Illuminatus Primus wrote:Come OFF it, Shep. The NIE has said AQ in Pakistan and NWFP is at pre-9/11 strength, and there's been many acknowledgments that if we weren't strained in Iraq, we wouldn't have been pushing off Afghanistan on Canada and allies.
First up; Afghanistan Pre-9/11.
Redrawn from a map by USAID showing where things were before we intervened.
This is things roughly today, to give you an idea of how things are tracking down; e.g. who generally controls what.
Now lets compare that to the ethnic groups in A-Stan:
And not surprisingly Pashtuns were the primary ethnic group represented in the Taliban.....and surprise surprise; the primary level of organization in Pashtun society is the tribe...with 60 major ones and 400 sub-clans.
Unless we decide to kill 50% of all the adult Pashtun males we won't ever really control Afghanistan.
Lets further compare this with where ISAF troops are:
You can see that the troops that are reliable, e.g. can be counted on to fight are deployed in the areas of high taliban/AQ Presence; with us taking the area near Kabul, and the British and Canadians the South. The unreliable units, the ones who sit in their bases at night, not even doing patrols of their perimeter (*cough* Germans *cough*) are in the safe areas.
Adding more troops is easier said than done. We have had to build an entirely new runway at Kabul International Airport, simply to support the 50,000 or so NATO troops in the country; and any real major expansion of troops is going to require significant logistical support from say...Pakistan, like actually letting us use a major port there to ship all the supplies in. That won't be happening for obvious reasons.
But anyway. We actually have 58,800~ "silent" personnel in the country. Of this, 28,600 are in the Afghan National Army, with another 30,200 in the Afghan Police. While they're not exactly high grade material, they are trained to a decent level of standard according to the UK MOD; and really, you don't need SPETZNAZ to control a road most places.