In summary, I think your perspective on nomenclature is pretty superficial, and I think we should stay away from simplistic thinking and piecemeal invention. Are Grand Moff and Grand Vizier analogous to Grand Admiral? They have "grand" in them.Admiral Felire wrote:About Admiral General, how about that not all militaries use it and that I don't think it fits here.
And honestly, since I am in this project my opinions matter on whether we utilize it as a common thing. Now its not the only opinion that matters, but it matters. I dislike them and do not then they have the right feel. Isn't that the point of this, to give Star Wars the right feel again?
My official vote on that is not to use it, its not needed, it doesn't work and it shouldn't be there. It the same with the Colonel General thing. I vote that we do not use it.
I say that if we are going to use Grand Admiral for the Navy then we should use Grand something for the army, and in this case its either General or Marshal. Marshal works fine. Uniformity between the services is not a bad thing.
Nor do we have to stick with one real world culture to make our rank structure. We are talking about an military that comes from an entire galaxy. They probably have taken things from multiple sources and if it works it works and we should use it.
About opinions, sure they are welcome and feeling does matter. But not all feelings are equal. Those supported by a substantive argument and/or with attributed examples and evidence are better than those without.
The Empire has 10s of thousands of Sector Groups (its comparable to the squad relative to the U.S. Army). Do you think that should be the largest formation? Besides, we already have larger ones - the Groups of Forces at each Regional level, and the Color Weapon Commands at the Oversectorial level. And that's just colonial service on the part of the military, really just garrisons and defensive formations when you think about it. Doesn't include the galactic level, strategic formations at all.Admiral Felire wrote:Just because we change the numbers within the Sector Group does not mean we are changing the actual category of the Sector Group. It makes sense that the largest normal unit of military operation is the group assigned to the sector, as that is the central organizational level within the Empire.
Oversectors will have more than one Sector Group, and specialized detachments might have either less than a Sector Group or many Sector Groups at their command.
Imperial Intelligence is an armed service like the Army, Navy, and Marines. This is substantiated by Ysanne Isard wearing a red AFI uniform, and the fact it is stated directly by the Imperial Sourcebook. It is not just a civilian agency.Admiral Felire wrote:On the Intelligence ranks, I think that the Imperial Intelligence should just use normal bureaucratic agency ranks not made up ranks that come out of nowhere. I like what Publius does, but I don't think that this makes any sense. And despite us using Publius as 'canon' it doesn't mean we cannot change what he wrote.
I vote that the Intelligence uses normal organization ranks.
The OOB of the ISB is predicated on the assumption that planetary-level armies would be commanded by high-ranking general officers. I'm saying they rate only field grade.Admiral Felire wrote:I am not talking about planetary armies. I am talking about those assigned to Sectors of the galaxy. Why should we change the fact that Sector Groups are the premier unit in the galaxy. It works fine for me. More important sectors will have higher ranked admirals in command.
High Commander is just a new intermediate rank for the Navy. A junior captain, commanding cruiser class and maybe some destroyer class vessels. Sub-commander is another one, for commanding ships like Nebulon-B escort frigates. Sub-lieutenant is the Royal Navy equivalent of the U.S. Navy rank of Lieutenant, Junior Grade.Admiral Felire wrote:I am somewhat hesitate on naval ranks O-7, O-5, O-2. In your opinion what would they do, why are they present.
I imagine that a Captain would command an Eclipse and other lesser ships-of-the-line, and several of the departments could be rated as high commanders.Admiral Felire wrote:Does High Commander a rank used on the largest of ships. So the Captain is in command, has multiple High Commanders, and each High Commander oversees a Commander of a of particular section or department of the ship.
Okay.Admiral Felire wrote:I have no problem with O-8 to O-15. Nor do I have a problem with O-17. This is navy of course.