[Vote] Title Poll for Brianeyci

[CmdrWilkens]

Allright. There is a motion on the floor and there are several people very clearly in favour some who are clearly oppossed. That said we can continue to hash things out in the discussion thread or we can put the matter to a vote and close it out one way or another.

That being said I would strongly recommend that everyone review the [Discussion] thread, obviously I can't make you but this is probably one of the more contested votes I've yet posted so it is highly encouraged. In advance a reminder this is a Title vote and therefore group B so majority is required plus a quorum of 40% (20 votes). The vote, as always, shall last 7 days.

[Connor MacLeod]

I obviously voted no:

- As Broomstick said basically, it amounts to little more than an impotent gesture, and therefore is meaningless. With him "gone" a ban of some kind would have made more sense, since at least it corrects things. A title he may not even know anythign about corrects nothing.

- As I said, I smell Vendetta. Its rather obvious that some people don't like him. and I don't have any problem with them hating him, or mocking him, or calling him an idiot. I DO have a problem with being used as an instrument of that vendetta. Especially when I have to do a buttload of research just to determine what the fuck he did to begin with.

- As above, I don't feel an adequate job was done of actually proving any of the accusations brought forth about him. Having to dig through that, as well as not understanding what people THOUGHT were his specific violations, made the job more difficult. On that basis, and from what I saw, I see no reason to punish him simply because he's idiotic. Again, as Broomstick said, he doesnt seem malicious.

- We can table the motion on dealing with him for a future date, if he does return. At least hten we have a valid reason for dealing with him.

[phongn]

Voted.

[Ghost Rider]

Voted no.

Honestly, if this was somehow the last camel straw, we should've wrung up Axis Kast long fucking ago. That and as it has been pointed out? He's not here. We could have get rid of his priviliges and really no more effective then doing it to Duchess' account when she wasn't here. What are they going to give a fuck about it at the time. And when they come back, some admin will likely revert it to pre fucked state because the punishment was useless at the future point.

[The Yosemite Bear]

voted!

[K. A. Pital]

Voted no. Other Senators have already detailed the reasons to vote so.

[Stuart Mackey]

Voted

[Simplicius]

Voted no, though I must admit that name-dropping business ticked me off.

[Beowulf]

Voted.

[Sea Skimmer]

No

[Chris OFarrell]

Voted no. Its an empty gesture. Banning him might acomplish something, keeping him from coming back, if thats what the senate wants, but giving him a title he'll never have to wear?

Nah.

[The Duchess of Zeon]

Voted--in favour, as a general expression of my disapproval with his behaviour, though I am not entirely sure if the vote should be held at all (I did not support it at that point), but, with the vote being held anyway, I want him VI'd.

[NecronLord]

Voted no.

[Surlethe]

I have voted.

[Edi]

Voted.

[Grand Admiral Thrawn]

Voted.

[Broomstick]

Voted

[GrandMasterTerwynn]

Voted

[Knife]

I found my self convinced by Connors argument.


SPQSDN

[Coyote]

El-Abstaino-vote-o. Explanation in the [Discussion] thread re. m'sieu braineyci...

[seanrobertson]

I found my self convinced by Connors argument.

As did I. Voted "no."

[Publius]

Present.

[Lord Poe]

Voted no. This is a moderator issue.

[Kuja]

*taps the butt of his pen against his desk for a few minutes, looking at the ballot box before finally rendering his vote*

[Admiral Valdemar]

Voted for glory.