Nice, good old Stormont getting some ink


another great chapter, bravo Stuart

Moderator: LadyTevar
Thanks. The tug is probably single-engined in real life, but I took some artistic license there. Not as fun as the battles I know, but I think the destruction of a major city deserves a fair amount of attention if it's going to seem real (there's one brief scene there left to go). I'm afraid the Detroit timeline is trailing behind a bit due to me being late submitting; Stuart did a good job of fixing up the demon scene to not be retrospective.Burak Gazan wrote:Nice, good old Stormont getting some inkNow, if only the JW Westcott mailboat was in there
Atlantic Underwater Test and Evaluation Centre.Also, what's AUTEC stand for?
There anything in particular preventing us from naming them after 19th century Presidents? Andy Jackson, for example.R011 wrote:Part 65
“The Lyndon Johnson and Herbert Hoover?"
A nice comment on current American CVN naming conventions. If they continue naming them for politicians, they'll eventually get names like those. I see Nixon is still pariah enough that you had to go to the second (or third) worst regarded Republican in the last century instead lest you go over the top.
Although this time it would be 'girl with the wings, five rounds rapid'.JN1 wrote:famous order 'five rounds rapid!'
No idea; couldn't find that much info on it online. Here's a photo of it though;Is the Stormont named after the castle and location of Northern Ireland's legislative assembly?
Here's another one of mine that didn't make the cut, either for being too boring, because the character count was already getting out of hand, or because there was already too much 'padding' between the Sheffield and Detroit strikes.Nice work, btw and I do like that deleted scene.
Just so long as you don't include that deleted scene.Stuart wrote:I think we're going to have to do an Armageddon Blooper Thread. Completed with deleted scenes
That was rather the point - I was having a jab at the current convention of naming carriers after Presidents. I was thinking of the Millard Fillmore and Calvin Coolidge but that would be over-egging the pudding.Sidewinder wrote:Good chapter, but of all the dead presidents to become namesakes of aircraft carriers, why pick Lyndon B. Johnson, one of two people (the other being McNamara) whose stupidity guaranteed the US will NOT win the Vietnam War? Hell, even Benedict Arnold is a more worthy namesake than that cocksucker!
I personally favor the USS James Buchanan or the USS Rutherford Hayes - or better yet, the USS William Henry Harrison.Stuart wrote:That was rather the point - I was having a jab at the current convention of naming carriers after Presidents. I was thinking of the Millard Fillmore and Calvin Coolidge but that would be over-egging the pudding.Sidewinder wrote:Good chapter, but of all the dead presidents to become namesakes of aircraft carriers, why pick Lyndon B. Johnson, one of two people (the other being McNamara) whose stupidity guaranteed the US will NOT win the Vietnam War? Hell, even Benedict Arnold is a more worthy namesake than that cocksucker!
No Franklin D Roosevelt?Stuart wrote:That was rather the point - I was having a jab at the current convention of naming carriers after Presidents. I was thinking of the Millard Fillmore and Calvin Coolidge but that would be over-egging the pudding.
Uhm, the Roosevelt CVN today refers to Theodore Roosevelt; not FDR. The FDR was a Midway which retired long ago.R011 wrote:He already had one[/i]
A term used to refer to two groups in the same side fighting or coming in conflict over who gets to do what. The British aren't just going to save the PFHL, they're going to take over, thereby infringing in America's "turf" because it's their operation. The reason the Brits are doing it is the same thing that motivates all turf wars, they want all the credit.Stas Bush wrote:"Turf wars"?