Italy is still Western Europe's armpit.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Elfdart wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:If the group is concealing lawbreakers, why not?
Because collective punishment is so Third Reich.
I guess it was bad to go after the Mafia, then.
I also love the way people on this board are more upset over littering and petty theft than they are by racist government policies and bigoted shit stains who attack people with molotovs.
Did anyone say that molotov atacks were OK?

Nice dodge.
How is it a dodge? You made a completely groundless accusation. Nobody said the molotov attacks were OK. That's a strawman fallacy on your part, and no one should have to defend a position that they didn't take in the first place.
I would think that arson would take priority over small-time theft and littering as a better use of police manpower. I see there's no call for having homegrown Italian thugs fingerprinted based on real acts of violence, nor is there any call for the state to step in and tell them how to live. No, that kind of horseshit is reserved for a detested minority.
Bullshit. If you look at my posting history, you will see that I have never had any problems with widespread fingerprinting or even DNA sampling. It is hardly an exception I am making for this particular case.
As for finger-printing, police need ways of tracking people down. For most of us, they have addresses, and various other forms of ID. For people who attempt to evade most of that system, I see nothing unreasonable about pursuing some other way of making them trackable, like fingerprinting.
Yeah, I'd sleep better at night knowing the police were going to use fingerprints to track down people for littering:
I would have no problem with that. Frankly, I would have no problem with every man, woman and child in the entire country being fingerprinted. Hell, AFAIK everyone who ever joined the military or the police was fingerprinted. It's not a horrendous human-rights violation.
"This is an all points bulletin! Calling all cars! a couple of Gypsies left a park without putting their empty bottles in a trash can! Be on the lookout for these dangerous, ruthless criminals!"

:wanker:
Omigod, somebody might <gasp> take a fingerprint! Run for the hills! It's the end of the world!
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10714
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Post by Elfdart »

Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:
Elfdart wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: If the group is concealing lawbreakers, why not?
Because collective punishment is so Third Reich.
You do realise that some countries have laws that state that accomplices are also liable to be getting charged in court for aiding and abetting with criminals? How is that collective punishment then?
In that case, the accomplice has in fact broken the law. But unless they have real evidence that someone is plotting to commit a crime or harbor fugitives, they have no business hassling people for the "crime" of being related to a suspect or being in the same ethnic group as the suspect.

Darth Wong wrote: I guess it was bad to go after the Mafia, then.
When did the authorities go after mobsters' family members who were not involved in crime? This fingerprint campaign is for all Gypsies, whether they commit crimes or not.
How is it a dodge? You made a completely groundless accusation. Nobody said the molotov attacks were OK.
Where did I say they thought it was OK? I said people seemed more bent out of shape over petty crime by Gypsies than violent crime by anti-Roma bigots.
That's a strawman fallacy on my part, and no one should have to defend a position that they didn't take in the first place.
You stand corrected.
Bullshit. If you look at my posting history, you will see that I have never had any problems with widespread fingerprinting or even DNA sampling. It is hardly an exception I am making for this particular case.
This isn't widespread fingerprinting, it's targeted on one ethnic group.

I would have no problem with that. Frankly, I would have no problem with every man, woman and child in the entire country being fingerprinted. Hell, AFAIK everyone who ever joined the military or the police was fingerprinted. It's not a horrendous human-rights violation.
That's because it applies to everyone. If the Air Force decided to take DNA samples for ID purposes, but only from black recruits and based on the myth of black men plotting to rape white women, I'd say the people behind such a proposal are racist twats -even more so if it's part of a wave of national hysteria over race-mixing.
User avatar
Netko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: 2005-03-30 06:14am

Post by Netko »

Elfdart wrote:In that case, the accomplice has in fact broken the law. But unless they have real evidence that someone is plotting to commit a crime or harbor fugitives, they have no business hassling people for the "crime" of being related to a suspect or being in the same ethnic group as the suspect.
Please point out where the Italian plan there is a plan to "hassle" people beyond forcing them to get fingerprinted for ID documents, something that is already, shock horror, mandatory for every adult Italian citizen. More on that below.
How is it a dodge? You made a completely groundless accusation. Nobody said the molotov attacks were OK.
Where did I say they thought it was OK? I said people seemed more bent out of shape over petty crime by Gypsies than violent crime by anti-Roma bigots.
The problem is that the current NGO approaches simply aren't working (see the Economist article), the previous communist attempts at treating them like everyone else didn't work, so at this point something new, likely more intrusive is required. Yes, the Italian plan has many failings, beginning from its origins in a false security scare, however the plan itself, as far as I've been able to see (enforcing some minimal expected cultural norms, like not begging, sending kids to school, etc.) doesn't get much hate from me.

Compared to the Italian plan, there are far better targets for you to show anti-Roma bias, like the actions of the Slovenian authorities a year or two back when a village wanted to chase away a Roma family from their village and the authorities essentially assisted them.

And, frankly, claiming that the Roma should be left alone because they only cause petty crimes is morally dubious. What about their children? Did you read the accounts in the Economist article and my own? Kids who could be getting higher education, who want to get higher education, and who would be among the most productive members of society are forced by their families to instead work as beggars (sometimes including mutilation for better effectiveness) and scrap scavengers. But that is their culture, so the state has no authority to go in and help those kids out? Fuck you. I don't see you claiming that in the threads involving the wacky polygamist cults and similar shit.
Bullshit. If you look at my posting history, you will see that I have never had any problems with widespread fingerprinting or even DNA sampling. It is hardly an exception I am making for this particular case.
This isn't widespread fingerprinting, it's targeted on one ethnic group.
Except Italy already implements fingerprinting of their entire adult population when they get an identity card - which is mandatory for adults. So the only difference with the Roma (besides them not being allowed to evade the system that everyone else follows) is the fingerprinting of children - which, considering the intended purpose (stop begging and force school attendance) I don't really have a major problem with.
I would have no problem with that. Frankly, I would have no problem with every man, woman and child in the entire country being fingerprinted. Hell, AFAIK everyone who ever joined the military or the police was fingerprinted. It's not a horrendous human-rights violation.
That's because it applies to everyone. If the Air Force decided to take DNA samples for ID purposes, but only from black recruits and based on the myth of black men plotting to rape white women, I'd say the people behind such a proposal are racist twats -even more so if it's part of a wave of national hysteria over race-mixing.
See above - it actually does apply to everyone. Plus, with the Roma, while there are obviously plenty of "classical" racists, most people actually have anti-Roma bias based on stereotypes they really do perpetrate - mass begging, child exploitation etc.
User avatar
Melchior
Jedi Master
Posts: 1061
Joined: 2005-01-13 10:46am

Post by Melchior »

Elfdart wrote: When did the authorities go after mobsters' family members who were not involved in crime? This fingerprint campaign is for all Gypsies, whether they commit crimes or not.
In Italy authorities generally avoid going after mobsters tout court. The most offensive part of the whole thing is that Italy has a real security emergency, and has been having one for decades: the most powerful criminal organizations in the western world, with extensive political connection and a hand in every conceivable mean of criminal profit, from racketing to waste mismanagement (and weapon smuggling, and prostitution, and drugs, etc.). Entire areas of the country are in practice controlled by a state-within-the-state, and a criminal one at that. Every crime-fighting resource should be directed at this enormous, unacceptable problem, but governments (especially this one) prefer to bolster irrational moral panics in order to appease the most unsavoury parts of the electorate with fascist measures while retaining their ties with the criminal organizations.
User avatar
Melchior
Jedi Master
Posts: 1061
Joined: 2005-01-13 10:46am

Post by Melchior »

Netko wrote: Except Italy already implements fingerprinting of their entire adult population when they get an identity card - which is mandatory for adults. So the only difference with the Roma (besides them not being allowed to evade the system that everyone else follows) is the fingerprinting of children - which, considering the intended purpose (stop begging and force school attendance) I don't really have a major problem with.
This is entirely false. I'm Italian, I have an Italian identity card and nobody ever took my fingerprints. I would have no objection to a general measure that mandated taking them, but this measure does not exist.
User avatar
Netko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: 2005-03-30 06:14am

Post by Netko »

Seriously? I realize that the old "cards" (booklets) didn't have it, but supposedly the new electronic ones have them as part of the biometric package (photo and encoded fingerprint). Or am I missing something?
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

Netko wrote:Seriously? I realize that the old "cards" (booklets) didn't have it, but supposedly the new electronic ones have them as part of the biometric package (photo and encoded fingerprint). Or am I missing something?
Are the new ID cards mandatory for everyone? I suspect they are not, if their legislation is in line with most other European countries.

AFAIK (though I could be wrong), in most places ID cards are optional, but if you do get one, it may have some form of biometric identification (not everywhere, though), generally fingerprints.
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
Colonel Olrik
The Spaminator
Posts: 6121
Joined: 2002-08-26 06:54pm
Location: Munich, Germany

Post by Colonel Olrik »

Edi wrote: AFAIK (though I could be wrong), in most places ID cards are optional, but if you do get one, it may have some form of biometric identification (not everywhere, though), generally fingerprints.
I'm sure that in Germany, Greece, Spain and Portugal they're mandatory. In all cases there's biometric identification, the Spanish and Portuguese ID cards have the fingerprint.
User avatar
ShadowRider77
Youngling
Posts: 54
Joined: 2008-03-17 11:44am
Location: Milan, Italy

Post by ShadowRider77 »

On the old Italian ID cards, the 'booklet' ones, had a space for the fingerprint, but it was not required, and in fact neither I nor nobody I know who got their ID cards in the same years of me had their fingerprint taken.

I eventually had my fingerprints (all of them if I remember correctly) taken, when I did the medical visits for draft enlistement (they were referred to as "the Three Days", even if when it was my turn it took just a day...). Since all male Italians who turned 18 within 2001 (I don't know exactly the timing...) had to do the Three Days, I think it is safe to assume that all these people's fingerprints are already in possession of Italian government in some way.

My fingerprints (again all of them if I remember correctly) were taken again later when I was enlisted.

The new ID card, the 'credit card' type, prevides mandatorily the scan of one fingerprint (left index finger), so all Italian citizens who requested or renewed their ID cards since its introduction had their fingerprint scanned and stored.
"They say that rain are God's tears that He sheds on mankind. But I think that God, if he indeed exists and is not just a delusional fantasy we conjure because we can't make a sense to our lives, if He exists He does not care enough to cry on us. So, if this water comes from Him, it's not His tears."
User avatar
ShadowRider77
Youngling
Posts: 54
Joined: 2008-03-17 11:44am
Location: Milan, Italy

Post by ShadowRider77 »

Hm, messed up the first phrase. Had it coming for writing in haste. I rewrite it:

"The old Italian ID cards, the 'booklet' ones, had a space for a fingerprint, but it was not required and neither I nor anyone I know who has the old ID had the fingerprint taken."

Sorry for the mistake... :oops:
"They say that rain are God's tears that He sheds on mankind. But I think that God, if he indeed exists and is not just a delusional fantasy we conjure because we can't make a sense to our lives, if He exists He does not care enough to cry on us. So, if this water comes from Him, it's not His tears."
User avatar
Dahak
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7292
Joined: 2002-10-29 12:08pm
Location: Admiralty House, Landing, Manticore
Contact:

Post by Dahak »

Colonel Olrik wrote:
Edi wrote: AFAIK (though I could be wrong), in most places ID cards are optional, but if you do get one, it may have some form of biometric identification (not everywhere, though), generally fingerprints.
I'm sure that in Germany, Greece, Spain and Portugal they're mandatory. In all cases there's biometric identification, the Spanish and Portuguese ID cards have the fingerprint.
The current decision made between the justice minister and the home secretary in Germany is that the fingerprints in ID cards and passports are voluntary.
Image
Great Dolphin Conspiracy - Chatter box
"Implications: we have been intercepted deliberately by a means unknown, for a purpose unknown, and transferred to a place unknown by a form of intelligence unknown. Apart from the unknown, everything is obvious." ZORAC
GALE Force Euro Wimp
Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority.
Image
User avatar
Melchior
Jedi Master
Posts: 1061
Joined: 2005-01-13 10:46am

Post by Melchior »

The identity card is mandatory, in Italy. I turned eighteen after the end of the draft, but obtained my document before the introduction of the newer, electronic one, so my fingerprints were never taken. I'm not sure if they are actually required for the periodical renewing, but I don't think so.
User avatar
ShadowRider77
Youngling
Posts: 54
Joined: 2008-03-17 11:44am
Location: Milan, Italy

Post by ShadowRider77 »

Melchior wrote:The identity card is mandatory, in Italy. I turned eighteen after the end of the draft, but obtained my document before the introduction of the newer, electronic one, so my fingerprints were never taken. I'm not sure if they are actually required for the periodical renewing, but I don't think so.
Some friends of mine who renewed their IDs had their fingerprint taken, and since it is mandatory for the new IDs I assumed it was so also for the renewals...but, after reading your post, I tried a quick search and found inconclusive informations (there are some conspiracist bloggers claiming that they purposefully aren't renewing their IDs because of the 'mandatory fingerprint scan', but I didn't find anything official on this regard...), so I'm not so sure myself anymore. I'll try to find something more precise...
"They say that rain are God's tears that He sheds on mankind. But I think that God, if he indeed exists and is not just a delusional fantasy we conjure because we can't make a sense to our lives, if He exists He does not care enough to cry on us. So, if this water comes from Him, it's not His tears."
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Elfdart wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:I guess it was bad to go after the Mafia, then.
When did the authorities go after mobsters' family members who were not involved in crime? This fingerprint campaign is for all Gypsies, whether they commit crimes or not.
Fingerprinting is not "going after". It is monitoring, which the authorities did do for the mobsters' families and acquaintances.
How is it a dodge? You made a completely groundless accusation. Nobody said the molotov attacks were OK.
Where did I say they thought it was OK? I said people seemed more bent out of shape over petty crime by Gypsies than violent crime by anti-Roma bigots.
That's a strawman fallacy on my part, and no one should have to defend a position that they didn't take in the first place.
You stand corrected.
Wow. The difference between "have less of a problem with" and "think it's OK" might strike you as some grand triumph, but it really isn't. The fact remains that you accused people of thinking molotov attacks aren't so bad.
Bullshit. If you look at my posting history, you will see that I have never had any problems with widespread fingerprinting or even DNA sampling. It is hardly an exception I am making for this particular case.
This isn't widespread fingerprinting, it's targeted on one ethnic group.
It's targeted on behaviour, not ethnicity. I hate to break the news to you, but all laws target behaviour.
I would have no problem with that. Frankly, I would have no problem with every man, woman and child in the entire country being fingerprinted. Hell, AFAIK everyone who ever joined the military or the police was fingerprinted. It's not a horrendous human-rights violation.
That's because it applies to everyone. If the Air Force decided to take DNA samples for ID purposes, but only from black recruits and based on the myth of black men plotting to rape white women, I'd say the people behind such a proposal are racist twats -even more so if it's part of a wave of national hysteria over race-mixing.
Apples and oranges. Fingerprinting of military recruits is also targeting a certain behaviour, ie- people who sign up for the military. If it was ethnically based, then it would apply regardless of whether these Roma have nomadic lifestyles or fixed addresses. If there was a large group of people regardless of their ethnicity who went nomadic and wandered around in large camps being a public nuisance, I would support fingerprinting them too. It's only fingerprinting; it does no harm. Your attempt to equate this to the Nazis is puerile and ridiculous.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Melchior
Jedi Master
Posts: 1061
Joined: 2005-01-13 10:46am

Post by Melchior »

Darth Wong wrote: It's only fingerprinting; it does no harm. Your attempt to equate this to the Nazis is puerile and ridiculous.
In context, the not actually very subtle messagge from the politicians that advocate this measure in Italy is "we are doing this because death camps would be frowned upon by international opinion" (the same politicians advocated ordering the Navy to sink refugee boats in international waters), this is not an automatic indictment of the idea, but it helps explaining why it is seen with such suspect.
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10714
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Post by Elfdart »

Darth Wong wrote: Fingerprinting is not "going after". It is monitoring, which the authorities did do for the mobsters' families and acquaintances.
When one ethnic group is singled out for this treatment, it is "going after" them. It's harassment based on their ancestry pure and simple. From the article in the OP:
The Interior Minister, Roberto Maroni, a leader of the rabble-rousing Northern League – close allies of Silvio Berlusconi on the government benches – has explained his next step in his assault on the "emergenza di sicurezza", the "security emergency": fingerprinting all Gypsies.

It was the only way, he told a parliamentary committee on Wednesday, for Italy to guarantee "to those who have the right to remain here, the possibility of living in decent conditions." For this purpose the Roma – those with Italian nationality and those without, EU citizens and those from outside the Community – will all have their fingerprints taken. And the rule will even apply to Gypsy children – for reasons that to many of Mr Maroni's supporters must have sounded obvious: "to avoid phenomena," as he put it, "such as begging". The new measures, he said, were indispensable "in order to expel those who do not have the right to stay in Italy".
So they're not targeting vagrants; they are targeting Gypsies.
Wow. The difference between "have less of a problem with" and "think it's OK" might strike you as some grand triumph, but it really isn't. The fact remains that you accused people of thinking molotov attacks aren't so bad.
Still twisting my words, I see. I said they sound as though theft and vagrancy are worse than gasoline bombs, which you contorted into "think molotovs are OK".
This isn't widespread fingerprinting, it's targeted on one ethnic group.
It's targeted on behaviour, not ethnicity. I hate to break the news to you, but all laws target behaviour.
That's funny: Roberto Maroni, who came up with scheme says it's targeted against all Gypsies, whether they are Italian citizens or not.

And all laws target behavior? To think that all those Jim Crow laws screwed over black people because of their behavior and not their skin color!
:roll:

Apples and oranges. Fingerprinting of military recruits is also targeting a certain behaviour, ie- people who sign up for the military. If it was ethnically based, then it would apply regardless of whether these Roma have nomadic lifestyles or fixed addresses.

Did you even read the first post in this thread? Maroni and his fuckwit supporters want to fingerprint all Roma, whether they are citizens or not. I don't know what it takes to become a citizen in Italy, but if it's anything like other countries it means they were born in that country or are immigrants who applied for and received citizenship.
If there was a large group of people regardless of their ethnicity who went nomadic and wandered around in large camps being a public nuisance, I would support fingerprinting them too.
Define "public nuisance".
It's only fingerprinting; it does no harm. Your attempt to equate this to the Nazis is puerile and ridiculous.


It's only a yellow Star of David patch you have to wear on your clothes; it does no harm.

Think I'm exaggerating? Here's a news article on what these Fascists are all about:

Independent
Malcolm Moore in Rome

The new mayor of Rome promised yesterday to purge the Italian capital of 20,000 illegal immigrants and to raze 85 Roma Gypsy camps.

Gianni Alemanno (50) a firebrand neo-fascist and the first rightwing mayor of the city since the Second World War, vowed to make Rome "secure" as he was sworn into office after his election at the weekend.

In a sign of things to come, after Mr Alemanno's election, newly-elected Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi declared: "We are the new Falange."

The original Falange (or Phalanx) was the Spanish fascist party, founded in the 1930s, whose doctrine was adopted by General Franco.

Mr Alemanno's election was also celebrated by hundreds of supporters chanting "Duce! Duce!" and raising their arms in Mussolini's Fascist salute.

The new mayor said his first action would be to begin "immediate expulsions" of the 20,000 immigrants in the city with criminal records.

"We cannot welcome them without discipline," he said. "We will chase out the delinquents. There are 85 abusive nomad camps to destroy."

Many in Italy have been sickened by a spate of violent crimes committed by immigrants, including the case of Giovanna Reggiani (47) who was beaten, raped and killed by a Romanian immigrant who lived in a Roma camp last November.

Mr Alemanno said he would visit Mrs Reggiani's husband.

"I want to promise him that what happened his wife will never happen again," he said.

Mr Alemanno was the youth leader of the fascist Italian Social Movement and wears a Celtic cross, a symbol of the extreme Right. He promised to be a mayor for all, however, and sent letters to the Vatican and Rome's Jewish community.

Graziano Halilovic, a spokesman for one of Rome's biggest settlements of Roma gypsies, said the Roma community was scared for its future.

"We fear there will be night-time raids on the camps."

Umberto Bossi, leader of the Northern League Party, which will form a new government with Mr Berlusconi, said immigrants had to be hunted out. "We have no fear of taking things to the piazzas. We have 300,000 martyrs ready to come down from the mountains. Our rifles are always smoking," he added. (© Daily Telegraph, London)
Imagine if a group of neo-Nazis were part of a governing coalition in Germany or Austria and demanded that Jews be registered with the state, on the grounds of preventing white collar crime.
Netko wrote: The problem is that the current NGO approaches simply aren't working (see the Economist article), the previous communist attempts at treating them like everyone else didn't work, so at this point something new, likely more intrusive is required. Yes, the Italian plan has many failings, beginning from its origins in a false security scare, however the plan itself, as far as I've been able to see (enforcing some minimal expected cultural norms, like not begging, sending kids to school, etc.) doesn't get much hate from me.
If they were going to crack down on panhandling, littering, stealing utilities, petty theft, etc it's one thing. But from the mouths of these Mussolini Lite motherfuckers you hear that they are after the Roma.

I have no beef with cracking down on child molestation, but if someone were to use the case of Jeffrey Epstein to whip up anti-Jewish bigotry and neo-Nazis used the case as an excuse to call for Jews to have to register with the authorities and wear yellow stars on their clothes, I wonder how many people would be in favor of it.
Compared to the Italian plan, there are far better targets for you to show anti-Roma bias, like the actions of the Slovenian authorities a year or two back when a village wanted to chase away a Roma family from their village and the authorities essentially assisted them.
I don't think "everyone does it" is much of an excuse.
And, frankly, claiming that the Roma should be left alone because they only cause petty crimes is morally dubious.


Take your straw man, light it with a match and shove it up your ass. Roma, and any other ethnic or religious group should be left alone except for those who are actually suspected of crimes. No, having a funny accent or weird name or different color of skin isn't grounds to suspect a person of being a criminal.
What about their children? Did you read the accounts in the Economist article and my own? Kids who could be getting higher education, who want to get higher education, and who would be among the most productive members of society are forced by their families to instead work as beggars (sometimes including mutilation for better effectiveness) and scrap scavengers. But that is their culture, so the state has no authority to go in and help those kids out? Fuck you. I don't see you claiming that in the threads involving the wacky polygamist cults and similar shit.
Funny you should bring the children into this. The same Northern League that is promoting the fingerprinting of the Roma threatens to withdraw from Berlusconi's coalition if the government offers housing to them. So much for the idea that this is being proposed to help those poor Gypsy kids.

For the record, I'm not in favor of government surveillance against all Mormons on the grounds that some of them break the law.
See above - it actually does apply to everyone.
According to Melchior, the fingerprinting is voluntary. But if the Fascists in Italy have their way, it's going to be mandatory for the Gypsies.

Plus, with the Roma, while there are obviously plenty of "classical" racists, most people actually have anti-Roma bias based on stereotypes they really do perpetrate - mass begging, child exploitation etc.
Plus, with the Blacks, while there are obviously plenty of "classical" racists,most people actually have anti-Black bias based on stereotypes they really do perpetrate - talking in theaters, street crime etc.

Zombie Jesse Helms is so proud of you.
User avatar
Melchior
Jedi Master
Posts: 1061
Joined: 2005-01-13 10:46am

Post by Melchior »

After some research, it seems that to have an electronic identity card it is necessary to have ones fingerprints taken, but it does not seem mandatory to have an electronic identity card.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Elfdart wrote:When one ethnic group is singled out for this treatment, it is "going after" them. It's harassment based on their ancestry pure and simple. From the article in the OP:
The Interior Minister, Roberto Maroni, a leader of the rabble-rousing Northern League – close allies of Silvio Berlusconi on the government benches – has explained his next step in his assault on the "emergenza di sicurezza", the "security emergency": fingerprinting all Gypsies.
It was the only way, he told a parliamentary committee on Wednesday, for Italy to guarantee "to those who have the right to remain here, the possibility of living in decent conditions." For this purpose the Roma – those with Italian nationality and those without, EU citizens and those from outside the Community – will all have their fingerprints taken. And the rule will even apply to Gypsy children – for reasons that to many of Mr Maroni's supporters must have sounded obvious: "to avoid phenomena," as he put it, "such as begging". The new measures, he said, were indispensable "in order to expel those who do not have the right to stay in Italy".
So they're not targeting vagrants; they are targeting Gypsies.
Perhaps there is a problem in the translation from Italian to English, but part of the definition of the English word "gypsy" actually is the nomadic lifestyle.
Wow. The difference between "have less of a problem with" and "think it's OK" might strike you as some grand triumph, but it really isn't. The fact remains that you accused people of thinking molotov attacks aren't so bad.
Still twisting my words, I see. I said they sound as though theft and vagrancy are worse than gasoline bombs, which you contorted into "think molotovs are OK".
I don't have to twist your words. I can quote you right here and point out that NO ONE ACTUALLY SAID THAT. For all of your flailing about the subject, this entire tangent is your personal invention. The fact that you're trying to score so many points from me incorrectly describing your strawman is so ironic it's not funny.
That's funny: Roberto Maroni, who came up with scheme says it's targeted against all Gypsies, whether they are Italian citizens or not.

And all laws target behavior? To think that all those Jim Crow laws screwed over black people because of their behavior and not their skin color!
:roll:
As I said, the word "gypsy" in English actually refers to a behaviour, not just an ethnicity.
Did you even read the first post in this thread? Maroni and his fuckwit supporters want to fingerprint all Roma, whether they are citizens or not. I don't know what it takes to become a citizen in Italy, but if it's anything like other countries it means they were born in that country or are immigrants who applied for and received citizenship.
Yes, I read the first post. It referred to "nomadi rom"; a term which pretty clearly seems to suggest to me that one must actually be a nomad to qualify. No "drop of blood" qualifications.
Define "public nuisance".
Do they pay taxes to support the public lands and public services they're using, either deliberately or inadvertently through making a mess and not cleaning up after themselves? How could that not be a public nuisance?
It's only fingerprinting; it does no harm. Your attempt to equate this to the Nazis is puerile and ridiculous.

It's only a yellow Star of David patch you have to wear on your clothes; it does no harm.
Apples and oranges. A star of David patch is intended to make you clearly visible to your enemies. Fingerprinting has no effect whatsoever on your life unless you are caught committing a crime.
Think I'm exaggerating?
Yes.
Here's a news article on what these Fascists are all about:
It's entirely possible that the people pushing this agenda are low-lifes. I don't really care about that; I merely object to your bizarre assertion that fingerprinting is some kind of heinous human-rights violation, or that anyone who has a problem with these people must be a racist. Neither leap in logic is justifiable.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10714
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Post by Elfdart »

Darth Wong wrote: Perhaps there is a problem in the translation from Italian to English, but part of the definition of the English word "gypsy" actually is the nomadic lifestyle.
Gypsy is a term for the nomadic people from India (IIRC) who migrated to Europe centuries ago. The Europeans assumed they were from Egypt. It refers to people who call themselves Roma.

I don't have to twist your words. I can quote you right here and point out that NO ONE ACTUALLY SAID THAT.
AND I NEVER SAID THEY DID
As I said, the word "gypsy" in English actually refers to a behaviour, not just an ethnicity.
Bullshit:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
Main Entry:
Gyp·sy Listen to the pronunciation of Gypsy
Pronunciation:
\ˈjip-sē\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural Gypsies
Etymology:
by shortening & alteration from Egyptian
Date:
1537

1: a member of a traditionally itinerant people who originated in northern India and now live chiefly in south and southwest Asia, Europe, and North America

2: romany 2

3 not capitalized : one that resembles a Gypsy; especially : wanderer
The word Gypsy is capitalized in these news reports and from the fascists themselves. They're referring to the Roma people.

Define "public nuisance".
Do they pay taxes to support the public lands and public services they're using, either deliberately or inadvertently through making a mess and not cleaning up after themselves? How could that not be a public nuisance?
Then fine the ones who trash the place and charge user fees to camp in parks. You don't have to single out one ethnic group to do it.
Apples and oranges. A star of David patch is intended to make you clearly visible to your enemies. Fingerprinting has no effect whatsoever on your life unless you are caught committing a crime.
Tell that to Brandon Mayfield.


It's entirely possible that the people pushing this agenda are low-lifes. I don't really care about that;
You don't care that a group of people with a proven track record of racist violence will (if they get their way) have a new stick they can use to beat on those whom they've tried to exterminate before. Nice.
I merely object to your bizarre assertion that fingerprinting is some kind of heinous human-rights violation, or that anyone who has a problem with these people must be a racist. Neither leap in logic is justifiable.
Fingerprinting in and of itself is not the issue. It's the fact that it's reserved for a minority group that is already the target of racist violence by the very same bigots who want to fingerprint them. Having problems with a group of people based on the actions of a few is in fact the very textbook example of prejudice and bigotry. You must not have a problem when redneck cops pull over black people for the "crime" of DWB, either.
User avatar
Fingolfin_Noldor
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11834
Joined: 2006-05-15 10:36am
Location: At the Helm of the HAB Star Dreadnaught Star Fist

Post by Fingolfin_Noldor »

Elfdart wrote:In that case, the accomplice has in fact broken the law. But unless they have real evidence that someone is plotting to commit a crime or harbor fugitives, they have no business hassling people for the "crime" of being related to a suspect or being in the same ethnic group as the suspect.
What? Quite frankly, the moment a group of them are protecting their own people, the lot of them are liable to either get charged for obstructing justic or for harboring fugitives. The only ones possibly to left out of it are the children who know nuts about what's going on. Going on flailing that this is "harrassing an ethnic group" is pure nonsense when they display this sort of tribalistic behaviour.
Then fine the ones who trash the place and charge user fees to camp in parks. You don't have to single out one ethnic group to do it.
Don't act stupid. You know perfectly well that when you start arresting them, you are going to arrest a good chunk of them, and still be screaming harrassment.
Image
STGOD: Byzantine Empire
Your spirit, diseased as it is, refuses to allow you to give up, no matter what threats you face... and whatever wreckage you leave behind you.
Kreia
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Elfdart wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Perhaps there is a problem in the translation from Italian to English, but part of the definition of the English word "gypsy" actually is the nomadic lifestyle.
Gypsy is a term for the nomadic people from India (IIRC) who migrated to Europe centuries ago. The Europeans assumed they were from Egypt. It refers to people who call themselves Roma.
OK, simple question then: are they still regarded as gypsies if they settle down and get apartments and jobs?
I don't have to twist your words. I can quote you right here and point out that NO ONE ACTUALLY SAID THAT.
AND I NEVER SAID THEY DID
So when you said "they sound as if", you actually meant ... who, precisely?
As I said, the word "gypsy" in English actually refers to a behaviour, not just an ethnicity.
Bullshit:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
Main Entry:
Gyp·sy Listen to the pronunciation of Gypsy
Pronunciation:
\ˈjip-sē\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural Gypsies
Etymology:
by shortening & alteration from Egyptian
Date:
1537

1: a member of a traditionally itinerant people who originated in northern India and now live chiefly in south and southwest Asia, Europe, and North America

2: romany 2

3 not capitalized : one that resembles a Gypsy; especially : wanderer
The word Gypsy is capitalized in these news reports and from the fascists themselves. They're referring to the Roma people.
Well I certainly wasn't, and nor were any of the other people in this thread who were grousing about gypsies. You seem to be trying to treat us all as if we are promoters of this particular political party in Italy, when it should be obvious by now that we're not even familiar with this party or its policies.
Then fine the ones who trash the place and charge user fees to camp in parks. You don't have to single out one ethnic group to do it.
I agree. That doesn't mean I would back off my earlier endorsement of targeting nomads. You seem to prefer talking about this particular Italian political party, as if I'm somehow a part of it.
Apples and oranges. A star of David patch is intended to make you clearly visible to your enemies. Fingerprinting has no effect whatsoever on your life unless you are caught committing a crime.
Tell that to Brandon Mayfield.
So ... if some incompetent examiner fucks up a fingerprint match, this means that fingerprinting is a human-rights violation? How many other kinds of fuckups have investigators made? Should we discard all of those other methods too?
It's entirely possible that the people pushing this agenda are low-lifes. I don't really care about that;
You don't care that a group of people with a proven track record of racist violence will (if they get their way) have a new stick they can use to beat on those whom they've tried to exterminate before. Nice.
Don't be a fucking twat. When I say "I don't care about that", I'm referring to its relevance to my argument in this thread.
Fingerprinting in and of itself is not the issue. It's the fact that it's reserved for a minority group that is already the target of racist violence by the very same bigots who want to fingerprint them.
That does not say anything whatsoever about my position on fingerprinting nomads. I am not a member of this group you refer to and I don't have to answer for their crimes, which have no relevance to my own position. Your ceaseless attempts to prop up this Guilt By Association fallacy of yours do not make it any more valid.
Having problems with a group of people based on the actions of a few is in fact the very textbook example of prejudice and bigotry. You must not have a problem when redneck cops pull over black people for the "crime" of DWB, either.
See above. The Guilt By Association fallacy is no more valid when you do it than when Rush Limbaugh does it.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10714
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Post by Elfdart »

Fingolfin_Noldor wrote: What? Quite frankly, the moment a group of them are protecting their own people, the lot of them are liable to either get charged for obstructing justic or for harboring fugitives. The only ones possibly to left out of it are the children who know nuts about what's going on. Going on flailing that this is "harrassing an ethnic group" is pure nonsense when they display this sort of tribalistic behaviour.
When cops raid an apartment complex looking for a dope dealer, do they arrest his or her family? Only if they are hiding his stash or lying to the police to cover for him. They don't just drag the whole family down to the station because one member was committing a crime. There's no reason to treat people in vans and RV any differently.
Don't act stupid. You know perfectly well that when you start arresting them, you are going to arrest a good chunk of them, and still be screaming harrassment.
People squeal about harassment when they're busted cold. Big fucking deal. It's only a legitimate issue if people are being singled out for reasons other than behavior.
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10714
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Post by Elfdart »

Darth Wong wrote: OK, simple question then: are they still regarded as gypsies if they settle down and get apartments and jobs?
They are considered Gypsies no matter what they do. Unless they manage to hide their background.
So when you said "they sound as if", you actually meant ... who, precisely?
Everyone who was babbling on about how the Gypsies and similar groups suck, their culture sucks, what can we do to stop them from sucking, the government should take measures to stop them from sucking, etc...


All of it being one massive red herring when the subject was the Italian Fascists' plans for mandatory fingerprinting of all Gypsies (whether citizens or not) and the campaign of violence against them. It's classic blaming the victim bullshit, like the racist fucktards who attacked "black culture" when people were drowning and being eaten by alligators in New Orleans. I don't give a flying fuck if they (Gypsies, Blacks, Puerto Ricans, Mormons, Amish, whatever) all steal hubcaps and listen to Slim Whitman, and how shitty their "culture" might be, it has nothing to do with racist douchecocks throwing gasoline bombs at them or leaving them to drown and be eaten by reptiles.


Well I certainly wasn't, and nor were any of the other people in this thread who were grousing about gypsies. You seem to be trying to treat us all as if we are promoters of this particular political party in Italy, when it should be obvious by now that we're not even familiar with this party or its policies.
Well pardon the fuck out of me for sticking to the subject of the OP. It was referring to Gypsies/ Roma. It's not my problem if Yellow Rain Man wants to bring up Irish Travelers or some other red herring plucked out of his ass.


So ... if some incompetent examiner fucks up a fingerprint match, this means that fingerprinting is a human-rights violation? How many other kinds of fuckups have investigators made? Should we discard all of those other methods too?
The point is, you shouldn't hand more powers over to people with a known track record for abusing them.

That does not say anything whatsoever about my position on fingerprinting nomads.
Which has nothing to do with their plan to fingerprint the Roma, an ethnic group. If the government had announced it was going to crack down on trash, theft, begging and cracked down on everyone they caught doing it (not just the Roma), there wouldn't be a problem. But that's not what they want to do.

If you're only referring to nomad behavior then it's a red herring because that's not the reason for the anti-Roma schemes in Italy any more than black crime was the real reason for Jim Crow laws. The giveaway should have been the bit about Gypsy baby snatchers. It's scapegoating an ethnic minority and using state power to bully those people.

One more thing: The idea of using state power to discourage "nomad" activity would wreck the economy of any civilized country. What do interstate truck drivers do? They spend a great deal of time in their vehicles, traveling from one place to another. This includes sleeping in parks, rest stops and anywhere else they're allowed to shut down. It would also fuck over retirees (and anyone else) who travel across the country in RVs or vans. By what standard would you discourage nomads without discouraging truckers and others who make long trips on the roads?
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Elfdart wrote:I don't give a flying fuck if they (Gypsies, Blacks, Puerto Ricans, Mormons, Amish, whatever) all steal hubcaps and listen to Slim Whitman, and how shitty their "culture" might be, it has nothing to do with racist douchecocks throwing gasoline bombs at them or leaving them to drown and be eaten by reptiles.
I won't argue with that.
Well pardon the fuck out of me for sticking to the subject of the OP. It was referring to Gypsies/ Roma. It's not my problem if Yellow Rain Man wants to bring up Irish Travelers or some other red herring plucked out of his ass.
Well excuuuuuuse me, but the article in the OP described the group in question as nomads. It said nothing about their ethnicity being targeted regardless of whether they were nomads or not, so most of us were discussing the idea of monitoring these essentially homeless migrant groups. It's hardly a hijack.
The point is, you shouldn't hand more powers over to people with a known track record for abusing them.
So ... information is the same thing as "more powers" now? Since when did information and power become the same thing? All we're talking about is giving the authorities more information.

I've never had a problem with the idea of a highly monitored society. Some people do; they refer to it as a police state. But as a matter of principle, "power" and "information" are not the same thing, and I don't see why they should be treated as the same thing. It's possible to have a police force with a great many limits on its powers, but which nevertheless has cameras monitoring every public street in the city (for example). It doesn't necessarily make the society into a repressive tyranny.
If you're only referring to nomad behavior then it's a red herring because that's not the reason for the anti-Roma schemes in Italy any more than black crime was the real reason for Jim Crow laws.
Come on, read the OP. It equates the gypsies to nomads, so we simply followed its lead. If it's actually ethnic discrimination regardless of their conduct, then that's not really what the OP describes. You could argue that the OP is just plain wrong, but ranting at people who took the idea of the OP and tried to discuss it is just silly.
One more thing: The idea of using state power to discourage "nomad" activity would wreck the economy of any civilized country. What do interstate truck drivers do? They spend a great deal of time in their vehicles, traveling from one place to another. This includes sleeping in parks, rest stops and anywhere else they're allowed to shut down. It would also fuck over retirees (and anyone else) who travel across the country in RVs or vans. By what standard would you discourage nomads without discouraging truckers and others who make long trips on the roads?
Truckers are already subjected to heavier monitoring than other people, which is why there are special licenses and inspection stations for them. This example does not help your case.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10714
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Post by Elfdart »

Alright, how about vacationers?
Post Reply