You're still missing the point. Magic exists in Middle Earth. It works. However, it is not omnipotent, and I have noticed that everyone is automatically assuming it is omnipotent. Even magic has limits; for example, a more powerful wizard can overpower a weaker wizard. It is self-evident that if there are different limits of power, then there are obviously limits.Gil Hamilton wrote:Of course forging means the same thing, but your theory is not consistant with the creation of the Ring of Power. It was forged by Sauron, and after he got done forging it, he dumped the bulk of his power into it,given it it's invulnerablity and special powers. It's not because the ring has a significantly higher specific heat. It's still gold, it's just gold that happens it to contain a hell of alot of magic, making it static. This was stated in the trilogy. When I get home, if you wish, I will dig through the book and find the appropriate passage.
How does that quote contradict me? It only indicates that it was simply a matter of being "hot enough", which actually confirms everything I've been saying. None of the dragons of old had dragonfire that was "hot enough", but since it's clearly stated to be a simple matter of being "hot enough", and we technologically advanced people can generate heat greater than anything on Earth (including its core) or even the Sun, "hot enough" is definitely right down our alley.Yet the very quote you use contradicts you. "...But there is no smith's forge in this Shire that could change it at all. Not even the anvils and furnaces of the Dwarves could do that. It has been said that dragon-fire could melt and consume the Rings of Power, but there is not now any dragon left on earth in which the old fire is hot enough; nor was there ever any dragon, not even Ancalagon the Black, who could have harmed the One Ring, the Ruling Ring, for that was made by Sauron himself."
Strawman. Read more carefully. I am saying that magic works, and that technology works also. I'm also pointing out that both must have limits. Sauron is more powerful than any other magic user. This fact alone is proof that magic has a magnitude, if you will, which in turn means that it has limits. There are physical phenomena (in the case of Mount Doom, natural phenomena which are distinguished only by being "hot enough") which can undo magic. What more proof do you need?No doubt, but magic must still work as well. Part of that magic is the legend that the One Ring can only be unmade at Orodruin. Unless, of course, you are claiming that technology works in full but magic does not.
Then it is not canon. JRR Tolkien never intended it to be published. It is like production storyboards or behind-the-scenes material.Absolutely correct. The Silmarillion was never for entertainment value. What the Silmarillion is is JRR Tolkiens notes that he prepared before he wrote the Lord of the Rings in order to make sure that the history of Middle Earth was completely consistant. His grandson, I believe, editted and published it,
Doesn't that line contradict itself? If mortal men can learn such things, then they are not intrinsic to wizards.Not true. They have such magic ability because they are Maiar and mortal men were not magic creatures, though they could learn things, such as Grima Wormtounge did.
Through sheer strength of will and determination, since magic was not made available to them.Men had other strengths and in the end, dominated Middle Earth.
Hearsay.Oddly enough, in his letters, JRR Tolkien hints that Pallando and Alatar actually founded magic schools in the east.
Ah, so Saruman (the "evil" one) gave some of the magic to mortal men, while Gandalf (the "good" one) witheld magic and tried to conceal his abilities from others? This actually strengthens my suspicions about the wizards and their preferred "caste structure" approach to the races, doesn't it? Like the Biblical snake, the "bad guy" is the one who gives knowledge away to mortals, hence the preferred interpretation is clearly biased by the "father knows best" ethos I have been referring to.What about the rest? Radagast didn't hang out with Men. Saruman did teach people some of his magic. Gandalf never stayed for too long in a place without good reason, and tried not to make out just how powerful he was to the local population. As far as most people knew Gandalf was just a really wise old man that was handy with parlor tricks and had aways been around.
Then why not give it to them, since they would find it useful, they're supposed to be fighting on the same side, and you have noted yourself that at least some of it could be given to them?Anyway, you are partially right. The Istari (except for possibly Saruman) never looked down their noses at men, but the Elves did. Tolkien frequently pointed to that when he wrote the story. The Elves were first class snobs. This wasn't true of the Istari though, which is the main point. Nothing in the story indicates at all that they thought Men could not handle magic.
Precisely. There were many serious problems with the Old Republic Jedi. They brought their own destruction down upon themselves, and they deserved it. However, there was no racial caste structure; Jedi can come from any species.Perhaps we should not take George Lucas' preferred view of Jedi and instead of considering them protectors and peacekeepers, but elitist snobs who travel around butting their noses into things that aren't their business because they can and don't try to instill Jedi training the the general population because of inherent weakness as well.