Kanastrous wrote:PainRack wrote:That's hoping for a miracle, not believing that god >>>> medical science.
If you believe in any conception of God that I am familiar with, you must believe that this God is not only >>>> than medical science, but also than all science, all human knowledge and endeavor, etc, etc, etc.
Right?
Let's go over what the article says, kay?
More than half of randomly surveyed adults — 57 percent — said God's intervention could save a family member even if physicians declared treatment would be futile. And nearly three-quarters said patients have a right to demand such treatment.
Physicians says treatment is futile, however you believe that its still WORTH it to continue treatment, in the hopes that God will deliver a miracle and save your family member. And its within your rights to demand such treatment.
When asked to imagine their own relatives being gravely ill or injured, nearly 20 percent of doctors and other medical workers said God could reverse a hopeless outcome.
This statement is saying that even if its hopeless, a miracle MIGHT happen despite what the science says.
The survey is simply linking the theological position to the simple pyschological aspect of denial and bargaining. Even if its hopeless, people are hoping for a miracle, and demanding that treatment continues hoping that somehow, they're going to go against the odds and its going to work.
And that even medical workers are vulnerable to this belief. Therefore, anyone working with patients need to take this into consideration so as to develop a more effective patient practioner relationship.
All the talk about God might intervene is just whitewash over the central issue, that people are not emotionally conditioned to accept recommendations and want to believe a miracle might happen, that something might happen against the odds.
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner