Moderator: Vympel
Why thats a wonderful idea! I know we should have all the Sci-Fi fans get togther and talk about Peace!PEACE BETWEEN ALL SCI-FI FANS.
Keep us informed. I'd love to see him receive the Imperial Smackdown (tm) he so richly deserves.Darth Wong wrote:Well, that was certainly entertaining, wasn't it? I'm waiting for Bernd to reply to my E-mail, but I doubt I'll get a reply.
Never a dull moment
And yes, Minutaeman is trying to say that I've completely lost the high ground for remarking on Schneider's ridiculous claim that field-based technologies automatically mean perfect accuracy, as if an on-topic technical criticism is somehow just as heinous as a string of personal attacks on character over a period of years.Fenis Demens CCXXI wrote:We're all aware of the nature of the StarDestroyer.net boards; tumultuous, foul-mouthed, et cetera. But their minds are set, unable to be changed. Let them stay that way.
Sure..Bernt wrote:This is much worse than I thought. It just isn't possible to be more narrow-minded, ignorant and intolerant than the guys over there. Of course, if someone comes along to a closed community and makes some critical remarks, he is subject to be flamed.
But you made all valid points, Ed - or at least points that should be taken into consideration and commented. But instead of listening they only come up with their usual prejudices and completely irrelevant findings and take it down to insults. I once made a quite similar experience with fanatic followers in a forum where I posted (although the topic was not scifi but something completely different).
And what are the threats about your name and IP about? Since when is it required to reveal one's real name and IP to everyone? Wong's law?
That place is a stinking hell of fascist assholes. If Wong has any honor left, he should close it down, for the benefit of the whole SW fandom which is damaging its own reputation there.
Gotta love these:Although I did go over there, I didnt try to stir anything up, and I did not connect us to them in any way, different nick and everything. And im using a firewall with IP blocker on so I doubt with someone with as little IQ as they have would be able to crack it.
Maybe we should change the title to:
'IDIC, or why rabid Warsies on the SD net forum should be left with their heads stuck up their hindquarters'.
Do they try to prove that the Imperialists can destroy any UFP ship with a single shot??? I'd like to see that. Sometimes ignorance is bliss...
Jesus, and they say we are out of line when we start insulting back.Maybe not, but I wouldn't risk it. If you gotta go over there, use the IP blocker and a different name. I personally find their arguments without logic and you'd probably keep your sanity a little better if you just stay here. It's safe here...
He obviously thinks that NAT hides his IP, when all it does is hide the internal IP addresses of his LAN, not his connection to the Internet, which is the only IP that matters for tracking people down. What a geniusEnlightenment wrote:It speaks volumes about this guy's technical aptitude that he thinks an 'ip blocking firewall' is even technically possible.
Fuck you beat me to it.Enlightenment wrote:It speaks volumes about this guy's technical aptitude that he thinks an 'ip blocking firewall' is even technically possible.
*flak* Leave the paranoids alone. If the rabid trekkies want to bash us they have every right to do so on their turf. We have every right to bash them on our turf.Ender wrote:As long as I don't catch flak for it here and get banned for "starting a forum war' I'm up for it.
Oh, but of course, we're the bad guys. After all, trashing a TV show is really no different than trashing individual human beingsEAS trolls wrote:Actually, it all comes down to that you have your heads up your asses so much that you wont accept anything different than Wars, and anything shlightly off your opinion you bash mindlessly using a bad combination of fact and fasification because you are scared to admit that just because you like Wars better than other Sci-fi, others are just as good oand other people have opinions different than you.
Just to clarify a bit.Faram wrote:Fuck you beat me to it.Enlightenment wrote:It speaks volumes about this guy's technical aptitude that he thinks an 'ip blocking firewall' is even technically possible.
They've been conducting a board war for some time; they were just hoping we wouldn't notice, and now they're screaming "no mas!" the minute we find out. Pathetic.Enlightenment wrote:*flak* Leave the paranoids alone. If the rabid trekkies want to bash us they have every right to do so on their turf. We have every right to bash them on our turf.Ender wrote:As long as I don't catch flak for it here and get banned for "starting a forum war' I'm up for it.
Don't turn this into a board war.
1) Your Moderator Felis is a liar, plain and simple. I was the one who posted here under troll hater, and I plainly stated I was from SD.net. So his claims about running an IP are just plain false. Especially since if you run an IP check it wouldn't trace back to a site I visit, it will run back to my computer. An obvious attempt to make himself look more computer literate then he is.
2) I find it funny that I was charged with trying to start a forum war by invading when it was your people who went to SD.net. Tell me, did Poland start WW2 by letting them selves be invaded now?
3) The sheer gall of this makes me laugh. Nathan F. is the biggest proponent of this "truce". Yet in the announcements forum, he statesIgnoring the fact that he does not understand how an IP block works, he is the one who insults us, then when this pops up in here saying we should all get along. Now it would be easy to dig up who he was, but the thing here is to see if he has the balls to admit which nick he used. I'm betting it was Trek Representitive, but I'm also betting he won't respond to this.Although I did go over there, I didnt try to stir anything up, and I did not connect us to them in any way, different nick and everything. And im using a firewall with IP blocker on so I doubt with someone with as little IQ as they have would be able to crack it.
God you are all a bunch of fucking hypocrites._Promitto Pacis Supero_, "Let peace rule"
And I now fully expect you spineless and decietful mod will delete this post. That or threaten me with another C&D order (which shows he knows fuck all about the legal system as well if he thinks he can get me for simple post on a message board that is completely truthful).
Nathan F wrote:I would also like to publicly apologize of anything I might have said in the past, as I probably said it while I was mad as a hornet and not thinking clearly.
They sent a herd of Klingons over here in August, got their heads handed to them, decided to retreat and have pretty much left us alone every since. EAS has continued to bash you and this board but bashing doesn't constitute a board war.Darth Wong wrote:They've been conducting a board war for some time;
I don't know about an actual invasion, but pointing out their hypocrisy and sanctimonious bullshit is certainly fair game.Enlightenment wrote:As you said, the right to free speech does not extent to spraypainting slogans on someone elses' garage door. EAS has a right to their (stupid, benighted, paranoid, kookish, take your pick) views and I don't believe we--as a board--should esclate the disagreement by encouraging anything resembling an invasion of their fourms.
