The human leadership in the story probably don't have a good idea of demon combat capabilities vs armoured vehicles yet either. But as I suggested earlier, the complex and expensive armour composition optimised to stop high-velocity penetrators is unlikely to be relevant. I am by no means an expert in this - but for protection against low-velocity bashing and tearing (the demons haven't demonstrated anything exotic like monomolecular blades/claws) simple RHA seems likely to be just as good and much cheaper.Sea Skimmer wrote:Well I have no idea just what armor they deleted (my guess would be the various secret bits of the composite protection), nor just how strong the various demons are going to be in close combat, so I couldn’t answer that one.
That would be fine for rear-echelon units that are always escorted by adequate AAA and have a low probability of being overrun by demonic cavalry/infantry. As Stuart noted, there will undoubtadly be plenty of these. But for strikes and counterattack, you're going to want something well armoured enough that it can't be easily taken out by any demon that gets close. MBT armour might still be overkill though; something like the MGS gun mount on a Bradley hull might do the same job cheaper, but probably not cheaper enough to justify the cost of switching over production from tried and true MBT designs in wartime.If you really wanted more mobile guns at the lowest possible cost, then you could just take a big truck and mount a 122mm howitzer on it, with a simple gun shield and 40 gallon vodka barrel.
Another problem with economising by using IFV/APC hulls for strike vehicles; even if they're enough to resist demon weapons, machine guns might not cut it for 'hosing the enemy infantry off friendly vehicles' when the enemy infantry consists of raging giant demons. Presumably MBT armour would allow you to use autocannon in this role with a reasonably low chance of destroying the vehicle you're trying to help? Certainly I would expect the coaxial MG to be uprated from 7.42 to at least .50 on the new-build tanks.
I confess it would be funny to see a group of Strykers ambushed and although their hulls resist the initial attack, they get their tyres ripped to shreds by demon claws and/or melted by fire breath, allowing them to be destroyed at leisure.
The US seems to be relying more on building new ones. Europe is presumably in an even worse position regarding mothballed weapons, and probably has less rampable heavy industry capacity than the US too. If anyone is going to build an 'economy tank', Europe seems the most likely (someone more knowledgable than me would have to suggest what existing platforms/components can be adapted for the role).If the Russians really wanted to produce an economy tank, they’d probably simplify it a lot more then just reducing armor. I don’t see the need for new built economy tanks though; they’ve got hoards of old vehicles they can throw into action already as Slade has already mentioned.
The last chapter mentions restarting M1A2 part production. Whole tanks seems almost certain given the general tone.Sidewinder wrote:Some questions. Is the US going to put the M1 series tanks back in production, or is that no longer possible?
Good point, particularly with regard to Europe and to a lesser extent Japan.What about gun control? With millions of demons running around, able to appear anywhere, I imagine a LOT of people in a LOT of places will demand self-defense weapons.