Wow I didn't think Trekkies could get this stupid.

Khemri · Post by **Khemri** » 2003-01-21 03:23pm

http://home.att.net/~tomjlee/startrek/index.html

The Type-11 superlaser cannon of the first "Death Star" was equipped with the capacitance banks for a 24-hour charge at the weapon's maximum power of 4 GW and used eight Type-10 turbolasers to generate the initial multistranded beam, while the second Death Star's superlaser had three sets of capacitance banks that charged simultaneously (and could be fully discharged with as little as 24 minutes between each other) but one less turbolaser to generate the initial multistrand beam. Although the maximum 345.6 terajoules either superlaser could direct, even with their base KE multiplier of 1,000 and their antiproton beam composition, would not ordinarily be capable of shattering a Class-M planet, the ingenuity (misplaced as it was) of the superlaser's designers enabled it to generate beams of higher antiproton densities at higher charge levels (as opposed to generating a wider beam with the same density of antiprotons). This resulted in the superlaser having an exponential effect/charge curve which, after the initial 1-hour charge of 14.4 terajoules was attained, increased the generated beam’s overall kinetic energy equivalent at the rate of an order of magnitude every 90 minutes up until the end of the 24th hour of charging. Consequently, a Death Star-type superlaser could, at "full power" (in the words of the late Grand Moff Tarkin), direct the equivalent of 3.1*1032 J in 0.3 seconds.

Check out the Wars page too, Turbolasers are rated at an impressive 2 kilowatts!

Rightous Fist Of Heaven · Post by **Rightous Fist Of Heaven** » 2003-01-21 03:25pm

This page has allready been shown in here, and IIRC the dude who made the site admitted he had pulled all that stuff from his ass.

Post by **Lagmonster** » 2003-01-21 03:28pm

Trekkies really...really HATE the superlaser. They loathe it. Hearing about it to them is like going to school and finding that they've installed foot-long metal rods on all the seats.

They don't mind ISDs, Jedi, the Force, planetary shields, the works...but that darned superlaser makes a trekkie's froth boil out every time it gets mentioned.

Khemri · Post by **Khemri** » 2003-01-21 03:33pm

Lagmonster wrote:Trekkies really...really HATE the superlaser. They loathe it. Hearing about it to them is like going to school and finding that they've installed foot-long metal rods on all the seats.

They don't mind ISDs, Jedi, the Force, planetary shields, the works...but that darned superlaser makes a trekkie's froth boil out every time it gets mentioned.

It's still pretty sad when the rays from our sun put other more enegry than a Star Destroyer's Heavy guns.......

Enlightenment · Post by **Enlightenment** » 2003-01-21 04:07pm

Khemri wrote:Check out the Wars page too, Turbolasers are rated at an impressive 2 kilowatts!

LOL.

Averaged over the lifetime of a turbolaser, maybe... But in terms of peak firepower, can you say, "stand back, I have a searchlight?"

Artanis · Post by **Artanis** » 2003-01-21 04:16pm

THE GOGGLES! THEY DO NOTHING!

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2003-01-21 04:22pm

He is always held up as the pinical of Trekky Wanking

Singular Quartet · Post by **Singular Quartet** » 2003-01-21 04:44pm

Figures this would be posted here. Even with my limited knowledge of the debates, I figure somebody has to deal with it. Hopefully I can civilally beat some sense into him.

Singular Quartet · Post by **Singular Quartet** » 2003-01-21 04:48pm

Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:This page has allready been shown in here, and IIRC the dude who made the site admitted he had pulled all that stuff from his ass.

He has? Well, I'll find out anyways...

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-01-21 04:51pm

Khemri wrote:It's still pretty sad when the rays from our sun put other more enegry than a Star Destroyer's Heavy guns.......

Do they? I don't have the numbers off the top of my head, but considering the size discrepancy, its not all that pitiful, especially when Trek weapons are even less powerful by several orders of magnitude.

Singular Quartet · Post by **Singular Quartet** » 2003-01-21 05:01pm

Darth Servo wrote:
Khemri wrote:It's still pretty sad when the rays from our sun put other more enegry than a Star Destroyer's Heavy guns.......
Do they? I don't have the numbers off the top of my head, but considering the size discrepancy, its not all that pitiful, especially when Trek weapons are even less powerful by several orders of magnitude.

Trekkie Uber-wank, otherwise known as Thomas Lee wrote: Escort USS Defiant, NX-74205

* Launched 2375 as USS Sao Paulo, NCC-75633
* Defiant Class
* Length 341m, Mass 100,000 tons
* 0 to Warp 1 in 8.5 seconds
* 180 degrees/sec maneuverability
* 1 kilocochrane hyperdrive core
* 1 megacochrane warp core
* Warp 7 (117,649c) Cruise, Warp 10 (1,000,000c) Emergency
* 4 Type-8 turbophaser cannons (5.1 yottawatts)
4 Type-7 turbophaser cannons (510 zetawatts)
45 Type-6 superphasers (510 exawatts) in 4 arrays
* 4 Type-6 pulse-fire quantum torpedo tubes (@3 torpedoes / 15s) with @60 casings
4 Type-6 photon torpedo tubes (@1 torpedo / 30s) with @10 casings
* 5 isomegaton quantum torpedoes, 2 isokiloton photon torpedoes
* Castrodium/neutronium single hull
40cm multilayer ablative armor
* Subspace-amplified EM/gravitic structural integrity field system
45 yottawatt secondary energy dissipation rate (hull)
450 yottawatt primary energy dissipation rate (armor)
2.38*1045 J instantaneous directed KE capacity
* Subspace-amplified EM/gravitic navigational deflector system
* Automodulating regenerative subspace-amplified EM/gravitic defensive grid
4.5 kiloyottawatt tertiary energy dissipation rate (defense fields)
45 kiloyottawatt secondary energy dissipation rate (deflector screens)
450 kiloyottawatt primary energy dissipation rate (forcefield shields)
2.4*1048 J instantaneous directed KE capacity
* Planetfall capability
* "All I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by." - John Masefield

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2003-01-21 05:02pm

Is this the same wanker who said the E-E was 16,000 meters long?

Rightous Fist Of Heaven · Post by **Rightous Fist Of Heaven** » 2003-01-21 05:02pm

Mr Bean wrote:He is always held up as the pinical of Trekky Wanking

WHO COULD RESIST THE ALLMIGHTY 16 KM SOVEREIGN WITH 5250 Type-12 megaphasers EACH WITH THE POWER OF 7.2 MEGAYOTAWATTS!!!!

spaceluigi · Post by **spaceluigi** » 2003-01-21 05:32pm

The Sovereign is 680 meters long. 16 km... is a bit less than the Eclipse SSD.

-- Luigi

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2003-01-21 05:32pm

spaceluigi wrote:The Sovereign is 680 meters long. 16 km... is a bit less than the Eclipse SSD.

-- Luigi

Yes. the site admin is a moron.

Enlightenment · Post by **Enlightenment** » 2003-01-21 05:33pm

spaceluigi wrote:The Sovereign is 680 meters long. 16 km... is a bit less than the Eclipse SSD.

Congratulations. You are the master of the obvious.

Shadow Walker · Post by **Shadow Walker** » 2003-01-21 06:14pm

*Sigh* Never underestimate the pradictability of stupidity.

Singular Quartet · Post by **Singular Quartet** » 2003-01-21 06:21pm

I didn't mention the sizes of ships, mostly because I wasn't really thinking about them... but the E-E as 16km long? laughable. If he respondes to my e-mail, I'll send off one about ship sizes.

Oh,a nd looking through his links, he lists Dark-fucker, DITL, SB.com, TrekBBS, and Curtis Saxton, all on one page. It just doesn't seem right.

Singular Quartet · Post by **Singular Quartet** » 2003-01-21 06:26pm

Singuler Quartet wrote:I didn't mention the sizes of ships, mostly because I wasn't really thinking about them... but the E-E as 16km long? laughable. If he respondes to my e-mail, I'll send off one about ship sizes.

Oh,a nd looking through his links, he lists Dark-fucker, DITL, SB.com, TrekBBS, and Curtis Saxton, all on one page. It just doesn't seem right.

In addition, since there is no edit button, it appears that the only grossly exagerated starship is the E-E, most of the others have only been increased by a factor of 2 or 3, whereas the E-E...

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2003-01-21 06:32pm

I shudded to think what he will do with the Scimitar. We have a known count of its weapons, but he will screw it up anyway.

Slartibartfast · Post by **Slartibartfast** » 2003-01-21 06:50pm

Khemri wrote:http://home.att.net/~tomjlee/startrek/index.html

<snip>

Check out the Wars page too, Turbolasers are rated at an impressive 2 kilowatts!

C'mon, you can do better than that! Check the power output of the lasers in a TIE fighter, and try to rationalize why we haven't been killed by the lightbulb in our bedrooms...

Slartibartfast · Post by **Slartibartfast** » 2003-01-21 06:51pm

Not to mention that he thinks the Galaxy is 50000 kilometres long and the Sovereign is 100000 kilometres long.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-01-21 06:56pm

Hey, it's been posted here several times before, but it's so stupid, it should be!

Anyway the numbers are all pulled out his ass, probably while masturbating to the thought of one GCS destroying the entire Imperial Fleet.

http://home.att.net/~tomjlee/starwars/map.html

Also, check the nonsense on this page.

Admiral Drason · Post by **Admiral Drason** » 2003-01-21 07:00pm

All I need is a six pack of light balbs and a AA battery and Ill build you a Death Star.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-01-21 07:53pm

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:Hey, it's been posted here several times before, but it's so stupid, it should be!

Anyway the numbers are all pulled out his ass, probably while masturbating to the thought of one GCS destroying the entire Imperial Fleet.

http://home.att.net/~tomjlee/starwars/map.html

Also, check the nonsense on this page.

Just love that Bullshit. Both he and Dark Star subscribe to the nonsense about the map in AOTC zooming in to Kamino around the Galactic core, even though the zoom itself prevents us from knowing where the final location of Kamino really is. They assume is stopped in the center of the galaxy. The evidence for this claim? None.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Wow I didn't think Trekkies could get this stupid.

Wow I didn't think Trekkies could get this stupid.

Re: Wow I didn't think Trekkies could get this stupid.

Umm...

Re: Umm...

Re: Umm...

Re: Wow I didn't think Trekkies could get this stupid.