Strange Question About Coruscant

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Strange Question About Coruscant

Post by Havok »

A science type question for all the knowledgeable folks.

With all the steel, concrete and other building materials used in creating Coruscant, (miles of vertical buildings in some places, yes?) I am assuming not all of it is from the planet itself, would the mass added over the course of the planets life have any effect on it's gravity for it's inhabitants, gravitational pull, orbit or the orbit of it's moons?
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Even assuming the entire surface is covered in a solid block of iron 4 km thick (a gross overestimate) it adds only 3.1*10^22 kgs to the total mass, which was already 1.637*10^25 kgs. From Newton's second law F=m*a, so F=m2*g. From Newton's first law F=G(m1*m2/r^2) so F=(G(m1/r^2))*m2
Substitute and rearrange for g=G(m1/r^2).
g=6.67*10^-11(1.64*10^25/(8.854*10^6)^2) = 13.95 m/s^2, compared to the initial gravitational acceleration of 13.93 m/s^2.

So it is negligible on any kind of observable time frame.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Post by Havok »

Cool. Thanks.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Not to mention, I wouldn't be surprised if in-situ construction and fabrication technology isn't so sophisticated they couldn't have subsurface bores extracting material, refining it, and fabricating it into usable structures and inhabitable honeycomb, with a minority of imported material.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Post by Junghalli »

Basically what Ender said, it amounts to at most an extra few km of crust (and crust honeycombed with air spaces at that), so the mass should be negligable compared to the mass of the planet.

Also, unless they're building with real exotic materials I doubt most of it would be imported. Even with Wars hyperdrive importing the equivalent of concrete and steel from other planets strikes me as much less economical than simply having a bunch of quarries and mines on the planet.
Post Reply