Bubble Boy wrote:What was the pilot doing that made him miss seeing big ass fucking power line towers?
"Big ass fucking power line towers" are surprisingly hard to see from the air. In the US, the ones near airports have large, bright orange plastic balls attached to them to increase visibility and they can still be hard to see. When you're in landing phase there's a lot going on and it's hard to keep track of everything - and keep in mind, you're going pretty fast on landing, at least highway speeds. In addition, it's a low wing and given the position of that wing whats below and to some extent in front of you is in your blind spot. This is just one reason why altitude control is important.
Chardok wrote:That is the raddest landing gear EVER to hold up that plane for that long.
Landing gear struts are usually steel, so they're pretty strong, and the information I found on the Europa indicates that it's a lightweight airplane. Total load on that strut was well under a ton (maximum gross weight for that plane is 1370 lbs/623 kg and it may not have been at full weight. With a fuel leak it was also getting progressively lighter). The Cessna 150 I mentioned weighs significantly more and it, too, has been known to hang from one main gear strut.
salm wrote:If pilots are insured anything like motorists are then these costs are not that problematic.
I do not know what the situation is in Germany, but in the US pilots are not required to be insured at all. They are also 100% responsible and liable for any damage they cause. In other words, if this occurred in the US there might be a fine for flying in an unsafe manner (you're supposed to make sure you don't hit powerlines) but the pilot would also be fully responsible for paying the repair costs to the tower, the cost of the cherrypicker crane to get him and his passenger down, etc., etc.