Astronomy Question !!!!

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
fusion
Jedi Knight
Posts: 608
Joined: 2006-03-28 10:35pm
Location: Capital System, Mid-Childa

Astronomy Question !!!!

Post by fusion »

Yes, I have a question on what is the most accurate measurement of an object that is over 6000 light years away.
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Post by Wyrm »

I'm not sure of the exact distance that can be measured using highly accurate paralax methods, but the HIPPARCOS survey is your best bet here. I believe it's accurate for stars within a few thousand parsecs. It might suit you, given an appropriate definition of "few."

As for other methods, if the star is in a cluster with a standard candle (like a Cephied or an RR Lyrae), that can give you an accurate measure. Less accurate is to find the star's position on the HR diagram and compute its absolute magnitude, and from it, find it's distance using the inverse square law. If the star in question is a standard candle, you've got it made in the shade.
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
User avatar
NetKnight
Youngling
Posts: 132
Joined: 2007-09-19 05:26pm
Location: Purdue University

Post by NetKnight »

It's a special case, but SN1987A is an excelent example of an object definitively older then the Genesis creation myth. The distance measurement itself is quite elegantly arrived at: the distance between the remnant of the star and the gas ring from the supernova event can be measured by contrasting a brightening of the stellar remnant and the reflection of this light from the gas ring, the angular distance between the two is known, and simple trigonometry can thus arrive at the distance, which is ~186,000 LY. It is described quite nicely in this YouTube video.
I wish to propose for the reader's favorable consideration a doctrine which may, I fear, appear wildly paradoxical and subversive. The doctrine in question is this: that it is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true. I must, of course, admit that if such an opinion became common it would completely transform our social life and our political system; since both are at present faultless, this must weigh against it.
-Bertrand Russell

-"Too low they build, who build beneath the stars."
User avatar
fusion
Jedi Knight
Posts: 608
Joined: 2006-03-28 10:35pm
Location: Capital System, Mid-Childa

Post by fusion »

Sorry, I just wanted to know if measurements of within 1% accurate for stellar bodies that are over 6000 light years away
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Post by Wyrm »

For standard candles, only if the standard candle's absolute luminosity can be determined within 1%. As I recall, none are. Cosmic scatter kills this level of detail.

As for the paralax method, only if the paralax shift can be determined better than 1 part in 600000. Which isn't going to happen, not even with HIPPARCOS.
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
User avatar
fusion
Jedi Knight
Posts: 608
Joined: 2006-03-28 10:35pm
Location: Capital System, Mid-Childa

Post by fusion »

Thanks. That sums up my questions...
User avatar
Ariphaos
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1739
Joined: 2005-10-21 02:48am
Location: Twin Cities, MN, USA
Contact:

Post by Ariphaos »

That level of accuracy is available for reflection incidents like SN1987A, however. We know the angular diameter of its gas cloud and the light delay very accurately.
Post Reply