Alright, but I take some issue with this:
Two, your first edit after being told to stop insulting people was to insult someone.
How did I insult someone? In the edit summary, I didn't mention any names. I only mentioned the "inquisitor"'s name after Graestan posted. I also made a legitimate complaint, which was that he had used a bad example for something that needed "improvement". How can you source a paragraph that already has a source? That might have been sloppy, but I interpreted it as intentional, and remarked on it for being childish, in an edit summary after doing a legitimate enhancing of that part of the article. That in turn might have been extreme, but the particular user has come across as snidey in other issues that had nothing to do with me.
Heh, I meant this word:
Adj. 1. snide - expressive of contempt; "curled his lip in a supercilious smile"; "spoke in a sneering jeering manner"; "makes many a sharp comparison but never a mean or snide one"
Secondly, I thought Graestan had actually given McE some support earlier on (including a post he later erased from the site), sorry if that wasn't the case. My initial dislike of him began when, after having apologized to Grand Moff Ganner and taken his advice, resolving the issue, he lashed out at me despite having nothing to do with the preceding arguments.
Sorry for giving others a bad name, I'll keep my usual low editing profile from now on. My only concern is the complete disregard for facts shown later on the same day, when Lord Hydronium deleted every single reference to the (badly named) Imperial-class Super Star Destroyer, which was actually used for both the Allegiance and Eclipse's escorts in the Dark Empire audio book. I assume he did this not knowing what the dialog was, which I can add to the bts section of that article. The problem now is, a canon name was exchanged for a fanon one, the provisional "Allegiance type".
