Only 1% of 80 billion oil revenue going to Iraq

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Erik von Nein
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2005-06-25 04:27am
Location: Boy Hell. Much nicer than Girl Hell.
Contact:

Only 1% of 80 billion oil revenue going to Iraq

Post by Erik von Nein »

Well, it's infrastructure rebuilding, anyway.
WSJ wrote:Iraq Isn't Spending Oil Windfall
On Infrastructure
U.S. Says About 1%
Of $80 Billion Goes
To Roads, Bridges
By IAN TALLEY
August 6, 2008; Page A11


Iraq is generating revenue of about $80 billion a year, mainly from its vast reserves of crude oil, but spending only about 1% of the total on maintaining critical infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges and sanitation, the U.S. government auditor said.

Meanwhile, the U.S. has appropriated around $48 billion in the past several years to help reconstruction efforts, the U.S. Government Accountability Office said.
FIGHT FOR IRAQ
 
See continuing coverage of developments in Iraq, including an interactive map of day-to-day events in Iraq and a tally of military deaths.

The Iraqi government -- which controls the fourth-largest conventional reserves in the world, with an estimated 115 billion barrels of crude -- gets approximately 90% of its revenue from oil sales, which have jumped in value with this year's rise in prices.

The increased revenue puts the government of Iraq "in a much stronger position to ultimately shoulder the full burden of its development, reconstruction and security programs," said Andy Baukol, deputy assistant secretary of Middle Easy and Africa at the U.S. Treasury Department, in comments on the GAO report.

"Iraq has more than adequate funds to make and maintain capital investments that deliver services and create conditions that foster economic growth," Mr. Baukol said.

The GAO, which is the investigative arm of Congress, estimates that for 2008, Iraq could generate between $73.5 billion and $86.2 billion in total revenue, of which oil exports will account for between $66.5 billion to $79.2 billion. That is based on Iraqi oil ranging from $96.88 to $125.29 a barrel and oil export volumes ranging from 1.89 million to 2.01 million barrels a day.

That figure is up significantly from the oil-export sales from 2005-2007 that accounted for about $90.2 billion for both years. In that period, Iraq spent 90% of its $67 billion in expenditures on operating costs such as salaries, pensions and services. Most of the remainder was spent on investment expenditures, such as structures, machinery and vehicles.

Just 1% of the Iraqi government expenditures went to maintenance of roads, bridges, vehicles, buildings, water, sanitation and electricity installations, oil pipelines and weapons.

"It does seem like a low percentage," said GAO Director of International Affairs and Trade Joseph Christoff. "It's quite a bit of investment that we [the U.S.] have made and the need for maintenance is pretty substantial as well," he said in an interview.

The GAO estimates that Iraq had an estimated cumulative budget surplus of about $29 billion from 2005 to 2007. For 2008, the GAO estimates Iraq will have a budget surplus between $38.2 billion to $50.3 billion.

Officials say Iraq's shortage of trained staff, weak procurement and budgeting systems, and violence and sectarian strife affect the government's ability to spend more of its revenue on capital investments intended to rebuild its infrastructure.

In the relatively calmer northern region of Iraq where the Kurdistan regional government rules, investment expenditures for critical infrastructure have surged, while investment by the central ministries declined in 2007, the GAO said.

Write to Ian Talley at ian.talley@dowjones.com


Well, well. Isn't that surprising?
"To make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the universe."
— Carl Sagan

Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Out of curiosity, how much does the Federal government spend on the various states and territories?
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Erik von Nein
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2005-06-25 04:27am
Location: Boy Hell. Much nicer than Girl Hell.
Contact:

Post by Erik von Nein »

More than 1%

But what does it matter if they didn't? The money from oil revenues was suppoesd to go toward paying for the rebuilding in Iraq in the first place. [/quote]
"To make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the universe."
— Carl Sagan

Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Erik von Nein wrote:More than 1%

But what does it matter if they didn't? The money from oil revenues was suppoesd to go toward paying for the rebuilding in Iraq in the first place.
It matters because we are paying the rest. If we were spending more on Iraq then we were full fledged states it would be something of note, wouldn't it?
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Erik von Nein
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2005-06-25 04:27am
Location: Boy Hell. Much nicer than Girl Hell.
Contact:

Post by Erik von Nein »

Ah, that's what you mean. Except what was exceptional to note was that only 1% of the oil profits from Iraq are going to Iraq's infrastructure, not that the federal government was only spending 1% of it's budget on Iraq itself. Especially when the oil profits were supposed to go toward rebuilding the infrastructure in the first place.
"To make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the universe."
— Carl Sagan

Image
User avatar
Raw Shark
Stunt Driver / Babysitter
Posts: 7982
Joined: 2005-11-24 09:35am
Location: One Mile Up

Re: Only 1% of 80 billion oil revenue going to Iraq

Post by Raw Shark »

Ian Talley wrote:The increased revenue puts the government of Iraq "in a much stronger position to ultimately shoulder the full burden of its development, reconstruction and security programs," said Andy Baukol, deputy assistant secretary of Middle Easy and Africa at the U.S. Treasury Department, in comments on the GAO report.
Yeah, it used to be the Middle East, but it started telling everybody to call it the Middle Easy right around when those fat checks started rolling in and it got all that bling on its teeth.

"Do I really look like a guy with a plan? Y'know what I am? I'm a dog chasing cars. I wouldn't know what to do with one if I caught it! Y'know, I just do things..." --The Joker
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

I’m not that surprised, as the article points out the combination of a government that is not fully developed and staffed, and a nation in which road workers are going to be shot at pretty much makes any serious infrastructure work impossible. It’s better to save the money then sign lots of contracts which they simply know won’t be fulfilled. I’m sure corruption and ethnic rivalries are also a factor… but yeah, overall doing nothing beats wasting tens of billions like the US did.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Erik von Nein
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2005-06-25 04:27am
Location: Boy Hell. Much nicer than Girl Hell.
Contact:

Post by Erik von Nein »

Well, it would help if the excess was being saved for when it was safe enough to start rebuilding, for sure.
"To make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the universe."
— Carl Sagan

Image
Post Reply