Create a star

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Ziggy Stardust
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3114
Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
Location: Research Triangle, NC

Create a star

Post by Ziggy Stardust »

This is a random hypothetical question inspired by a news item (admittedly, it's an old one) that I stumbled across. Link. For whatever reason this just got me to thinking: assuming that what scientists presently theorize about the 'birth cycle' of stars, what sort of technology would be required to actually create a sun?

The current theory (I don't know too much about astronomy, so I don't know how much evidence has been accrued in support of these theories, but I am going to take it for granted, for the sake of the hypothetical, that they are accurate) is that clouds of molecular gas "collapse" after reaching a certain critical density and temperature, which makes them unstable. Over the course of several hundred thousand years, rotating spheres of superhot gas form, and fusion of deuterium begins. After a long period of time (I can't find an exact figure), if the star gets hot enough, hydrogen fusion occurs, and the star rapidly becomes stable and main-sequence. This is a very brief, lay overview of the initial stages in the birth of a star; hopefully some of you will know more about the process.

Anyway, it takes millions of years for the transition from gaseous cloud to main-sequence star. Assume some advanced future civilization that, for whatever reason, has unlimited resources devoted to this project, wants to create a star (that will be similar to our Sun). What sort of technology would they need to actually do it? For example, would they develop something to accelerate globs of superheated matter at near-light-speed into clouds of gas creating supersonic shock waves that begins a chain reaction leading to collapse, (from here)? Or would there, given sufficient technological might, be a simpler way of doing things?

And, here's the clincher: how much technology/resources would be needed to not only initiate creation, but to create a fully formed main-sequence star within a single human lifetime?
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Lots of ram jets and a few million years. Deploy ram jets outside nebula. Use ram jet field to push matter forward as you go rather then collecting it. End result is just accelerating the natural process.

To do it in a human life time? Some kind of time dilation machine to extend the life of the human.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Post by Kanastrous »

Ender wrote:
To do it in a human life time? Some kind of time dilation machine to extend the life of the human.
:D
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

Ender wrote:Lots of ram jets and a few million years. Deploy ram jets outside nebula. Use ram jet field to push matter forward as you go rather then collecting it. End result is just accelerating the natural process.
You could also use the ramscoops as collectors, only in this application the nebular material is directed instead toward a common core point defined by the positions of the scoops. You could have a large asteroid in that position as a gravitational "anchor" (yes, the specific gravity of the body would be infinitessimal even in comparison to one of the smaller moons, but enough to act as an initial building block, so to speak).
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Post by Zixinus »

Create a box made out of forcefields the size of a small nebula. Trap enough interstellar dust to create a sun. Push box of forcefields into being smaller, until the nebula starts to gather by itself.

Use super-hyper-oh-shit-that's-strong laser, nukes or something to occasionally heat things up if you need to.

Then again, I've read that you need a certain type of dust and density for thing to heat up properly, as if there is too much contact then the a choke-point will conducts its heat away.

Granted this is the kind of technology that would make even people from Star Trek or Star Wars wet themselves. In concert.

You can also make an uber-powerful gravity engine that pulls interstellar dust towards it. If it can gather up enough, the fusion process might start by itself, although with the destruction of the machine.

All this within a human lifetime? Make the human life long. Very, very, very, very, very , very ,very long.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

Zixinus wrote:All this within a human lifetime? Make the human life long. Very, very, very, very, very , very ,very long.
Easily enough done. Your crew of engineers will need to periodically check the progress of the collection operation, so put them in shifts on relativistic shuttles. As one group comes in, the next one heads outward, accelerating to a high fraction of c. and cruising for a year or two relative.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Post by Zixinus »

Actually, if you can make several uber-powerful gravity generators that create anti-gravity as well as gravity and place them well, you can compress the star's nebula even faster. You'll most likely first get a hot pocket of gas and then you have to work your way up until . You might even want to manipulate the hot pockets as well.

You might speed up the process even further by starting or helping the fusion process yourself by nukes or the mentioned gravity generators to create some sort of collecting effect at the core of the star.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
Kuroneko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: 2003-03-13 03:10am
Location: Fréchet space
Contact:

Post by Kuroneko »

Inputing thermal energy, through nukes or otherwise, is absolutely the last thing you would want to do if your task is to speed up stellar formation. The colder the gas is, the faster the star will form.

A spherical molecular cloud of solar mass and, say, average molar mass of 2.5g/mol [1] and average density of 1e6 particles per m³ [2] would be about 5 light-years in radius. Newton's law r" = -μ/r² has the solution r = R/2(1+cos θ), t = (R/2)sqrt(R/2μ)(θ+sin θ), where R is the orbital apogee, so that even if all thermal energy is pseudomagically removed so that the cloud can freefall as dust rather than as collapse as a fluid [3], the time it would take for the matter at the midradius R = 2.5ly (μ = 1.5e19 m³/s²) to contract to half that (θ=π/2) would be about 27 million years.

Although roughly uniform density is probably not at all realistic, it still establishes the scale even under ideal thermal conditions (T = 0) as millions of years. Anyone interested could run the calculation again for different parameters and even a non-uniform initial density distribution (this would just change how μ at a given radius is calculated), but it is clear that massive speedup of the degree required is impossible without magic or a loophole of the type Ender proposed.

[1] I'm not at all sure what the typical compositions of such things is--molecular hydrogen would of course be about 2.0g/mol, but the cloud would also contain heavier elements and molecules.
[2] This is probably on the dense side.
[3] Naturally, this would be the fall of the Ziggy stardust.
"The fool saith in his heart that there is no empty set. But if that were so, then the set of all such sets would be empty, and hence it would be the empty set." -- Wesley Salmon
User avatar
Aquatain
Padawan Learner
Posts: 294
Joined: 2004-11-02 07:13am
Location: Ever Expanding Empire of Denmark

Post by Aquatain »

Find some Aliens and begin to chant"..The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain.."..
There Lives More Faith In Honest Doubt,Belive Me,Than In Half The Creeds. ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson.

"The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity."
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Post by Zixinus »

Since we are already manipulating time and space in some of our exemples, there is also the idea that you can create a pocket-dimension (or whatever) in which you use machines to do the process. Time in that area is sped up several times, so you can have the ability for the star to properly form and do it under one human lifetime.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
starslayer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 731
Joined: 2008-04-04 08:40pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by starslayer »

As Kuroneko said, you don't want to add much energy to the cloud. It turns out that there are clouds in nature that collapse too fast, heat up too much, and blow themselves apart. You may be able to counteract this somewhat by adding a surprising chemical: water. According to an article in Astronomy magazine I read some years ago, there is evidence that in order to form stars like the Sun, slightly wet clouds do a far better job, simply because of their higher heat capacity, which prevents the molecules from acquiring too much kinetic energy and flying apart. In any case, speeding up the process by many orders of magnitude seems a pipe dream, even for a civilization with SAT (Sufficiently Advanced Technology). However, as others have noted, if we can exploit relativity, this becomes fairly easy.
User avatar
Omeganian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 547
Joined: 2008-03-08 10:38am
Location: Israel

Post by Omeganian »

You'll need to invest a lot of energy into accelerating. And then find some way to bleed off the excess energy. Depressing.
Q: How are children made in the TNG era Federation?

A: With power couplings. To explain, you shut down the power to the lights, and then, in the darkness, you have the usual TOS era coupling.
User avatar
Xon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6206
Joined: 2002-07-16 06:12am
Location: Western Australia

Post by Xon »

Ender wrote:To do it in a human life time? Some kind of time dilation machine to extend the life of the human.
A single Xeelee Nightfighter from Stephan Baxter's Xeelee Sequence condenced a cloud of atomic Hydrogen into a star and then artificially induced fusion to the levels to create a Earth-sized planet in six months.

But the Xeelee are right up there in technology which manipulates the structure of space/time.
"Okay, I'll have the truth with a side order of clarity." ~ Dr. Daniel Jackson.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ~ Stephen Colbert
"One Drive, One Partition, the One True Path" ~ ars technica forums - warrens - on hhd partitioning schemes.
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

Zixinus wrote:Since we are already manipulating time and space in some of our exemples, there is also the idea that you can create a pocket-dimension (or whatever) in which you use machines to do the process. Time in that area is sped up several times, so you can have the ability for the star to properly form and do it under one human lifetime.
Why don't you just wave a magic wand and say "Abracadabra!"? Ooh! I know! Let's have zillions of teeny-tiny fairies carry individual molecules to one place. Or if that doesn't work, we'll remodulate the deflector dish to salt the nebula with subspace stellagenic particles. And if all else fails, we'll just catch a leprechaun and make a wish.

Come on. When someone says, "How could X be done?", presumably he wants an answer that requires some thought. He could just make up imaginary physics-busting technology on his own.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
Post Reply