Judge to White House: Comply with subpeonas.

[SirNitram]

Link

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge ruled on Thursday that Congress in its fight with the Bush administration can subpoena current and former top White House aides in its investigation over the firing of U.S. attorneys.

U.S. District Judge John Bates, who was appointed to the bench by President George W. Bush, rejected the administration's arguments that the aides were immune from such subpoenas and that Congress cannot force them to testify or turn over certain documents.

In a lengthy ruling totalling nearly 100 pages, he rejected the administration's request to dismiss the lawsuit that had been filed by the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee in March.

The lawsuit seeks to get testimony or documents from White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers.

The lawsuit charged that Bolten and Miers, cited by the House for contempt of Congress, defied subpoenas by refusing to testify or provide documents in the long-running investigation into the administration's 2006 firing of nine of the 93 U.S. attorneys.

It marked the first time the House or the Senate had ever filed a lawsuit to enforce a subpoena aimed at the White House.

"We disagree with the district court's decision," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino. "We are reviewing it and once we've had a chance to do that we'll consider whether the decision should be appealed."

But House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers viewed the decision as a victory for Congress.

"Today's landmark ruling is a ringing reaffirmation of the fundamental principle of checks and balances and the basic American idea that no person is above the law," the Michigan Democrat said in a statement.

Disclosure of the firings had prompted charges by Democratic lawmakers that the dismissals were politically motivated and led to the resignations of a number of top Justice Department officials, including the departure under fire nearly a year ago of Alberto Gonzales as U.S. attorney general.

Bates ruled that Miers is required to testify under the subpoena, but she still may invoke executive privilege in response to specific questions.

He also ruled that Bolten and Miers must produce all documents requested by the subpoena and must provide a specific description of any documents withheld based on executive privilege -- the power claimed by the president to keep private certain information regarding presidential decision-making.

The administration had argued that senior White House aides had immunity from being compelled to testify to protect confidential advice they provide a president.

Do you think the DOJ will actually enforce those contempt citations they were given now?

[Darth Wong]

These people will never go to jail as they deserve for their brazen acts of contempt. If worst comes to worst, Bush will just pardon them all. But it won't even come to that; if people continue to push for this, I imagine that the Republicans and their media lapdogs will try to paint it as "Democratic partisanship", thus hurting them in the court of public opinion. Because the people love nothing more than a wildly blatant double standard.

[SirNitram]

Don't worry! Should Obama become president, even the slightest possibility of the flicker of an idea of considering to be late in complying with a subpeona will be an instant Constitutional Crisis demanding 24 hour news coverage.

[Stormbringer]

When exactly was the last time a contempt of Congress charge actually stuck, especially when the person was as connected as Rove or Miers?

[Darth Wong]

When exactly was the last time a contempt of Congress charge actually stuck, especially when the person was as connected as Rove or Miers?

I don't recall any time before that so many people so brazenly ignored the subpoenas. Even Bill Clinton himself showed up for questioning.

[Adrian Laguna]

It's too bad Congress doesn't have any balls, the Constitution grants them exclusive power over the nation's purse strings, which effectively makes them the most powerful branch... if they can unify for a common purpose. Imagine Congress telling the White House that either people start testifying, or they can figure out how to pay their own bills. Or another fun one, Congress threatening to cut off funding to every Federal law enforcement agency in the country unless they start doing their jobs and enforcing the subpoenas.

[Ford Prefect]

"We disagree with the district court's decision," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino. "We are reviewing it and once we've had a chance to do that we'll consider whether the decision should be appealed."

Of course you don't agree, so of course you'll appeal. And if you don't like the result of the appeal, you'll appeal again, and again, until you can't appeal any more. At which point you will pointedly pretend that the ruling was never made and hope that no one mentions it again.