format. These will be the only exception of this particular rule."

[Spyder]

Wow, 15-0-0 unaniban. We really don't like this kid.

[LadyTevar]

The little shitstain's been PMing me as well. Am I the only one he's trying to chat up?

[Spyder]

No one else has mentioned anything.

I can never attract stalkers, I guess my gallery pics don't show enough leg or something.

[fgalkin]

The little shitstain's been PMing me as well. Am I the only one he's trying to chat up?

He PMed me, too, asking for examples of his trolling.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

[Dalton]

We can now officially add "harassing PMs" to his list of charges.