data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c196/5c1967644bd2ad591438c8743be0e7721b888643" alt="Image"
Bush: U.S. supports Ukraine's bid to join NATO
In Kiev, he declares Russia won’t have a say at alliance meeting next week.
updated 3:27 a.m. MT, Tues., April. 1, 2008
KIEV, Ukraine - President Bush said Tuesday he will work "as hard as I can" to help Ukraine join NATO and declared that Russia will not be able to veto former Soviet states joining the transatlantic military alliance.
"Your nation has made a bold decision and the United States strongly supports your request," Bush told Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko after talks at the Presidential Secretariat here.
Bush praised Ukraine's democratic and military reforms, and noted that Ukraine "is the only non-NATO nation supporting every NATO mission."
Ukraine has sent troops to Afghanistan, Kosovo and Iraq. He also portrayed the decision as one that is "in the interests of our organization."
The president's brief visit to Kiev was meant to be a show of support for the country's NATO ambitions ahead of the alliance's summit later this week in Bucharest, Romania.
Ukraine is hoping NATO members will vote to give it a so-called membership action plan, which outlines what a country needs to do to join and is a precursor to a membership invitation. Georgia also wants the same treatment.
"In Bucharest this week, I will continue to make America's position clear: We support MAP for Ukraine and Georgia," Bush said. "My stop here should be a clear signal to everybody that I mean what I say: It's in our interest for Ukraine to join."
Said Yushchenko: "I am sure that we will receive a positive signal in Bucharest and that's the spirit that we are going there with."
Bush and Yushchenko met with reporters in a narrow room with a high ceiling decorated with ornate molding. The two leaders sat at a low credenza behind a wide arrangement of yellow and red roses and other flowers spread along the floor.
Ukraine had long flirted with joining NATO, but it started taking real steps toward meeting the alliance’s military and political standards only after Yushchenko became president in the wake of the 2004 street protests, called the Orange Revolution.
Since then, Ukraine has gained a vibrant opposition, a robust media and has held a series of clean elections. It has also set out to modernize its Soviet-style military, including creating an all-volunteer army and changing troop deployment and training to meet NATO standards. Kiev abandoned customs and practices that date to Soviet and even Czarist Russia times, such as using soldiers for kitchen duty and outfitting them in cumbersome footwear. It also sought to prove itself by deploying troops to Iraq in 2003-2005 and sending peacekeepers to Kosovo and Lebanon.
Remaining problems, however, range from rampant corruption to constant political turmoil, which has caused a stream of government shake-ups and early elections over the past years.
I'd be surprised; really, this would be a poke in the eye of the Russians, and would go a long way towards fueling Russian paranoia (sorry, Stas) about "Western Encroachment/Encirclement". Compared to this, bomber fly-overs of Guam is small potatoes.
People also forget that the Cuban Missile Crisis was actually a reaction to the US placing missiles on Turkish soil, which at the time was right on the Soviet frontier.
OTOH, this would be great for the European Union and NATO-- seriously. As well as the Ukraine. The benefits for both are enormous-- provided that NATO membership eventually dovetails into EU membership as well (not guaranteed, but frequently implied).