Ender wrote:Illuminatus Primus wrote:
Did it prevent him from reconquering the entire galaxy in short order? No. The harm or benefit of an action must be assessed from its consequences and outcome. The outcome of having Thrawn assassinated and the Imperial Civil War was that Operation SHADOWHAND successfully reincorporated virtually all of the galaxy into the Galactic Empire perhaps short of scatterings throughout the Outer Rim and perhaps much of the Expansion Region.
No. Comparing the New Republic after it fled Coruscant to a guerrilla movement is flawed as they were still able to fight a conventional war on a galactic level. They are more comparable to the Confederacy of Independent Systems who could fight on equal footing but were forced to move their high command from place to place. More importantly, just because you dodged disaster does not make what took place acceptable. You judge things on their potential and process as well as their outcome because those impact strategic readiness as well.
The fact is that I said they were on the
verge of disintegrating entirely and degrading back to a pre-Endor footing; the fact that the New Republic controlled any territory is not even attested, merely inferred from the fact that the Empire is not stated to control the Expansion Region and I believe they are only stated to have recaptured some or much of the Outer Rim. The New Republic had just a year and a half earlier held three quarters of the galaxy and essentially all of the Core Worlds; it was reduced now tenuously to regions of the fringe, and the Empire had seized territory completely enveloping their scattered holdings (the Empire controls much of the Outer Rim, essentially all of the Mid Rim, Inner Rim, and Wild Space, thereby controlling all territory around what of the Outer Rim the Rebels had left, and the regions surrounding the Expansion Region from all sides). The Empire has the strategic initiative, the campaign momentum, is successfully thwarting New Republic sieges and counterattacks, and controls all of the high population, high prestige, industrial and resource concentrations in the galaxy. It has strategic weapons the New Republic as of yet cannot respond to or defend against - it is incapable of defense in depth. The New Republic is stymied by the logistical and command and communications obstacles by being unable to operate from a formal capital, and must rely instead on ad hoc command posts and central communications hubs aboard lone cruisers in deep space.
Ender wrote:Had he not gone through with the Imperial Civil War the Republic potentially would not not have had the military upper hand - a rather damning indictment as the balance of forces plays a key role in limiting strategic options.
Pure supposition. You have no idea what the relative balance of forces on either side of the Imperial Civil War was. Furthermore, in actual cost of the Imperial Civil War is unknown. The major impact of the Imperial Civil War according to available sources was that it traumatized and inflicted collateral damage to the Core Worlds. This hurts the New Republic's prestige - when it comes down to it, the New Republic is sanctimonious and claims to be the better power, but when they're unable or unwilling to help and the Empire is winning, the public is more likely to just sue for peace. The Empire has credibility when it comes to blood and iron, not the New Republic. For all we know, in terms of actual cost in blood to the Empire's war machine, it was quite limited, and its major purpose was to just eliminate those few parties to the Imperial reunification that Palpatine considered to be risks and incompatible with his war aims and plans. The Empire previously had not lost any war or campaign to the New Republic due to their talent and expertise - but they were vulnerable to fifth columns and mutiny. So he prudently cleans house before the final phase begins.
Ender wrote:Thrawn's assassination has debatable strategic value as the resulting retreat let the Republic overextend itself permitting the conquest at the expense of the disruption of a coordinated war machine (this question hinges on the extent of the infrastructure in the deep core whih is unknown), but the Imperil Civil War is inexcusable.
The example of Thrawn was probably intentional. Palpatine clearly identified opponents and credible alternatives
within the Imperial system as much more dangerous to his return than the New Republic, which was congenitally defective and weak. The
Dark Side Sourcebook claims that "Thrawn should have known better" and Palpatine "was disappointed." It stands to reason that Thrawn may have known about Palpatine's contingencies for his incapacitation, or at the very least was given explicit instructions to obey his existing commands no matter what. Given that Palpatine is rebuilding a coalition and harmonizing disparate components of his former Empire - from rogue warlords and derived states, to the Empire "proper" of Isard, Dangor and Thrawn. The fact his instructions must be obeyed in detail would certainly be rammed home to those he had submitted to tests of loyalty would be definitely reinforced if he was willing to orchestrate the death of his favorite for disobedience. Furthermore, it also precipitates the first phase of the reclamation, as you point out.
Ender wrote:It is on par with Nero ordering the repeated decimation of his guard when they failed after he ordered them to fight the sea. It devastated public relations,
So what? The public does not expect anything of the Empire when it comes to tests of fire; they do expect something of the New Republic. This weighs heavily against them. Furthermore, the decimation may have been only superficially random. Perhaps the ICW factions, being controlled behind the scenes by Palpatine, selectively targeted collaborators and sapient resources particular to the Republic.
Ender wrote:demolished much of the gained territory (negating its strategic worth),
We don't know that; in fact the limited destruction of Metellos (mere billions of a full-scale ecumenopolis) suggests otherwise. Rather, the ICW and initial campaign restored the Core Worlds to the Empire, returning to them the political prestige, industrial centers, and resource hubs, while denying the main support base to the New Republic. The limited destruction drove away evacuees while it avoided wholesale slaughter. The net effect is to burden to already reeling New Republic with a massive region-scale refugee crisis.
Ender wrote:destroyed much of his state security apparatus and intelligence cycle,
We don't know how many agents from either side of ISB and II were proscribed. And if the relations between Imperial Intelligence and Palpatine remained strong, I suspect that perhaps the proscription was not as random as it might have seemed, but a deliberate move to make an example of the disobedient and remove fifth-columnists or extremists who would not comply with his program.
Ender wrote:it brought about more fortress worlds which weaken the economy,
Several possibilities here, the strategy could have called for hardpoints where industrial equipment and supplies could be concentrated and defended in depth, instead of attempting to defend the entire region as a whole. Though I thought this was wasteful as well.
Ender wrote:morale would have evaporated, and it weakened his armed forces (increasing the advantage of New Republic at the same time).
We don't know how major the losses were. This is supposition.
Ender wrote:The last bit is the most criminally reckless behavior as the entire basis of Shadowhand was overwhelming force. Not behind the scenes manipulations like in his first rise to power, no brilliant strategic maneuvers like Thrawn demonstrated, no 4th column movements or economic domination like Isard and Zsinnj tried - he just hit them with wave after wave of ships, men, and material. The simplicity of his plans means he needed everything he could get.
I disagree. Since it was a battle against an opponent with a superficial "military upper hand" - whatever that means, its just as possible that the New Republic intelligence apparatus poorly judged the balance of power or remained ignorant - which is highly probably considering the entire basis for Palpatine's resurgence were fantastic intelligence coups (hiding his enclaves, hiding the cooperation of the warlords and the ERC behind the scenes, reorienting the Empire's forces from Thrawn's front lines to staging areas in the Deep Core which the New Republic failed to notice even existed). Rather, it was a highly-effective blitzkrieg which totally overwhelmed the New Republic whose doctrine was simply unprepared for or incapable of waging total war. They had done asymmetrical war as the ARR fine, they did warlord neutralizing fine, but they're practice in total conventional war leaves much to be desired. Even the last campaign against Isard was a rather limited operation, and she actually deliberately gave them Coruscant, and the rest of the Core fell due to disorganization and political coup. The true genius of the contingency plans is they intentionally sabotaged the Empire to produce a Republic which had not been tested by fire and was not well-disciplined, a premature and deformed birth, if you will. Furthermore, the Dark Empire Sourcebook reveals that the Empire DID have plentiful fifth columnists riddling the bureaucracy of the New Republic. If anyone had access to them, Palpatine did.
Thrawn's "strategy" leaves much to be desired. He risked himself personally on the front, micromanaged individual operations' detailed planning by other operational commanders, and apparently did all the strategic planning in his head, so that after he died High Command could not due shit (thankfully, Palpatine did have a plan, and it did function swimmingly even when he was dead or unavailable or not publicly acknowledged). Most of his secret weapons were mostly psychological in value as their output was quite limited; the fact the New Republic was so vulnerable to these sleights-of-hand by a decisively inferior foe in strategic terms only underlines how the plans by Palpatine did not exactly have to toil uphill much against resistance. Isard's wrecking and left the New Republic fully dysfunctional and untested by genuine total war.
Ender wrote:More to the point, he let it go on in the middle of the campaign. The Imperial Civil War wasn't between the death of Thrawn and the return of Palpatine, and it wasn't after they reconquered everything. They took the core and fighting there broke out while he was still advancing into the rim. We see mas demonstrating this and Mon Cal was under siege.
The ICW broke out briefly and ended more or less immediately after Skywalker was captured on Coruscant. It was another feint and plot - very Clone War esque - of Palpatine's. By the assault on Mon Cal, the Empire had already reformed a unified front.
Ender wrote:Not only were they fighting on thousands of fronts across space, but the now on millions of worlds they already had. Even worse it is tying up supplies as the geography of the galaxy is resulting in them spreading themselves thin.
No, the Dark Empire Sourcebook quite clearly states the New Republic sat out the ICW, leaving the Empire to its own devices aside from little false-flag raids like the one by Skywalker's and Calrissian's Star Destroyer. They waited until the Empire reattacked following the re-reunification to resume general war stance, and ceded the strategic initiative to the Empire. I don't blame them so much, the Empire had stripped them of their tax base, their factories, their stores, their bases, and much of their bureaucracy and command apparatus. They were also politically humiliated, bloodied, and burdened by a region-scale refugee crisis.
Ender wrote:The Imperial Civil War strikes me as evidence that Droga was not the only one driven mad by his and Palpatine's "special time" together. He thought it was a fine tool that strengthened his forces by purging the weak, but in reality Operation Shadowhand succeeded in spite of the Imperial Civil War, not because of it.
I am not like most people on this forum, I think we go for "the characters are stupid/incompetent/crazy/bullshitting" too quickly as an explanation. I try to give the story's basic plot and intent the benefit of a doubt when trying to come up with a comprehensive explanation and harmonizing of all sources. Palpatine was, in my opinion, the same Palpatine he was in ROTS and ROTJ in DE, though in DE2 and especially EE I think he's started to degrade.