McCain, 5 million a year? Rich!, 3 Million? Middle Class!

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22466
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

McCain, 5 million a year? Rich!, 3 Million? Middle Class!

Post by Mr Bean »

linky
Bloggermsnbclongtype wrote: From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
ALBUQUERQUE, NM -- During a roundtable discussion with a few dozen women here today, Obama used McCain’s recent quip about rich people being those with an income of $5 million to try to paint the Arizona Republican as out of touch with ordinary Americans.

"[McCain] was in a panel the other day with me, Rick Warren, some of you may have seen it -- and Rick Warren asked him -- how do you define rich? He said, maybe he was joking, he said, “$5 million.” Obama added, "Which I guess if you're making $3 million a year, you’re middle class. But that’s reflected in his policies -- where, you know, for people making more than $2.5 million, he’s giving folks a $500,000 tax break. And so this is a fundamental difference in this election. What I've said is we're gonna give 95% of working families a tax break, but it's gonna be ordinary folks."

[***UPDATE: Actually, as we've pointed out, while McCain would substantially cut taxes for millionaires -- more than Obama -- McCain's break for the rich would only be about half of what Obama said. According to the Tax Policy Center, for those making about $2.9 million, they would get a $269,364 tax break from McCain. Obama's cuts are skewed for the middle class and would increase those in that tax bracket by about $700,000. It will be interesting to see if Obama continues to use the figure.]

When asked to define "rich" at Saturday's forum at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church in Orange County, McCain replied, “If you are just talking about income, how about $5 million?” The Arizona senator quickly made clear he was joking and even said at the time that he was probably providing fodder for opponents who would distort the comment.

Both sides have consistently tried to paint the other as out of touch with middle-class concerns. The McCain campaign has portrayed Obama as a tax-and-spend liberal, while Obama says McCain's policies would favor the rich and big businesses.

Today's meeting here with 43 female supporters and volunteers was the senator's second such event in New Mexico in recent months. He was last in Albuquerque on June 23, when he spoke with women about issues like equal pay, paid sick leave, expanding the Family and Medical Leave Act, education, and affordable health care -- all topics he revisited today.

Obama criticized McCain’s health-care plan, saying it would make coverage unaffordable for average families, and he blasted the Republican's opposition to measures to promote alternative energy.

Obama ended the roughly hour-long meeting by telling the audience it was going to be a close election and that New Mexico -- a state that narrowly went to Bush in 2004 -- was going to play an important role. "This is going to be a close election. It's going to be a close election, even though people know George Bush has done a miserable job."

He told a group of donors in San Francisco Sunday that he was gonna win despite attacks by the Republicans' "machinery" and today he told the group he was prepared to fight back.

"We’re going to have to hit back and we’re going to have to fight hard and we’re going to have to work hard," he said. "We’re going to have to earn this election."
FYI If you won Mega millions today with it's 81 million dollar jackpot, over 26 years that's "middle class".
I wish, oh how I wish he would stick to his rhetoric during the debates or some-one during said debates ask McCain(Or Republicans in general) where "Rich" begins. The common sense has been that 250k a year is a pretty good upper limit. You could afford to live anywhere in the country and soon own a home if you so wished. Even in NY you could afford a upper-scale if not top scale penthouse on that budget.

But what about 1 million a year? Rich nearly everyone but McCain would say.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Androsphinx
Jedi Knight
Posts: 811
Joined: 2007-07-25 03:48am
Location: Cambridge, England

Post by Androsphinx »

I'm not sure I understand. McCain said that he was joking and that his opponents would use this against him... and they did.

While McCain's plans for tax cuts are highly reprehensible, of all the things he said in his hour-long interview, why are you attacking him for something that both he and the story which you quote makes clear wasn't serious?

Here's the exchange:
WARREN: Everybody talks about, you know, taxing the rich, but not the poor, the middle class. At what point, give me a number, give me a specific number. Where do you move from middle class to rich? […]

MCCAIN: How about $5 million? No, but seriously, I don’t think you can, I don’t think seriously that the point is I’m trying to make, seriously, and I’m sure that comment will be distorted but the point is…that we want to keep people’s taxes low, and increase revenues. … So, it doesn’t matter really what my definition of rich is because I don’t want to raise anybody’s taxes. I really don’t.
"what huge and loathsome abnormality was the Sphinx originally carven to represent? Accursed is the sight, be it in dream or not, that revealed to me the supreme horror - the Unknown God of the Dead, which licks its colossal chops in the unsuspected abyss, fed hideous morsels by soulless absurdities that should not exist" - Harry Houdini "Under the Pyramids"

"The goal of science is to substitute facts for appearances and demonstrations for impressions" - John Ruskin, "Stones of Venice"
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22466
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

There's a point I'm making here, the first figure he throws out, and the only figure he's thrown out recently is 5 million. Is 4 million upper middle class?

There's a point, you can define rich, the IRS does ever year, it's defined as those with adjusted gross income of at least $200,000 or above are per the IRS "Rich". Anything between 90k and 199k is upper middle class. But McCain won't throw out a definition because he does not want to define himself as Rich. Why he throws out 5 million a year and not 200k, because he sure as hell earns more than 200k a year if not 5 million.

Refine the definition of rich any anyone can be middle class.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
IRG CommandoJoe
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3481
Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm

Re: McCain, 5 million a year? Rich!, 3 Million? Middle Class

Post by IRG CommandoJoe »

200,000 is considered rich? The IRS sucks then. Whenever I hear the word rich I envision multi-million dollar mansions, yachts, private jets, 250k luxury cars, etc. 200,000 is really upper middle class, no?
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi

"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith

Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: McCain, 5 million a year? Rich!, 3 Million? Middle Class

Post by General Zod »

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:200,000 is considered rich? The IRS sucks then. Whenever I hear the word rich I envision multi-million dollar mansions, yachts, private jets, 250k luxury cars, etc. 200,000 is really upper middle class, no?
It really depends. The tricky thing about salary figures is that a lot of CEOs and the like don't make most of their income from salaries, they make it from bonuses. Which means while their salary might be "only" around $200k, they can easily be making $1-3 million per year in their bonus. But. . .the funny thing is very few people outside executive officers make a 200k base salary.

I'll admit I'm not really familiar with the finery of tax law, but bonuses might wind up being factored differently than your base salary in figuring out how much you owe when you get to the upper-tier income brackets.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
The Kernel
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7438
Joined: 2003-09-17 02:31am
Location: Kweh?!

Re: McCain, 5 million a year? Rich!, 3 Million? Middle Class

Post by The Kernel »

General Zod wrote: It really depends. The tricky thing about salary figures is that a lot of CEOs and the like don't make most of their income from salaries, they make it from bonuses. Which means while their salary might be "only" around $200k, they can easily be making $1-3 million per year in their bonus. But. . .the funny thing is very few people outside executive officers make a 200k base salary.

I'll admit I'm not really familiar with the finery of tax law, but bonuses might wind up being factored differently than your base salary in figuring out how much you owe when you get to the upper-tier income brackets.
Stock options and other bonuses can be taxed at the capital gains rate which is only 15%; much lower than the salary tax rate for someone making $200k or more.
User avatar
Chardok
GET THE FUCK OFF MY OBSTACLE!
Posts: 8488
Joined: 2003-08-12 09:49am
Location: San Antonio

Re: McCain, 5 million a year? Rich!, 3 Million? Middle Class

Post by Chardok »

General Zod wrote:
IRG CommandoJoe wrote:200,000 is considered rich? The IRS sucks then. Whenever I hear the word rich I envision multi-million dollar mansions, yachts, private jets, 250k luxury cars, etc. 200,000 is really upper middle class, no?
It really depends. The tricky thing about salary figures is that a lot of CEOs and the like don't make most of their income from salaries, they make it from bonuses. Which means while their salary might be "only" around $200k, they can easily be making $1-3 million per year in their bonus. But. . .the funny thing is very few people outside executive officers make a 200k base salary.

I'll admit I'm not really familiar with the finery of tax law, but bonuses might wind up being factored differently than your base salary in figuring out how much you owe when you get to the upper-tier income brackets.
I know my CEO made something on the order of 12 million in salary in 2004 alone. That's legacy money. When I hear things like that...and see the job he's done, however, It makes me pine for communism.


Or a reasonably intelligent Orangutan in the corner office.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

Someone really needs to put together a really smashing appeal to nostalgia for "the good old days" of those wholesome 50s... back when the top tax bracket was at somewhere around 90%.
"There is no "taboo" on using nuclear weapons." -Julhelm
Image
What is Project Zohar?
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
User avatar
ArmorPierce
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:54pm
Location: Born and raised in Brooklyn, unfornately presently in Jersey

Re: McCain, 5 million a year? Rich!, 3 Million? Middle Class

Post by ArmorPierce »

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:200,000 is considered rich? The IRS sucks then. Whenever I hear the word rich I envision multi-million dollar mansions, yachts, private jets, 250k luxury cars, etc. 200,000 is really upper middle class, no?
Well I think 200,000 a year is rich, just not stupid rich. I would put 200,000 at the top of upper middle class since some professional careers can make it up to there like some doctors and maybe a couple lawyers. I don't consider income to be the sole indicator whether someone is rich however. If someone owns either non-income or low-income producing assets that is in the millions but their income for the year is relatively low, they are obviously rich. For example, someone owns a lot of stocks that don't pay out dividends.
Brotherhood of the Monkey @( !.! )@
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
User avatar
ArmorPierce
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:54pm
Location: Born and raised in Brooklyn, unfornately presently in Jersey

Post by ArmorPierce »

Oh and upper class I would be normally exclusive to people who have a long term build up of inherited family wealth with few exceptions.
Brotherhood of the Monkey @( !.! )@
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Post by Glocksman »

Androsphinx wrote:I'm not sure I understand. McCain said that he was joking and that his opponents would use this against him... and they did.

While McCain's plans for tax cuts are highly reprehensible, of all the things he said in his hour-long interview, why are you attacking him for something that both he and the story which you quote makes clear wasn't serious?

Here's the exchange:
WARREN: Everybody talks about, you know, taxing the rich, but not the poor, the middle class. At what point, give me a number, give me a specific number. Where do you move from middle class to rich? […]

MCCAIN: How about $5 million? No, but seriously, I don’t think you can, I don’t think seriously that the point is I’m trying to make, seriously, and I’m sure that comment will be distorted but the point is…that we want to keep people’s taxes low, and increase revenues. … So, it doesn’t matter really what my definition of rich is because I don’t want to raise anybody’s taxes. I really don’t.
In other words, McSame dodged the question because he didn't want to answer it.

That's not very much better.
And frankly given all of the outright lies McCain spreads about Obama, I'm having a lot of trouble being outraged over Obama taking the quote out context.

As they say in Chicago, 'Politics ain't beanbag'.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
Post Reply