How much did the empire advance

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16450
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Post by Batman »

Um-because planets are, essentially, free what with the bloody things already being there while artificial planetoids cost money? Besides, a couple dozen thousand years of being used to living on planets can do strange things to the way people behave. :)
One wonders why they live on barely habitable backwater shitholes like Tattooine, though. Perhaps however cheap space technology is in the Wars galaxy, it nevertheless is not QUITE cheaper than living in an already existing biosphere (however shitty).
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
Top
User avatar
Omeganian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 547
Joined: 2008-03-08 10:38am
Location: Israel

Post by Omeganian »

There is one simple reason for lack of visible advance in the Republic - lack of centralization. No corporation can put tech support on every planet, so it's forced to build things cheap and reliable, something that doesn't break. People prefer cheap, reliable, time tested designs. No drive for progress - lack of global wars, lack of need for something a lot better, a tolerable, peaceful life. The empire doesn't have those problems, so it does its best to advance.
Q: How are children made in the TNG era Federation?

A: With power couplings. To explain, you shut down the power to the lights, and then, in the darkness, you have the usual TOS era coupling.
Top
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16450
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Post by Batman »

Omeganian wrote:There is one simple reason for lack of visible advance in the Republic - lack of centralization. No corporation can put tech support on every planet, so it's forced to build things cheap and reliable, something that doesn't break. People prefer cheap, reliable, time tested designs. No drive for progress - lack of global wars, lack of need for something a lot better, a tolerable, peaceful life. The empire doesn't have those problems, so it does its best to advance.
The term 'garbage' comes to mind. Yes, military technology has a tendency to advance faster in times of war but there have been plenty of technological advances made in times of peace. Electricity, the steam engine, the internal combustion engine, powered flight, ICs...
As for the lack of centralization, we all know how well the idea of the command economy worked out for the countries using it...
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
Top
User avatar
montypython
Jedi Master
Posts: 1130
Joined: 2004-11-30 03:08am

Post by montypython »

Batman wrote: The term 'garbage' comes to mind. Yes, military technology has a tendency to advance faster in times of war but there have been plenty of technological advances made in times of peace. Electricity, the steam engine, the internal combustion engine, powered flight, ICs...
As for the lack of centralization, we all know how well the idea of the command economy worked out for the countries using it...
Command economies have their efficiencies for given circumstances (e.g, warfighting), much as decentralized ones have theirs (eg., consumer goods), so how effect the different approaches are used can be impacted by the balance of timing and circumstances.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Pure Star Wars”