Hydrogen and the Honda "Clarity"

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Ugh, the Hydrogen 7 is something of a running joke for alternative fuelled cars after the Prius and its not-so-ecological manufacturing. It's ballsy to go and develop a car that uses hydrogen in the good ol' burning method, defying those going the fuel-cell route, but it doesn't really add practicality other than a tuned up engine that can run normal liquid fuels through it too.

If hydrogen is to be used, I'd rather it was in fuel-cells and with metallic storage media, rather than cryo-hydrogen tanks under pressure.
User avatar
Sikon
Jedi Knight
Posts: 705
Joined: 2006-10-08 01:22am

Post by Sikon »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Ugh, the Hydrogen 7 is something of a running joke for alternative fuelled cars after the Prius and its not-so-ecological manufacturing. It's ballsy to go and develop a car that uses hydrogen in the good ol' burning method, defying those going the fuel-cell route, but it doesn't really add practicality other than a tuned up engine that can run normal liquid fuels through it too.
Here's the difference:
The latest BMW hydrogen car is the 745h, which uses a 4.4-litre V-8. The only major modifications to make the big BMW's engine run on hydrogen involve the intake ports, which have additional injector valves for hydrogen. The engines come off the same production line as other BMW powerplants and are installed in the vehicle using the same assembly techniques.
... corresponds to relatively comparable cost to the engines of regular gasoline vehicles of today.

But fuel cell costs such as this example from the Honda Clarity article linked in the opening post of this thread are vastly different:
It costs $500,000 to make each one
From here

Saving hundreds of thousands of dollars by not having a fuel cell is the added practicality now and up until such a time (if ever) that fuel cells become vastly less expensive than today.
Image
[/url]
Image
[/url]Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot live in the cradle forever.

― Konstantin Tsiolkovsky
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Which is precisely why I suggest ammonia instead. The sourcing and storing of this material is a piece of piss next to hydrogen, even if the end result is a fuel-cell utilising the same electro-chemistry.
And it will keep everyone's sinuses clear!
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
FireNexus
Cookie
Posts: 2131
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:10am

Post by FireNexus »

Of course, to get that benefit we have to smell ammonia all the time. I'd rather have clogged sinuses.
I had a Bill Maher quote here. But fuck him for his white privelegy "joke".

All the rest? Too long.
User avatar
Stile
Jedi Knight
Posts: 654
Joined: 2006-01-02 06:22pm
Location: Badger Central
Contact:

Post by Stile »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Which is precisely why I suggest ammonia instead. The sourcing and storing of this material is a piece of piss next to hydrogen, even if the end result is a fuel-cell utilising the same electro-chemistry.
Also ammonia is a major byproduct of animal farming. We could use the byproducts and offset fossil fuel dependency.
Image
Post Reply